the persistence of this notion that, while Barack will easily carry Hillary's constituants.... she will not carry his. The story line is that Hillary needs Barack, but he does not need her. I've even heard Barack say this... on more than one occasion.
In reality, I'd say there is a serious problem looming on BOTH sides of this argument. Both of our dream team candidates need each other. Especially now.... that we have a moderate as the presumed candidate of the GOP.
There are, I suspect, several Hillarians (aren't I hillarious? haha) who will be perfectly comfortable voting for John McCain. I have actually heard that comment on the ground here in Ohio (where the Democratic party's polls show Clinton and Obama in a dead heat at this moment.) It seems a strong sentiment in SE Ohio. Probably partly fueled by racism. Partly by a desire, amongst working class union families, for some kind of an economic "track record." SE Ohio has been very hard hit by the economic slowdown. I drive out to rescue dogs there and I have to tell you... the poverty is quite striking. It is one of the most Dem inclined regions of our state, too. A region that remembers the Clinton years fondly, as a time of prosperity. Whenever I travel east, along SR 52 during election season, I am struck by the difference in yard signs. (In SW Ohio, where I live, the GOP rules.)
Last evening I came across this:
http://nuestravoice.com/?p=1425 It's pretty telling I think. Here is at least one other block of Hillarians that would be at least as likely to vote for McCain, as they would Obama. (Remember, McCain's name is on the top of a bill that calls for the kind of immigration reform many latinos want.)
It's seeming pretty clear at this point, that we are going to need our dream team to beat the GOP. Even *with* the dream team.... we have no guarantees, of course. But without both Hillary and Barack on the ticket in November, we are in for a disappointing election.
Quite frankly, the Obama people need to stop talking about all of their voters that will "stay home" if he is not the nominee. Because, while voter turnout will be key for the Dems in the 2008 election. Turnout for the other side is at least twice as bad as staying home altogether.
(This was from my blog today.... and thought I'd share it here as well. Since we both referenced the same article.)