Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

From an Obamaista to the Clinton supporters... I'm proud of Sen. Clinton today

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:09 PM
Original message
From an Obamaista to the Clinton supporters... I'm proud of Sen. Clinton today

Breaking: Hillary Campaign Goes To War With MSNBC Over Chelsea 'Pimp' Comment
By Greg Sargent - February 8, 2008, 1:19PM - TPM Election Central


This is really something. The Hillary campaign has just gone to war with MSNBC, dispatching a top Hillary adviser to launch a lacerating attack on the network on a conference call with reporters moments ago.

On the call, top Hillary adviser Howard Wolfson suggested that there's a "pattern" of reprehensible comments by MSNBC personalities, and said outright that the Hillary campaign could no longer "envision a scenario where we would debate on that network given the comments that were made and have been made."

Wolfson made the comments in response to a question about a now-notorious comment by MSNBC's David Shustser, in which he asked if Chelsea's campaigning on her mom's behalf meant she was being "pimped" by the Hillary campaign.

This shit is totally beyond the pale. Good for Clinton, going after the media for attacking Chelsea like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. They're great media watchdogs when their own oxe is gored...
The problem is they generally stand silent on the media and all of the issues related to it.

Where were they when Phil Donahue got axed for being too anti-war?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Respectfully
If you said I was pimping out my daughter , mom, or sister I would drop you and if I said that you were pimping out your wife, daugher, or sister I would expect you to drop me...

That shit is beyond the pale...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
26. I agree it's beyond the pale and she was right to speak out
My point was that so many things have been beyond the pale regarding the media, and the Clintons have eitehr been on the sidelines or schmoozing with the media barons and helping to create this climate.

If only they had been equally forceful in pushing for more balance and less slander during the days of the Iraq War Debate.

They helped to create a situation, and only get upset when it bites them in the butt.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
publicatlarge Donating Member (149 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #26
36. The MSM has been all over the Clintons since 1992...
...so, I don't understand your assertion:
'They helped to create a situation, and only get upset when it bites them in the butt'
? ? ?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. You have no idea where they were unless you are privy to
every bit of correspondence and telephone calls of NBC and Congress. Were you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
25. If a tree falls in the forest...
and there's no one around to hear it, does it make a sound?

If an official doesn't make their comments public, they might as well not exist as far as I'm concerned. If they want me to think something they should come out with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #11
30. Um they were in the White House during much of it
Bill Clinton presided over the assembling of these monsters, and he presided over removing any requirement that the media serve the public responsibly.

And I wish Hillary had orchestrated a campaign to quash the biased cheerleading for Bush and slander against war critics during the Iraq War debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. From an Edwards support, its time for all the Democratic candidates
to hold the media accountable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimGinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. She wants all future debates on Fox
They're "Fair & Balanced" :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. At Least They Never Implied Chelsea Was A Prostitute
~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. I think they should have them on PBS
But that's just me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatnHat Donating Member (669 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
24. And Clinton bashers
Edited on Fri Feb-08-08 02:33 PM by CatnHat
are nothing more than what the Limbaugh's and Hannity's of the world are; dirty and petty. I swear some of the Obama "crowd" are republican trolls. Hope and Change, Indeed.

If the media went after Obama's kid, then maybe you just might "feel" the "injustice". But again, trying to debate anyone in the Obama camp, it is next to impossible; it's reminiscent of when the Bush crowd went after Bill Clinton, and you have the nerve to call yourselves democrats and running on hope and change. Hypocrites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimGinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #24
37. How is it anyone not supporting Hillary
is compared to Limbaugh & Hanninty and then the name calling and the "cult" references come out. Maybe Hillary should clean up her own house...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. If the Hillary supporters thought MSNBC dissed them before......
Edited on Fri Feb-08-08 02:13 PM by DJ13
......this wont help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. Maybe Not
This might cost Shuster his job...

This is going to be huge...

Might become bigger than Imus...

Calling the First Daughter a whore... Can it get bigger?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
32. As always, Obama people want Hillary to roll over and gracefully
Edited on Fri Feb-08-08 02:38 PM by anamandujano
accept whatever crap is hurled at her. It sure would make your job easier though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm glad. They, including our beloved KO have been over the
top. The only exception has been Dan Abrams, who has on a couple of occasions that I watched, demanded some fairness for Hillary. Yes, even Keith Olbermann can be criticized.

Speaking of fairness, where was the Obama biography on MSNBC? Maybe tonight?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Thanks for mentioning the absence of the Obama Biography ! I'm fairly sure they don't
have one of those "in the can" and aren't planning on running one. Its all part of the fix.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Be fair. Those two bios are at least a couple of years old.
Might be because there was simply no time. Don't think it was done as an affront to Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. No, I agree totally. Those ARE old because I've seen them before. I'm
guessing they just don't have one done on Obama :-) Still, in the interest of fair play, its not exactly fair to run two one-hour bios on McCain and Hillary and not given Obama an hour of free time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #16
29. They may be culling his speeches as we speak.
It may be problematic that they can't find enough to fill an hour. An editor knows it will put the audience to sleep after the hope and inspiration angle is used 40 times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. Exactly, he was barely on anyone's radar a few short years ago.
He has gone from the total obscurity of a state senator to a presidential candidate. This is some scary stuff. I want to know who's pulling the strings.

I believe a yikes is in order, not a complaint about not showing a biography.

Let me guess, the Hillary biog showcases the Lewinsky scandal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. I think it's should be a real problem for Maddo and Schultz to appear on MSNBC, in particular.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. What is any of this going to change, except that Shuster will apologize and for the next
month or so, no one will dare report anything critical of Hillary and reportage will be even MORE lopsided than it is now.

Don't get me wrong, it NEEDS to be addressed and FIXED. But the system we have now is not working !

Exhibit A: Media fucks up. Media gets blasted. Media apologizes.
Exhibit B: Two weeks later media is back to the SOS.

My solution: GET RID OF Shuster, Tweety, Tucker, Morning HO and ALL those partisan hacks. Return to Journalism, NOT punditry.

Can we lobby for THAT?? An apology is not what we need. An overhaul is what we need.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. I agree. I advise everyone to not give one atom of trust to GE MSNBC, NBC, CNBC.
I've been pushing that for years. Anyone who does is not awake.

Olberman = money making aberration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. Hate to say it, but I think Abrams is better than Olbermann (sp?) now.
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
31. Now Olbermann is evil? Are you freaking insane?
Edited on Fri Feb-08-08 02:36 PM by tridim
I agree Shuster made a dumb comment and should apoligize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #31
38. No Olberman is not evil. He works for an evil corporation. I believe he
Edited on Fri Feb-08-08 11:57 PM by higher class
is genuine in his direction and passion. However, he only gets to express his own opinion and only gets to select a certain per cent of what he covers. He gets to do it because he makes money for MSNBC/GE - from all people who turn in to watch him. I don't listen to the those programs any more - I've watched for 17 years straight and I know everything they are going to say and I can follow the subtleties. Been there. Done that. Don't need it anymore. I do, however, stop and watch the clips posted on youtube when enough DUers talk about it.

I like Keith - I don't know how you jumped to your conclusion. However, I usually say he is an exception, because he leads and he believes in himself and expresses himself to the degree MSNBC allows it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
10. Bubba should have clocked Imus at the White House correspondents dinner. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
15. Good. MSNBC has been to Clinton what Fox News is to Democrats generally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
19. Thank you and good for her...did anyone ever say this about the
Bush daughters, Al Gore's offspring? There seems to be a double standard at play, where the Clintons can be degraded over everything, and so it leads to shit like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Did anyone ever makes snide and derogatory remarks about Romney's 5 sons
whose asses should have been in Iraq?:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. Yeah, if you're a big supporter of the war, then go there...
...but other than that, I don't think any reporter called them assholes or said they were pimping for Daddy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
20. EXCELLENT! Shuster went waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay over the line on attacking Chelsea.
WTF has she ever done to anyone? Nothing. Shame on him and shame on MSNBC for employing the likes of Tweety and Shuster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
28. The Main Stream Media got infected by the trash talk of Right Wing Hate Radio
They spout outrageous garbage all of the time as if they were just reporting poll numbers. Hillary Clinton is more often the victim of this than most Democrats, but Democrats as a whole suffer much more than Republicans from this media assault that unfairly targets our PArty a disproportionate amount of the time.

The thing is Hillary Clinton found the perfect point to draw the line here that virtually any of America's hundreds of millions of parents can understand like they would a punch to their gut; talk of Chelsea being pimped. This is the ideal repulsive example to throw in the media's shit talking face. This time the shit will blow back and stick exactly where it belongs.

It is possible her fighting stance over this will help Hillary Clinton in the short term (though maybe not - the media just may have one more axe to grind against her because of her calling them out like this) but in the long term it will help all Democrats, and all citizens who are tired of shock jock talk passing as political commentary in America.

I know how sincerely protective both Bill and Hillary Clinton have been of Chelsea, fearing that she would become the subject of this type of vile public attention because of her parents careers. I think Hillary's anger about this is genuine, well founded, and very well placed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
33. I hope Wolfson backhanded those MSNBC whores.
and i mean that in the most non-sexist way possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
34. the media kids think it's cool to beat up on hillary. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notundecided Donating Member (86 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
35. Journalist of the Past.
Could you imagine Eric Severeid, Howard K smith, Edward R. Murrow, Harry Reasoner, Robert Trout, Walter Cronkite say the President's Daughter is being "Pimped Out"? If this were 125 years ago Bill Clinton would be challenging Schuster to a duel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC