WTF??? So now it's "your candidate's criminals are bigger criminals than my candidate's"?

[CatWoman]

:wtf:

[robbedvoter]

1. As fun as "My candidate's Kennedys are cooler than your candidate's Kennedys"

GD-P - learn to love it! :rofl:

[CatWoman]

5. did you see the latest Tom Tomorrow?

:rofl:

[robbedvoter]

6. I still think he didn't check our forum - we're funner!

[bidenista]

2. know hope

I'm giddy with the inspiration of it all.

[TechBear_Seattle]

3. Yup

All of the candidates without criminal backing have already been forced from the race because they were "unelectable."

What does that say about American politics?

[Tulkas]

4. Yes, it is a matter of degree, no politician is "pure" to many power hungry people trying to exploit

their position.

The difference is that Obama made one mistake that totaled 86k, While the Clintons have built a dynasty on lobbyists and power brokers. The China thing keeps coming back and Hillary already gave back 850,000. Almost 10X as much as Obama's Rezko problem.


Choosing the lesser evil is.... LESS EVIL!!!!

Choosing the greater evil is ....... well you know

[papau]

7. No - it is your candidate had a business relationship with crook - mine did not

[golddigger]

8. Brutal...

LMFAO!!!:rofl:

[Tulkas]

9. WHITEWATER

wtf is the matter with you ???


SHE CREATED A DOCUMENT FOR HER FIRM THAT WAS USED TO COMMIT FRAUD!!!

That is a proven fact, it can't be denied.

It is just not possible to prove that she knew it would be used that way, also can't be proved she did not know.



Your candidate was involved in committing fraud, mine was not.


Talk about a business relationship, Hillary Was Employed by a criminal!

[ieoeja]

12. I think he meant the same thing.

When he said "in business with", I assumed he meant the Clinton's investment in Whitewater. This is, as I note elsewhere, compounded by the fact that Clinton was also responsible for policing the activities in Whitewater.

So Rezmar is to Obama what Whitewater was to Clinton except that Obama was not invested in Rezmar and had no power/responsibility to police Rezmar.

[papau]

14. Clinton purchased a lot from the fellows development via a bank loan - not quite "in business with"

[papau]

13. She produced a standard document - no fraud on her part - why try to imply a lie?

[ieoeja]

11. Also regulatory oversight of the crook while he committed his crime - mine did not. n/t

[papau]

15. So Obama is responsible for all Federal Oversight errors - you are desperate

[ProSense]

10. What I find funny is how some people participate in questionable threads about Obama, then

whine when someone posts facts on Hillary. This is how Hillary is playing the game:

Fact Check: Sen. Obama Claims 'Nobody Had An Inkling' About Rezko


She is the last person who should be trumping up false accusations:

Obama comes clean, but Hillary's sleaze machine thrives

Has Hillary returned money bundled by Myron Cherry?

Clinton received $130,000 from same Rezko-linked lawyer Obama had to return money from.

[papau]

16. Rezko did not bundle the lawyers money for Clinton - and you know that - desperate shall we say?

[mtnsnake]

17. You must love this. It almost makes everyone forget how awful Kerry's campaign was

"I wanted John McCain for my VP, but I had to settle for Edwards" :evilgrin:

[CatWoman]

19. LOL

Who needs a fucking tv or cd player with DU:P around?

:hi:

[mtnsnake]

20. haha, it sure beats everything else, doesn't it

:evilgrin:

:hi:

[allinktup]

18. I gotta agree with you on this one

it's getting ridiculous.