Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So..., Election Hinges on TURNOUT. Will Clinton Campaign resort to disenfranchisement tactics?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:05 PM
Original message
So..., Election Hinges on TURNOUT. Will Clinton Campaign resort to disenfranchisement tactics?
Email from the Obama campaign has some interesting statistics about the SC election:

55% of the total vote, more than twice as many votes as any other candidate
57% of voters who had never voted in a primary
66% of voters who had never voted before at all
Every type of community -- urban, suburban, and rural
58% of voters between ages 18 and 64
67% of voters between ages 18 and 29

Writing on the wall says if new voters vote and turnout is good, that Obama is going to win. I've seen it done by GOP campaigns... they try to limit turnout and get voters to stay home (it happened with the phone-jamming scam in 2000 in NH). Will Clinton's campaign resort to getting voters to stay home?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Will the Obama campaign resort to disenfranchisement tactics
by declaring Clinton stole the election...if she wins...like they did in NH? Just wondering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golddigger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Heh...
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. TOUCHÉ! :-P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. It wasn't Obama supporters, it was election integrity folks who know to e-voting
machines to be inaccurate and the fact that John Silvestro and LHS had oversight of the process and memory cards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. And if Obama won would he have made that complaint public?
I think not! Only when it behooves them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. No e-voting machines are more notorious than South Carolina
They are Diebold without a paper trail. Obama exceeded "expectations" in SC by about 15 points, which is the same shift by which Hillary exceeded similar expectations in NH. New Hampshire uses a mix of voting technologies, most of which can be verified by a recount.

So why is it that so many people assumed that something could be wrong with the NH count but no one questions South Carolina. The double standards around here are staggering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. They're so crafty
20 years ago they aborted millions of babies - PERSONALLY, mind you! - just to depress turnout.

Surrender now - you can't beat that kind of evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. ROFL! That's funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kucinich4America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Now you're sounding just like Pat Robertson
Better stop that, before you endorse 9u11ani. Or worse yet, send yourself to Donnie McClurkin camp. :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. They pretty much have to, don't they?
I sincerely hope everyone gets their mind back before that impulse gets acted on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Wayne_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. Your statistics did nothing to support your loaded question
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC