|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
DemoTex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 08:17 PM Original message |
Craig Crawford (on Countdown) just hit the nail on the head: Kennedys vs. Clintons. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSparkle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 08:19 PM Response to Original message |
1. Me too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikekohr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 08:20 PM Response to Original message |
2. People before profit, principle before party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Proud2BAmurkin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 08:21 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. The "principle" of compromising with PUKES over fighting for your party's position |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 08:26 PM Response to Reply #5 |
14. Yep, Clinton's fatal error when he took office.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Proud2BAmurkin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 08:20 PM Response to Original message |
3. American history would disagree with idealism. Politics as usual has never been changed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackORoses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 08:21 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. so why even try, right? what a disgusting, undemocratic notion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Proud2BAmurkin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 08:23 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Why try to change the nature of politics? It's the nature of politics. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skidmore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 08:25 PM Response to Reply #3 |
12. Maybe it needs to be changed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
THUNDER HANDS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 08:25 PM Response to Reply #3 |
13. really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hisownpetard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 08:20 PM Response to Original message |
4. Yup. That sure seems to sum up their philosophies, doesn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Velveteen Ocelot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 08:22 PM Response to Original message |
7. That was interesting. And true, I think. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 08:22 PM Response to Original message |
8. Me too, DemoTex. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stray cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 08:24 PM Response to Original message |
10. Its not often I completely agree with the Kennedys but on this I do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avalux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 08:25 PM Response to Original message |
11. Clintons: the end justifies the means. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 08:28 PM Response to Original message |
15. Oversimplification: the best way to view anything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Celebration (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 09:35 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. Kennedy Obama Dynasty???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
silverweb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 08:30 PM Response to Original message |
16. That does seem to wrap it up neatly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
soleft (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 08:46 PM Response to Original message |
17. I saw that - a similar sentiment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 08:50 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC