|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
glarius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 02:25 PM Original message |
Why isn't Hillary mentioning that she has Robt. Kennedy Jr. and others of his family endorsing her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maddiejoan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
1. RFK Jr |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glarius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 02:28 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. But we never see or hear of him on TV. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 02:30 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Perhaps because Clinton values endorsements in a more dignified manner |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maddiejoan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 02:30 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. As any Edwards supporter might attest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
avrdream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 03:26 PM Response to Reply #9 |
27. Exactly, maddie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maddiejoan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
2. dupe delete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sunonmars (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 02:27 PM Response to Original message |
3. She has and the media doesnt want to know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glarius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 02:29 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. It sounds like the media is purposely not reporting this then. IMO n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 02:29 PM Original message |
It would look petty - and MSM wouldn't give this the same attention anyway |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glarius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 02:31 PM Response to Original message |
11. She wouldn't have to handle it like that.....She could say "I'm happy to have Robert etc." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
5. I have been wondering too. RFK jr is a huge endorsement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Exultant Democracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
7. Ted Caroline and Pat are far more high profile. Clinton does mention it, but the MSM doesn't care. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killbotfactory (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 02:31 PM Response to Original message |
10. She has mentioned it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glarius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 03:01 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. Old news? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 03:06 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. November of last year... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glarius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 03:09 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. That's irrelevant. The point is he endorsed her...along with Kathleen and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 03:21 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. What is irrelevant? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glarius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 03:25 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. I'm just saying whether it was November or yesterday, the thing is he endorsed her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 02:31 PM Response to Original message |
12. Because Ted Kennedy is about eight thousand times more important |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MediaBabe (610 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 03:24 PM Response to Reply #12 |
24. Caroline is well known, huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 03:26 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. She's written a few best-selling books |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 02:33 PM Response to Original message |
13. Corporate mediawhores owned by the rightwing doesn't want you to know...they want Obama because they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glarius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 03:29 PM Response to Reply #13 |
29. I have been thinking this also. I can't see the south electing a Black person |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 02:33 PM Response to Original message |
14. Because RFK Jr. just wants her Senate seat. He already said so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maximusveritas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 03:03 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Really? Do you have a link? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 03:42 PM Response to Reply #16 |
34. Yep, here it is. "If Hillary left the Senate, I might run for that seat." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 03:44 PM Response to Reply #34 |
37. Yes, but you notice he didn't specify what he meant by "that seat". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 05:44 PM Response to Reply #37 |
51. It seemed pretty obvious to me. He means Hillary's senate seat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 03:05 PM Response to Original message |
17. Because RFK Jr.'s embarassing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 03:10 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. Why do you say he's a kook? Seriously... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 05:29 PM Response to Reply #21 |
46. The mercury in vaccines nonsense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 05:38 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. How is he out there? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 05:41 PM Response to Reply #47 |
48. That it's sapping our precious bodily fluids. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 05:43 PM Response to Reply #48 |
50. Right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glarius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 03:13 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. He has been up here in Canada many times and I have been impressed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 03:30 PM Response to Reply #17 |
31. Well no, except to DLC centrists n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 03:07 PM Response to Original message |
19. Oh HELL yes! Robert's endorsement speaks VOLUMES about which is the better on the environment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 03:30 PM Response to Reply #19 |
30. Except she's not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 03:38 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. Sorry... I don't go by ratings or scorecards... they're useless. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 03:45 PM Response to Reply #32 |
38. He's a co-sponsor to Boxer-Sanders Global Warming Act |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 03:50 PM Response to Reply #38 |
41. Votes... not sponsorship... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 04:15 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. Without a mandate for real change |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MBS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 03:43 PM Response to Reply #30 |
35. you got that right n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 03:28 PM Response to Original message |
28. Why doesn't she tout RFK's endorsement? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 03:43 PM Response to Reply #28 |
36. Or maybe she does, but it's not front page, above-the-fold worthy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 04:21 PM Response to Reply #36 |
44. campaign ads are easy to find |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 05:08 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. I honestly just don't care enough to look... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MediaBabe (610 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 03:38 PM Response to Original message |
33. Over 200 prominent Democrats have endorsed Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 05:44 PM Response to Reply #33 |
52. "in spite of all the hype Obama has only half the endorsements Clinton has" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glarius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 06:03 PM Response to Reply #52 |
54. I think the corporate media wants Obama because they don't think he can win. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 06:05 PM Response to Reply #54 |
56. Maybe... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glarius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 06:11 PM Response to Reply #56 |
57. I can understand your feelings. It must be so difficult to know what to do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodgd_yall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
39. I'm wondering about that too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigwillq (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
40. It's been mentioned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aka-chmeee (188 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
43. Maybe she wants to spare him from being crucified |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ErnestoG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 05:42 PM Response to Original message |
49. Because it will make all her bots flipping boogers at Ted Kennedy out to look like idiots |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 05:46 PM Response to Original message |
53. She doesn't brag. Obama does. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 06:05 PM Response to Reply #53 |
55. She has nothing to brag about. Obama does. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 09:04 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC