Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama would Transform and Open the Government in Ways Clinton NEVER Will

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 03:55 PM
Original message
Obama would Transform and Open the Government in Ways Clinton NEVER Will
GIVING GOVERNMENT BACK TO THE PEOPLE

(1) SUNLIGHT BEFORE SIGNING: Too often bills are rushed through Congress and to the
president before the public has the opportunity to review them. As president, Barack
Obama will not sign any non-emergency bill without giving the American public an
opportunity to review and comment on the White House website for five days. In
addition to ensuring that the public has the ability to review legislation, the sunlight will
help ensure that earmarks tucked into appropriations bills are exposed. And Obama will
sign legislation in the light of day without attaching signing statements that undermine
the legislative intent.

(2) 21ST CENTURY FIRESIDE CHATS: People who care deeply about issues in Washington
but live outside the beltway rarely have the opportunity to question and interact with
government agencies. Messages are filtered through the media, and many times the hard
questions are not asked. Barack Obama will bring democracy and policy directly to the
people by requiring his Cabinet officials to have periodic national broadband town hall
meetings to discuss issues before their agencies. The Internet makes it possible to take
our leaders directly to the people. If this is possible then it should also be mandatory.

(3) RESTORE MEANING TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT: The American
people deserve to know what their government does and why. Ours is an open
government, and our ability to understand our government at work--the freedom of
information we enjoy--has been copied by other countries around the world. The
Freedom of Information Act is a pillar of our open government. Unfortunately, in recent
years our government has failed to keep the American people informed about what it was
doing and why, and it has refused to provide Americans with information they are
entitled to by law. Turning our tradition of free information upside down, the Bush
administration has instructed agencies to presume citizens are not entitled to information
unless they are willing to sue for it. Barack Obama would restore the tradition of free
information by issuing an Executive Order that information should be released unless an
agency reasonably foresees harm to a protected interest.

(4) CONDUCT REGULATORY AGENCY BUSINESS IN PUBLIC: Every day, government
agencies make decisions that impact the lives of Americans. These decisions require
public deliberation and input. But at many agencies, these deliberations are conducted
out of the public view. For example, several agencies, including the Securities &
Exchange Commission and the Federal Communications Commission, hold public
meetings only one or two days a month. On all the other days, the commissioners and
staff members host lobbyists and lawyers in private meetings, and operate outside of the
public eye. In these private meetings, companies can make their case for the regulation
that they want. Average citizens cannot participate in this process, and consumer groups
just do not have the resources to offset the waves of corporate lobbyists that constantly
walk the halls of these agencies.

Barack Obama will require his appointees who lead the Executive Branch departments
and rulemaking agencies to conduct the significant business of the agency in public, so
that any citizen can see in person or watch on the Internet as the agencies debate and
deliberate the issues that affect American society. Videos of meetings will be archived
on the web, and the transcript will be available to the public. Obama will also require his
nominees to commit to employ all the technological tools available to allow average
citizens not just to observe, but to participate and be heard on the issues that affect their
daily lives.

(5) MAKING WHITE HOUSE COMMUNICATIONS PUBLIC: Barack Obama would amend
Executive Order 12866 to ensure that communications about regulatory policymaking
between persons outside government and all White House staff are disclosed to the
public. The Obama White House would invoke its executive privilege to protect the
confidentiality of communications concerning national security and similar traditionally
sensitive matters, not to withhold information about private interests’ communication on
regulatory policy. There are communications that should be kept private because
disclosure could endanger the public. But the White House is the people’s house and the
people have a right to know who visits.

(6) RELEASING PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS: Under the Presidential Records Act,
presidential records are supposed to be released to the public 12 years after the end of a
presidential administration. In November 2001, President Bush issued an order that gave
current and former presidents and vice presidents broad authority to withhold presidential
records or delay their release indefinitely. As president, Barack Obama will nullify the
Bush order and establish procedures to ensure the timely release of presidential records.

(more...)

http://www.barackobama.com/pdf/TakingBackOurGovernmentBackFinalFactSheet.pdf">Here

And people have the nerve to say he's not Progressive!! This is clearly an issue he and Clinton are seperate on. She will NEVER do this!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rageneau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Obama is God.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Hillary Clinton doesn't even want to release her earmarks,,,lol
I vaguely remember one debate where she even defended a more private and secretive government when Open Government was brought up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. the Clintons also won't release their tax returns
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. ...
:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm a big fan of sunlight on the process and I approve Obama's message.
It is clear Clinton II will allow Bush II's crimes to slide just like Clinton I did for Bush I.

It's all in the family, doncha know?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REDFISHBLUEFISH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. And who would pardon Rezko to protect himself...Very DUBYAH LIKE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Did you know Denise Rich donated millions to the ClintonLibrary after the Clinton's pardoned her
NeoCon consorting husband?

You shouldn't bring up pardons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. You have no evidence for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
27. Thanks, aquart.
I appreciate your defending of the truth regardless of who benefits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. Marc Rich was a named figure in IranContra and BCCI. Did Bill tell you that?
Edited on Thu Jan-31-08 04:48 PM by blm
Nope. The gullible wing of the Democratic party believed Bill pardoned a mere tax evader.

Scooter Libby was Rich's lawyer throughout that time BECAUSE Rich was a BFEE operative that needed protection.

Nice of Bill to be so generous to Poppy Bush, eh? Nice of Bill to hide Rich's REAL activities from Democrats he judged correctly he could fool....easily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErnestoG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. Great post. It won't go anywhere with the zombies, though.
They prefer their memes to facts. Just giving you a heads up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I expect them to avoid this thread like a plague though
Basically, if it's not a baiting troll post or a poll thread...if it's something about REAL ISSUES...then they avoid it. Especially when Clinton doesn't believe in Open Government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
22. Go to govt. corruption thread, Sibel Edmonds or BCCI thread - they stay away in DROVES.
Edited on Thu Jan-31-08 05:02 PM by blm
That should tell you something.

They love to pretend Rezko matters more to national security than Jackson Stephens ...... heh. Sad, though, actually. Ignorance of these matters led this country DIRECTLY to Bush2.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IronLionZion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Fuck the zombies. I read it, and I appreciate it.
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Thanks...this is Obama's Progressivism shining through!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
styersc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
12. Except that it is very unlikely this nation will elect such a young...
...inexperienced man. If Obama is the candidate, we will have to hope that John McCain is willing to make these changes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. You mean young and inexperienced like Bill Clinton? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Have you listened to McCain, lately?
He doesn't have a chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. You DO realize that Obama is older than Bill Clinton and JFK were right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hayu_lol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. There is nothing in Obama's record to indicate that he would be for open...
government. Nothing. As a matter of fact, the gobbleygook you mention about all bills being on a White House website so that the public can read them in advance and react/respond smacks suspiciously like Obama's trenchant for voting present to avoid making decisions of yes/no.

He does have a long history of waiting until there are polls to read to tell him what to decide.

We hire a president to make decisions. Whether those decisions are good/bad is up to the historians. Obama has shown no ability to say yes/no to anything. Waiting for public response to tell him what to do makes him a high-placed flunky.

For all his intelligence and academic achievements, Obama does not inspire this voter in the area of decision making.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Better he seeks consul from minds like Gary Hart, Al Gore and John Kerry rather than
Poppy Bush, eh?


http://consortiumnews.com/2006/111106.html
Yep - that whole Bush-Clinton secrecy and privilege protection racket IS closed government at its worst.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magatte Donating Member (323 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. That is a bold-faced Lie. He personally sponsored a bill to publish all government spending online.
http://obama.senate.gov/news/060926-obamas_first_la/

You are disigenuous and a criminal liar. That is what's wrong with the current batch or people in power. I am sad that you want to perpetuate this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
23. does hillary have any experience sitting in that office at that desk
and taking the responsibilty for what she does that will effect hundreds of millions of people? does she have the experience to deal with the house and senate that will treat her as an outsider?

no she does`t and neither has anyone else that is running for president
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
18. Whatta bunch of crap.....
Such promises are for the really naive. No elected official wants to "open government". But believe him if it makes you feel better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
21. ideas change when one sits in the big chair
and realize that there`s "the hill" they have to convince. obama or hillary will do just fine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Wayne_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
25. Yawn...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Are we keeping you awake? Maybe you need a little nap. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC