Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Edwards didn't say "why " he was dropping out! What is the reason for that?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 01:41 PM
Original message
Edwards didn't say "why " he was dropping out! What is the reason for that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. i think it's fairly self evident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. He's stepping aside to let history take its course.
But I'm guessing his wife might have had a setback, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. History? Fuck that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Well, that's what HE said. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
39. I know it.And if he were here, I'd still say "Fuck that"I want no part of this history.
Edited on Wed Jan-30-08 03:39 PM by saracat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Well, I really don't know what to tell you. I wish he'd stayed in as well, but
I respect that he has his reasons, and I admire that he had the guts to make a tough call.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. I sincerely hope Elizabeth is well but his campaign was the antithisis of this making history crap
and it is insulting to those of us who supported him because we would NOT base our support on race or gender.That is all I m,eant.I think something else is going on, but as a supporter we should at least have been given some warning or an email.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. I heard about this yesterday morning.
You have to realize that most of those emails come from staffers. They aren't the candidate speaking to supporters, and it's just a tactic to make supporters feel "close" to the candidate. The candidate may say to a staffer like Trippi or a head writer "Send something out on the wire that says I think suchnsuch or that I'm going to do so-and-so." But it's not their words. Half the time they don't even know what went out, especially if it's boiler-plate from the stump speech.

Trippi was probably too busy looking to jump to one ship or another to bother telling someone to gin one up.

For all we know, Mrs. E got some horrible news and it's a shorter time to worse news than they previously thought. I can't blame JE for putting the wife first. I'd do the same if I were in his shoes. He realized he wasn't bringing it, so it does make sense to step aside...not TO LET HISTORY take its course, but AND let history take its course. Because that will happen, no matter what the end result is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #43
45.  Elizabeth is said to be doing fine. I don't think that is it.
There is a thread on a conference call that says what reason he is giving but it doesn't ring true.But hey, mkaes my life simpler. I can now concentate on other things!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. Not enough people were choosing him.
That's all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
27. plus he was being marginalized by the media
the media was pushing for a two candidate race for a long time. Maybe Rove is in the shadows????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. He'll endorse before next Tuesday. That's what it means. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. What did you expect him to say?
I'm out of money? I assume we'll know why he dropped out sooner or later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. I would say it's personal and thats very sad.
I hate to think of what the answer is. :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. My thoughts...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidwparker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
9. the closest he came was when he said he wanted to get of the way to
let history take its course (or to that effect). I took that to mean people are looking for the history making first woman or first black president.

it was not his message. It was the "rock" stars from the perspective of the media and what people are tuned into.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. That's a very vague phrase. I wonder what he was hinting at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #12
46. Just a guess, but I think the Ted and Caroline endorsement
made him think harder about the historic nature of this campaign. Seeing Obama linked to the Camelot mystique was powerful and suggested that sometimes we have to go with our longing for an inspiring, fresh political outlook. Caroline's new ad for Obama relives the JFK promise. Hearing her voice and seeing her speak is just very moving. New beginnings...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dragonlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. Just a thought
One wouldn't announce receiving a threat, would one? The sudden nature of this turnaround makes me wonder. And if anyone thinks about flaming me about defaming one of the other candidates, don't bother, because I'm not specifying the source of any possible threat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. well, whatever the reason, i feel numb--didn't he say he'd stay in until the end?
all other words tend to ring hollow w/me now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dragonlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Yes he did, and that's why I wonder what the real reason is
I believe he was genuinely committed to pushing his progressive platform as far as it would go, and the campaign was showing some signs of catching on recently--better fundraising, a little more attention in the media. There are interests that would find that dangerous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #21
34. his campaign was catching on and his on line donations were doing well
Edited on Wed Jan-30-08 03:06 PM by alyce douglas
they were supposed to start another fund drive today matter of fact, no his message was resonating out there, he was shut out of the media. I guess if you not team player you are put on the sidelines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
13. CNN reported Edwards aides saying it was lack of media coverage
in getting his message out to the people.
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. And he is right
look folks, the media has been playing king maker since 2000... and anybody shocked about this should have his or her head examined
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #13
30. maybe we should all send e mails to the networks, they need to hear from us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. That's a nice thought
But why would media parents like G.E. want to listen to a bunch of liberal progressives?

They make untold bundles by keeping themselves out of regulation, keeping the middle-class and lower-class concerns out of money and that money into their pockets, and by profiting from controlling the resources of the world with the war machine created on the backs of the poor, killing anyone who gets in their way?

Why would they listen to us? They haven't been yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #13
37. Yeah, they're the honest experts all right
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
14. did you expect him to say "Because the more people got to know me the more they came to dislike me"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. STFUHe was more likable than ALL the candidates and the more people saw him the more they liked.
Edited on Wed Jan-30-08 02:52 PM by saracat
It was just he was blocked out.Stick it where the sun don't shine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. sorry, i swear to gawd i thought i was responding to a "Why did Rudy drop out" thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #23
31. he was blocked out just like Dennis.
anyone who speaks the truth apparently does..sigh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midwest Progressive Donating Member (62 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
15. He finished third in his home state
That's a pretty good hint.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ncliberal Donating Member (131 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. His home state is NC.
He was born in SC. He lives here and has for decades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
16. Yes he did.....
to allow the Democratic party to make history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
19. Not enough delegates and money, and polling did not look good in future states
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
22. because he was doing so poorly
in the primaries. I thought it was pretty self-evident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. You would.You didn't undersand the nature of this campaign.
And to think I was considering supporting Hillary because I won't vote for Obama. I guess I'll leave well enough alone! Thank god I voted in the primary!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. What's offensive about I said?
Is it untrue? Is it a slam?

He did poorly. That's a fact, not a judgment.

And its just sad that *I* can sway your vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Yeah, isn't it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. well
there's no way in hell you were voting for Clinton anyway. You've made that very clear for a few months. You've been pretty nasty toward her and her supporters.

That being said, not voting for a candidate because of what *I* say is dumb. If you don't like me - and you don't - then don't vote for me. I am not my avatar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #29
35. You know , you never acknowledged any of my posts defending Clinton and just recently Bill
other Clinton supporters did and do.You see what you want to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #35
41. If you defended Clinton, thanks and good for you
I must not have seen them, or I would've thanked you then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
32. He probably didn't want to be reduced to running a Kucinich-like vanity campaign.
Which is what he would have looked like after Tuesday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
36. That's a good question.
I think Obama is slipping in the exit polls with "white voters".

Edwards did say suspended, and is on the ballot. So he will still take his delegates to the convention. And if he happens to have a few extra then so be it.

This N.H guy used his one vote to send delegates all the way to the convention! Yeeee haaaa!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tilsammans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
38. Maybe I’m naïve, but . . .
. . . I’m hoping something’s brewing behind the scenes with Edwards . . . something that would actually have a GOOD outcome.

But then I can dream, can’t I?

:cry:

All I know is that I will have a hard time voting for Hillary or Barack. They're just not doin' it for me the way JE did.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoveForPeace Donating Member (45 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
44. Hopefully nothing wrong with Elizabeth
I'm worried though
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC