Remember, Dems lost in 2002 and 2004 because DNC never secured election process

[blm]

after 2000s blatant theft. Previous DNC chairs actually let the RNC gain control of the election process at every level where the votes are allowed, cast and counted - even AFTER many of the RNC's tactics were revealed in the hearings on 2000.

Do you feel confident that DNC has improved the long neglected state party infrastructures through Dean's 50 state strategy - infrastructures that had been collapsed for years by the previous party chairs' targeted state strategy?

Is 2008 a safer bet for Democratic candidates and voters than 2000, 2002 and 2004 were?

Looking forward to your replies.

[politicasista]

1. kick n/t

[robinlynne]

2. The two subjects: election proteciton and Dean's strategy have nothing to do

with one another.

As for election protection; the voting situation in the US is worse every day.

As for Dean's strategy: fantastic!

[blm]

3. Actually, I do believe votes are lost because of infrastructure weaknesses.

I think this was absolutely the case in Florida and Ohio where the Dem party, itself, was so weak and so bullied on those states they could not counter ALL the different types of vote theft and suppression that occurred.

[blm]

4. ^^

lest we forget and accept the spin from corpmedia.