Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Another VP Poll #2

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-04 11:59 PM
Original message
Poll question: Another VP Poll #2
Edited on Fri Mar-05-04 12:08 AM by Bleachers7
This is a followup to yesterdays...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=429737

Schakowsky's website
http://www.house.gov/schakowsky/

Here are some ideas. I am leaving out Clark and Edwards because they will win this every time. I want to work some other ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cosmokramer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why no Clark?
I know for a fact he is being considered by the Kerry campaign...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I am going with the same mindset from yesterday.
Edited on Fri Mar-05-04 12:19 AM by Bleachers7
Clark and Edwards win these every time. I am trying to work some other ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomSeaver Donating Member (100 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Where the heck is
Tom Vilsack and Wes Clark these two guys are serious candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I added Vilsack
Edited on Fri Mar-05-04 12:03 AM by Bleachers7
Thanks for reminding me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmokramer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. O I C
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. How do you know?
I'd sure like to think that was true. :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pale Blue Dot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
5. Ed Rendell?
Yes, he's a northerner, but his strength is in his "everyman" image. That could be a good counterpoint to Kerry's semi-"elitist" image.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
6. Who is voting for Schakowsky?
and why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lams712 Donating Member (645 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. I did because she's cool
Why the hell not??? It was something different. She won't get it, she's "too liberal". I just wanted to show some love for our female candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lucidmadman Donating Member (551 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
7. I voted Cleland. I always do. Two reasons...
...he puts GA into play in the GE and, if presented right, he will appeal to males between 40 and 60 years old throughout the South and Mid-West. It's a matter of someone who appeals to people that aren't necessarily like me. Or you. I base my thinking on what I've heard pollsters and Poly Sci pros say...It's a 45/45% country, everyone's fighting for that 10%. Cleland's the one that can settle it, IMO...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. That's a good way of thinking about it.
I think Cleland would back up Kerry's Vietnam record which they want to exploit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #7
16. But Cleland lost his Senate seat in Ga
so how can he carry it as a VP candidate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lucidmadman Donating Member (551 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 02:32 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. "They" ran a really smelly campaign against him...
...I get your point and I think it's valid. But... I don't know of anyone else that could, if presented right, capture the swing voters in that crucial demographic of middle-aged males that MC could. He did lose. Can't argue with that. But, it was a really dirty race. They linked images of OBL with MC on TV ads. The whole Washington DC sniper thing was diverting people at the time...It's just my somewhat educated and considered opinion that MC would make a dynamite VP with JK. You are entirely welcome to disagree...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hellhathnofury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
11. Write in:
Senator Tom Harkin of Iowa

-Midwest

-Help Bring Dean people back into the fold

-Expierenced

-Folksy-the opposite of patrician-Kerry

-Liberal

-Would be replaced by a Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. I always liked him.
I didn't include him because he didn't do well in the last poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hellhathnofury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. If Harkin get's it by some miracle I'll hop on the bandwagon in a second.
He would be a great pick for Kerry because he would counter the insider-sold out image and would certainly help in Ohio and Missouri. Plus he's not a stiff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. I can't stand Harkin
I think he's a smarmy pol!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hellhathnofury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #18
31. Well...most are.
I still like him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
14. none of the above
I don't personally support him, but Clark is a better choice than anyone on that list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Of course.....
You are 1000% right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VOX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 02:50 AM
Response to Original message
20. Good folks here, but for VP material, the list is severely uninspiring...
I see no name on this roster that can bring anything significantly inspiring to the ticket.

Sorry, but that's my nickel's worth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 03:38 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Whoever is picking Bayh
Its a joke. This guy voted for the war, Bush's Tax cuts, And ABORTION. No chance he is a VP candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lojasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 05:43 AM
Response to Original message
22. Any of these people
Will kill the democratic ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hav Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
23. wtf
Where can I vote for Osama Bin Laden? Cause I really want to vote against Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. huh?
Does not compute
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
25. Clark is an International Candidate

He has international appeal,not regional. I think it was unfair for people to label him a Southerner. He was born in Chicago, went to school in Arkansas and then lived all over the world stage.

His WORLD experience is so much broader then just to be from the South.

I wish there could be a 21st Century Vision to how a person is selected for VP. Isn't it better to have traveled all over the world, speak several languages,connected to people of all groups?

What is so special about living in one place all your life? How does that give you a perspective?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nashyra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. Surprisingly enough
On MSNBC I could not believe that the trailer for Hardball which was about the hunt for a VP they had a picture of Clark, Edwards and Gephart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
27. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
28. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
29. How about Kucinich?
At least there would be ONE Liberal on the ticket. Harkin would also be acceptable. No other worthless DLC shitballs though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. that would help with Ohio
If we want Ohio someone like DK would help. Harkin another pro labor midwesterner. Kerry-Kucinich would be fine with me, after Kucinich-????? that would be my dream ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
30. Graham was a real attack dog when he was running.
Graham Alleges a 9/11 'Coverup'
Democratic Florida senator, running for the presidency, says intelligence failures are being kept secret, endangering Americans
by Josh Meyer


WASHINGTON — Sen. Bob Graham on Sunday accused the Bush administration of engaging in a "coverup" of intelligence failures before and after the Sept. 11 attacks to shield it from embarrassment, and said the war with Iraq has allowed Al Qaeda and other terrorist groups to become a greater threat to Americans than ever before.

Graham, a presidential candidate and former chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, also accused the administration of jeopardizing the safety of Americans by blocking the release of a landmark congressional report on the government failures that preceded the attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon. The Florida Democrat said the White House has withheld from the public important information about the continued existence of terrorist cells in the United States — including some with ties to foreign governments that the U.S. has been afraid to go after.

"By continuing to classify that information the American people have been denied important information for their own protection, for the protection of the communities," Graham said on CBS News' 'Face the Nation.' "Local agencies have been denied information which would help them be more effective. First responders and the American people do not have the information upon which they can hold the administration and responsible agencies accountable," Graham said, adding: "I call that a coverup."

Even before announcing his candidacy for president last week, Graham had been outspoken in criticizing the Bush administration's record on counter-terrorism, saying its focus on war with Iraq has allowed Al Qaeda to regroup and Hezbollah and other terrorist networks to flourish. But Sunday's remarks appeared to be the first time that Graham has publicly accused the White House of trying to cover up such ongoing threats — and its own intelligence failures — by refusing to declassify information about them. Graham said he was basing his accusations on classified information he has received as a ranking member of the Senate intelligence committee, and as a leader of last year's joint congressional inquiry into the Sept. 11 attacks.

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/0512-04.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC