Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

More hypocrisy on how the Shuster incident was handled:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 06:03 PM
Original message
More hypocrisy on how the Shuster incident was handled:

He's Outta Here


We now know that MSNBC's David Shuster has been suspended over the Chelsea 'pimp' comment. It seems to me there are a couple possibilities for what is happening here.

What Shuster said was tasteless and crude. And even the logic behind it, let alone the way he said it, didn't really make sense to me. I don't come close to defending it. And he should apologize for saying it, which he did -- though perhaps he might have done so more fulsomely. I do not think the comment played to specific stereotypes about women in general or about Hillary in particular as it would if you refer to a black man as "lazy" or "shiftless" or a woman as "shrill" or a "shrew." Nor am I aware that Shuster has any history of such comments -- unlike some other MSNBC TV personalities.

Unlike pretty much everyone else on the chat shows he's a reporter who consistently does pretty solid investigative pieces. But regardless of that, who can name me the last political chat show host or reporter who was suspended over anything? To say that he's being held to a different standard than TV chatters normally are is probably a farcical statement in itself since I'm not clear that there are any standards.

Does anyone watch Fox News?

On the other hand, many have rightly criticized Chris Matthews for his repeatedly degrading, often sexist and consistently clownish comments about Hillary Clinton. The most logical way for me to understand this development is that MSNBC is under a lot of fire for Matthews -- but Matthews is untouchable -- and Shuster's easier to can or suspend.

(emphasis added)

"Does anyone watch Fox News?"

The channel that Hillary wants to hold her suggested debate?





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. If Senator Clinton is pining for Faux News to be her information outlet...
...then it only reinforces my decision to support Senator Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. I love Shuster and think he is one of the most balanced and
Edited on Fri Feb-08-08 06:20 PM by Little Star
professional reporters MSNBC has. He used very poor judgment in his wording (pimped out is like being called a ho). I do not think he meant it to come out the way it did. However, he is a professional and should have known better. He should apologize and he should take his short suspension, like the man I believe him to be. Will be glad to see him back and I hope soon.

If Chelsea were my daughter and someone said that about her....I won't go there!

MSNBC is all positive Obama and all negative Clinton. KO can kiss my butt, he is no Edward R Murrow, thats for sure. As a faithful KO fan for many years, long before MSNBC, he has opened my eyes to just who he is. He has become what he calls Billo. Dan Abrams has taken over the balanced part of MSNBC. The rest of them, including that obnoxious Mika, can kiss my grits!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Saturday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. You are absolutely right! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. It's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. "KO can kiss my butt, he is no Edward R Murrow" Hillary is a hypocrite:
Hillary's campaign is upset with David Shuster, but the Clintons are best friends with McCain

Bill Clinton: John McCain and Hillary are 'very close'

McCain and his blogger apparently agree: Chelsea Clinton is "ugly"


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. This is RUMOR from Free Republic.. the last bit. Please please PULEEZZEE delete it..
That upsets me as a mother. What Shuster said was stupid but he meant nothing by it. That tripe is just horrible and mean and DESIGNED TO HURT. It just doesn't need to be here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. No, it's a "joke" John McCain told being reported by Media Matters. n/t
Edited on Fri Feb-08-08 06:37 PM by ProSense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Mika has gotten truly obnoxious lately, but what I hear her is
constantly defending the Clintons and diminishing Obama. She twists things to incite her "guests" and I don't remember her doing that when she first started. The other thing that bugs me, and this is superficial, but she pans to the camera like one of the QVC Shopper Girls. It drives me batty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC