Should Hillary or Obama Run An Ad During The Superbowl?

[THUNDER HANDS]

Do you think that would be smart? Or would people be turned off by politics during a sporting event?

[napi21]

1. NO! WAY too expensive and wouldn't accomplish enough. n/t

[GodlessBiker]

2. No politics during the Superbowl! Just sex and wardrobe malfunctions, please!

[TeamJordan23]

3. Fox already said they will not carry any political ads during the Super Bowl

Rumor was that Ron Paul's people wanted to put one up.

[MadBadger]

6. Not entirely true. Obama bought a local ad in Boston. That is allowed.

[Zueda]

4. I read that Obama already has bought an ad during the game

in the Boston area. Both Obama and Clinton have buys just before the game. But FOX said no national buys allowed.

[Egnever]

5. They cant

fox isnt alowing them

[MadBadger]

7. Obama bought a local ad in the Boston Area.

[Colobo]

9. Good!

[SteppingRazor]

8. Might as well -- the Bowl is already going to be politicized.

FOXSports To Inject FOXNews Anchors, Politics Into Super Bowl Coverage
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/01/17/foxsports-to-inject-foxnews-anchors-politics-into-super-bowl-coverage/

[Renew Deal]

10. It would have to be a hell of an ad

It's extremely expensive. Also, the network might now air it.

[Perky]

11. No but someone should ask Hillary who she wants to win

So she can piss off thoe Massachusetts voters.
Go Patriots.

[TheDeathadder]

12. No

it's the superbowl...it's like talking politics or religion at a party...never turns out well. and EXPENSIVE!!

[onehandle]

13. Gore should. "I'm In!" nt

[4_TN_TITANS]

14. Let Bud put them in a comercial.

They always have the best ones anyway. Maybe show each one in their respective locker rooms, gearing up for their game.