Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

We need to continue to email MSNBC about Schusters sexist comments, He has to go like IMUS did!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
REDFISHBLUEFISH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:54 PM
Original message
We need to continue to email MSNBC about Schusters sexist comments, He has to go like IMUS did!
Edited on Fri Feb-08-08 02:55 PM by REDFISHBLUEFISH
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=4467257&mesg_id=4467257

We have emails and the full topic here!

I ask that you all contact msnbc and voice your concerns. It should not matter which side
You are on—this language is uncalled for.


This is the contact I came up with. If anyone have a better one please post it.
Thanks

email at:
letters@msnbc.com
and

multimedia@msnbc.com

PLEASE KEEP KICKED.



Forum Name General Discussion: Primaries
Topic subject David Schuster asks if the Clinton's are "pimping out" Chelsea
Topic URL http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...
4466917, David Schuster asks if the Clinton's are "pimping out" Chelsea
Posted by Husb2Sparkly on Thu Feb-07-08 05:37 PM

His point is that she's campaigning and wants to know why he can't interview her by sticking a microphone in her face.

His point was valid. His phrasing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Saturday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Done. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. Bullshit! The Clintons are NOT Gods and Goddesses. Chelsea is "of age" - it was a gaffe.
Edited on Fri Feb-08-08 02:59 PM by ShortnFiery
Get the hell over it!?!

I'm so sick of having to treat QUEEN Hillary and Princess Chelsea with deference.

Hello?!? We don't have "royals" here in the USA, not even of "The Political" type.

I'm just plain sick of The Clintons and all their SENSELESS whining.

Tell Chelsea to go back to her meager SIX FIGURE Hedge Fund Salary, but stop muzzling the journalists, who like the people, are getting SICK of the Clintons' smarmy campaign tactics, including creating a scandal out of NOTHING! :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. a gaffe? Seriously, sexism (and Clinton attacks) are so the norm
Edited on Fri Feb-08-08 03:00 PM by Evergreen Emerald
here that people who purport to be "progressive" don't see them for what they are. Imagine if MSNBC used racism to attack Obama. Would that be ok with you too? After all, he is not king.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REDFISHBLUEFISH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. These Obama supporters LIKE sexist attacks on Clintons!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. This is a CLASSIC "Clintonian tactic" that worked so well in the 90s. Hello? It's 2008.
:shrug: :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. "Clinton tactic?" What, to call the MSM on their sexism?
Or is the MSM tactic to use anything and everything to attack Clinton no matter how offensive?

Why is sexism ok with you? So much for a progressive board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Wow
Even John Gotti didn't target the children of his enemies...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. Hello? Princess Chelsea is 27 y.o. - FIVE years older than Monica was when she did Bill.
For all I do, I do NOT ... I say again, I do NOT start multitudes of SMEAR THREADS based on innuendo regarding my opponent.

No, The Clintons have to realize that Chelsea is no longer "a girl" and this is NOT THE 1990s. In essence, we're SICK of having to defend The Clinton's name when their adorers choose to whine for them. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. Huh
Edited on Fri Feb-08-08 03:12 PM by DemocratSinceBirth
I'll repeat and elaborate...

Even John Gotti didn't target the children of his opponents, even those who had reached the age of majority...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alstephenson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. I don't care if she's 101 years old....
the remark was sexist and an apology by David Shuster is in order. I wouldn't call for his firing, though. I was surprised to see this from him, but it's still unacceptable. So you think saying Chelsea was being "pimped" is O.K., huh? Geez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #26
42. He need to apologize to Chelsea
If he can do that, I've got no beef. But that doesn't change the fact this is part of a pattern with this network and they must note we are watching.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #26
56. And he did. So what's next. The OP wants the man's head
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
53. If his enemies kids were out doing the family business, I bet he would have.
She is working her mother's campaign. She is also an adult. If she didn't want to take any heat, she should have stayed in the background.

I felt the same way when Elizabeth Edwards would direct a zinger at one of the other candidates, and then when people protested her words, out came "How DARE you attack a woman with cancer."

Neither one flies with me. If you're going into battle, expect to take a couple of hits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. Aren't there right-wing sites
you should be trolling to get more cartoons of Hillary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. I'll see your Fairy Tale and raise you a PIMP
And "creating a scandal out of NOTHING" -- like a phony incident of race-baiting that even Obama said was not race-baiting?

Tell me, which people are getting sick of the Clintons' so-called smarmy campaign tactics that you have been inventing in your mind? The Clintons are still quite popular, which drives you nuts. Hillary's polling numbers are up. And nobody hates Bill -- except for a million or so political junkies and about 10 million gun nuts enthusiasts.

Hate will eat you alive.

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wombatzu Donating Member (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
30. what's funny is...
until this remark Shuster's reporting has always come across as pro-Clinton to me.

yeah, get rid of him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wombatzu Donating Member (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. Clinton tactic: steer people away from reality
make a lot of noise, confuse people, keep your name in the news cycle, make a play for sympathy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
64. Yeah yeah,
Racism sucks, but homophobia and sexism are OK.


Yay Obama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. You Hillary supporters are almost as big a whiners about the media as
the neocons have been about the coverage of W.

Geesh.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REDFISHBLUEFISH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Wait til they call Obama a "cult leader" Im going to remind you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countingbluecars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. An apology seem appropriate
and sufficient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Saturday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. They fired Imus, why not Shuster?
Imus apologized too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Because CHELSEA is a Public Figure. Hell, if she campaigns for morally bankrupt people maybe
she is "pimping" for mom and dad after all? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #18
28. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #18
37. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Mags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #18
43. What makes you to appear so eaten up with anger that
you could say a young women is pimping for her Mother. How would you feel if it was said about BO's daughters? I'm sad for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #18
44. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
9. Schuster apologized on Morning Joe this AM.
In case you didnt know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #9
54. Apparently Redfishbluefish want's Mr. Schuster's head on a platter
Apologies not accepted, it seems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. I emailed Clinton campaign because of Bill's RACIST comments. He has to go.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REDFISHBLUEFISH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. Clinton racist? LOL To funny!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. I emailed Clinton campaign because of Clintons deceitful gain of Dubai $$MILLIONS
from the very same royals who staked the major share of BCCI - as in the BCCI Report and its outstanding matters that were deep-sixed by Bill Clinton throughout the 90s.

Does THAT make you giggle, too, sunshine?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #24
39. And how did we learn about that?
Because Bill Clinton disclosed it to the public on his own initiative.

Some crook HE is!

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. Really? He told you in his book about how he protected those SAME Dubai royals
throughout the 90s?

BTW - Clinton didn't disclose that the 20 million he received was Dubai money. It was learned that Yucaipa who paid Bill received a timely windfall from Dubai.

You faithful Clinton defenders are not exactly open government CITIZENS concerned about your right to honest and accountable government are you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #41
51. First, you have to tell the truth, not defame people
Clinton indeed disclosed the whole deal.

What care I if he makes $20 million? If he does it legally, that's no different than if Bono makes $20 million promoting iPods.

You are so blinded by your anti-Clinton hatred that you are seeing what you want to see. The smear machine has been operating for two decades.

And why is "CITIZENS" in all caps? Trying to marginalize those who disagree with you?

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. Clinton told you about the DUBAI money? When and where?
You don't know anything about BCCI or you wouldn't continue to defend Clinton.

I used to defend him consistently believing he had a reason for hiding the BCCI report - then his book came out and he chose to BULLSHIT the readers instead of sharing what went on then and how he handled all the matters. He never wrote ONE WORD about it though it was handed to him when he took office.

And now the SAME Dubai dollars that STAKED a major share of BCCI is pouring MILLIONS of dollars into Bill's bank account?

If you can't see that is a serious lapse, then you have an enormous blind spot that Clinton-love has nurtured.

Do you even UNDERSTAND that BCCI matters left unscrutinized led directly to the return of Bush2? Led directly to what happened on 9-11? Is leading us directly into war with Iran?

Did you ever even READ the outstanding matters section of that report handed to Clinton when he took office?

Jump on a corruption thread, sunshine. Try the INSLAW thread in GD. Argue with the DOCUMENTS posted there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #52
59. Been there. Read that.
I had a friend who likewise hated Bill Clinton with a white-hot intensity. I've been reading this dreck over and over since the early 1990s. And all it is, is guilt by loose association and "everybody knows". You could use that principle to hang the Dalai Lama if you tried -- ask the Chinese government.

And that's the second time you've called me "sunshine". It's getting creepy. I'm not sure what's motivating that, but I'm not a woman.

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #59
60. I knew you weren't a woman. I am. But this is MORE than association. This is
Edited on Fri Feb-08-08 06:28 PM by blm
direct.

Jackson Stephens was a key figure in BCCI who brought (Dubai and Pakistan's)BCCI bank to this country w/GHWBush.

Jackson Stephens was also Bill Clinton's political patron in Arkansas and UNDERWROTE Bill's primary campaign.

GHWBush expected to be impeached after the BCCI report's release in Dec 1992, and he proceeded to run the worst campaign in history.

Bill was handed the BCCI report when he took office. What happened? If he was an honest president who believed in accountability as you believe, then show me in his book where he explains how he dealt with all the outstanding matters in that report.

You should have no trouble at all. It was a 5 1/2 year investigation that was HUGE - so there should be plenty for a new Dem president to deal with, right?

And do you think ANY president even remotely familiar with BCCI and its impact on events around the world like 9-11, should accept MILLIONS of dollars from its owners?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. Which racist comments were those?
:shrug:

He's made none.

Ergo, you are telling a lie. Please stop.

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. South Carolina? Oh you know ...Jesse Jackson won South Carolina.....
Edited on Fri Feb-08-08 03:16 PM by blm
The turnip truck missing a passenger lately?

Every political watcher knew exactly what Clinton was saying when he said that. That SC is easily dismissed BECAUSE the black population will support ANY black candidate. And Bill wanted to make sure that point was HEARD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REDFISHBLUEFISH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #27
34. Yt you like MSNBC's sexist stuff? No principles? FIGURES!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #34
50. Nope. Don't support sexist. Don't support racist. Don't support FASCISTS and Bushlovers.
Edited on Fri Feb-08-08 04:35 PM by blm
Too bad you can't say the same, can you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #27
36. You mean the ones Obama said were NOT racist?
Political wonks agree: The two primaries (actually 1988 was a caucus) were uncannily similar. Dukakis and Jackson got the same proportion of the votes as did Clinton and Obama. The demographic voting patterns were surprisingly alike.

But the press decided they wanted to get the "f**k Hillary" bandwagon going, so they accused Bill of racism.

And you believed it.

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #36
58. You believe Bushes need protecting so you support Clintons.
Jump on a corruption thread. Learn something. There's one in GD right now - INSLAW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maximusveritas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
12. He already apologized. Why would we want him gone
when he's one of the few media people on the side of the Democrats? So they can replace him with Rove or some other RW nut? I don't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. "they" seem to be ignoring this fact.
shocking eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alstephenson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
33. He's not "on the side of the Democrats".
He's just a better, less biased reporter than most. I wouldn't want to lose his perspective, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
14. We lost Schuster??!!1?
Not a good sign :cry:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mojowork_n Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #14
25. OMG, When Mika and Joe are all kissy face in the morning, getting
carried away with themselves, and their own importance, he's the grown-up. The News Reporter, not the News Personality.

...But WAIT! I said, "kissy face..." and put Mika's name in front of Joe's. Oops... Which probably makes my comment sexist, as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. Yep, MSNBC has jumped the shark...infotainment to infoporn....
I almost miss Imus more :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nutsnberries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
29. oh gimme a break!
the guy looked like he was gonna cry in shame when he apologized.

my only problem with schuster is that he seems to respect tweety - which pisses me off. :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countingbluecars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
32. I hope you were this outraged
when the media refused to cover or gave biased coverage of the crimes committed by the Bush administration. I hope you contacted them then. This seems pretty minor in comparison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
38. Disagree
He's a good reporter. But I agree that the "apology" was pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
40. Imus is back on the air - radio and tv.

And I'm glad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bcoylepa Donating Member (438 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
45. bad taste - free speech
look it was way in bad taste - but we need now more than ever to support free speech
and as much as I hate to say so - it isn't that far from John Stewart calling Romney a douchebag last night- its politics/entertainment and she is an adult and can stand up for herself
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
46. CALM THE FUCK DOWN...it was an off the cuff remark that was ill-advised...
Edited on Fri Feb-08-08 03:40 PM by truebrit71
...fuck me sideways, should we crucify him too??:eyes:

You fucking Hilltards are driving me around the bend...:grr:

CALM THE FUCK DOWN SHE IS NOT FUCKING ROYALTY!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REDFISHBLUEFISH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. BOOM! HE GOT HIS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bigleaf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
47. All you people crying for Schuster to go need to take a deep breath and
Wake the Fuck up!!! The guy made a mistake and apologized. This primary will be over soon and you will be praising him for calling out the BS the Pubs spew at us. Holy shit, I am an Obama supporter and I'd say the same thing if it was directed at Obama's daughter. Yeah, let's get rid of one of the 2 people (Olbermann is the other) who we depend on to call the right wing on their BS. Be very careful what you wish for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
49. Regardless of your candidate....
It is time for the MSM to learn that there's a new sheriff in town, and this kind of off-the-cuff obnoxious comment is no longer acceptable.

No matter who wins the nom, the MSM needs to learn some fucking manners, ricky-ticky. Shock-jock bullshit is NOT legitimate political discourse.

I'm all for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REDFISHBLUEFISH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #49
63. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tokenlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
55. Better get the POSSE and go HANG the guy!!!
Cut his balls off while you're at it too!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestdogest Donating Member (51 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
57. Schuster is classless, but we have become a classless society.
Unfortunately, his comments are typical of what passes for commentary in this day and age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
61. I so totally agree.
Shuster's such a media whore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
62. Nope, Not Gonna Do It
David Schuster is a good guy, he's not a Don Imus. Rarely does this man ever make a mistake in his reporting, he is articulate and accurate. He's on our side, remember?

Clinton's are pimping out their daughter. If this race is decided by superdelegates, I won't vote!

God this place sucks lately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC