Do a Google Image search on "Obama" and then "Hillary". Look at the results. Consider what it means.

[Bonobo]

Like it or not, that is the culture that we live in.
Google is huge.
It is a projected image and it is also a mirror.

Be honest with yourself and without shouting, consider what it means. Not how it offends you or how you take it personally, but in as broad a way as you can.

Is that really a recipe for a good and successful presidency? With that kind of baggage already?

And no, please don't just blame the whole thing away on "Hillary-Haters" because they exist whether you like it or not. Also, very few of them are the DU'er type, I suspect-more like Freeper work. But still. It is meaningful in the GE.

[SIMPLYB1980]

1. Obama's Google is as bad as Clintons.

Whats your point.

[soleft]

2. I didn't see any difference in the type of sites that came up

[Bonobo]

3. I'll give you the links I got and you decide.

http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&q=Hillary&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wi

http://images.google.com/images?um=1&hl=en&q=Obama&btnG=Search+Images

My impression was that if you did a statistical analysis, you would find that the Hillary ones were overwhelmingly negative.

[Clintonista2]

4. You're right. Google images should decide our candidate.

:eyes:

[SIMPLYB1980]

5. Look at this. If you dare.

http://images.google.com/images?um=1&hl=en&safe=off&q=barack+hussein+obama&btnG=Search+Images

[Bonobo]

7. I rather like this one.

[SIMPLYB1980]

6. Also if you google Hillary Clinton. Or Hillary Rodham Clinton.

You get these.

http://images.google.com/images?um=1&hl=en&safe=off&q=Hillary+Clinton&btnG=Search+Images

http://images.google.com/images?um=1&hl=en&safe=off&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&q=Hillary+Rodham+Clinton&spell=1

Less porn stars that way. Or do you not know how google works?

[Mr.Fitzgibbons]

8. The Bill with fuzzy 70s hair photo is HILARIOUS n/t