Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How is Rezko any different from Hillary's latest "scandal"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 02:29 PM
Original message
How is Rezko any different from Hillary's latest "scandal"?
If I was Hillary, I'd advise her not to bring up Rezko again. Obama has some ammo now.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/31/us/politics/31donor.html?_r=1&ref=politics&oref=slogin

Mr. Nazarbayev walked away from the table with a propaganda coup, after Mr. Clinton expressed enthusiastic support for the Kazakh leader’s bid to head an international organization that monitors elections and supports democracy. Mr. Clinton’s public declaration undercut both American foreign policy and sharp criticism of Kazakhstan’s poor human rights record by, among others, Mr. Clinton’s wife, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York.

Within two days, corporate records show that Mr. Giustra also came up a winner when his company signed preliminary agreements giving it the right to buy into three uranium projects controlled by Kazakhstan’s state-owned uranium agency, Kazatomprom.

The monster deal stunned the mining industry, turning an unknown shell company into one of the world’s largest uranium producers in a transaction ultimately worth tens of millions of dollars to Mr. Giustra, analysts said.

Just months after the Kazakh pact was finalized, Mr. Clinton’s charitable foundation received its own windfall: a $31.3 million donation from Mr. Giustra that had remained a secret until he acknowledged it last month. The gift, combined with Mr. Giustra’s more recent and public pledge to give the William J. Clinton Foundation an additional $100 million, secured Mr. Giustra a place in Mr. Clinton’s inner circle, an exclusive club of wealthy entrepreneurs in which friendship with the former president has its privileges.


If Obama's campaign plants this a day before Super Tuesday, it could really hurt her the next day. Will Obama sink to Karl Rove-ian circa 2000 politics? Who knows, but I wouldn't put it past him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Too many consonants. Hard to follow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I hear you
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunonmars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. but Hillary aint running a campaign on being a clean politician, big difference
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. You're joking, right?
Hillary is indeed running on the premise of being a clean politician, or else she wouldn't be in the race right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunonmars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Oabam's running a campaign like he's a saint and he's as corrupt as anyone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REDFISHBLUEFISH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. EXACTLY, if you base your campaign on being different, You best be different. It appears Obams isn't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. For one thing it doesn't look like a direct link as in Clinton praises the guy
Edited on Thu Jan-31-08 02:42 PM by saracat
for no appointment to head the election monitoring ,then he buys uranium projects from his government, and then he donates millions to the Clinton Foundation. Way more degrees of separation .It seems apples to oranges. And all presidential libraries and foundations have such donors.This was considered a big yawn in August and is no.Rezco has an honest to god indictment of a man Barak had a 17 year relationship with and the NYTimes and ABC have discovered Barack did not tell the truth about his being given presidential donations from a party under federal investigation and the return of those monies.He also"boneheaded" or not participated in a real estate transaction with this man. Rezco, in Baracks own words, made it possible for Barack to buy his house. The tie is much more direct. Just saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC