Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Udeniable Evidence of Obama's Support Among Independants.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:39 PM
Original message
Udeniable Evidence of Obama's Support Among Independants.
Edited on Thu Feb-07-08 12:49 PM by Bonobo
I need help compiling this. Anyone want to thrown any links they have here?

I believe the "Obama Effect" has been well demonstrated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'll start: "Schneider: Independents overwhelmingly support Obama"
Schneider: Independents overwhelmingly support Obama

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/03/schneider-independents-overwhelmingly-support-obama/Schneider:

Independents overwhelmingly support Obama

In a result bodes well for Barack Obama heading into New Hampshire, the Illinois Democrat overwhelmingly won among Independent voters — 40 percent of those voters chose Obama, compared to 25 percent for John Edwards and 14 percent for Hillary Clinton.

Why is this good news for Obama? Only 20 percent those who attended the Democratic caucuses said they were Independents. But a significantly higher percentage of self-indentified Independents are expected to vote in New Hampshire’s Democratic primary next week.

– CNN Senior Political Analyst Bill Schneider
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Ooop, found this:
Independents Fuel Obama's Lead

http://marcambinder.theatlantic.

Thirty percent of the poll's respondents said a candidate's ability to bring about change is the most important, followed by 27 percent who said their priority is choosing a candidate who will be the most successful in unifying the country.

Asked which candidate would do the best on these themes, caucusgoers most commonly name Obama. The first-term U.S. senator has argued in the closing weeks of the campaign that his newness to Washington, D.C., would help him bridge a politically divided nation and improve its standing overseas.

Having the experience and competence to lead, which has been the crux of Clinton's closing argument, was seen as the most important to 18 percent of caucusgoers, with Clinton as the candidate most commonly rated best on this trait.

Clinton receives more support from women 55 years old and older than her rivals, and she and Obama draw evenly from the pool of female caucusgoers between 35 and 54 years old.com/archives/2007/12/independents_fuel_obamas_lead.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. Then there's also this:
Obama gets support from some in GOP

http://www.lvrj.com/news/12586971.html



Presidential candidate Barack Obama's campaign is hoping Republicans in Nevada will bolster his chances in the January Democratic caucuses, while the campaign of his top rival, Hillary Clinton, is seeking to make inroads among Hispanics.

Virginia's Democratic governor, Tim Kaine, a top national Obama supporter, said the 660 Nevada Republicans who have pledged to caucus for the Illinois senator prove that Obama has crossover appeal.

These voters, Kaine said, "are repelled by what they see in Washington, and they really want someone who is an independent thinker." Their willingness to support Obama also shows that the Illinois senator can potentially do well in next year's general election, he said.

The campaign says Republican voters came to them, not vice versa. The list of GOP Obama supporters, which the campaign provided, doesn't include elected officials or other big names, just rank-and-file registered Republicans from across the state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. Missouri
Independents

Obama 67%
Clinton 30%


White Independents

Obama 59%
Clinton 37%


http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/epolls/index.html#MODEM


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Utah
Independents

Obama 68%
Clinton 26%


White Independents

Obama 66%
Clinton 28%

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/epolls/index.html#UTDEM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Connecticut
Independents

Obama 62%
Clinton 32%


White Independents

Obama 61%
Clinton 33%


Black Independents

Obama 83%
Clinton 16%

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/epolls/index.html#CTDEM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. California


Independents

Obama 56%
Clinton 33%


White Independents

Obama 58%
Clinton 30%



http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/epolls/index.html#CADEM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Doesn't this tell us the whole story of who is the better candidate in the GE?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC