Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did the Clintons learn anything in South Carolina?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:27 PM
Original message
Did the Clintons learn anything in South Carolina?
Question of the day: What, if anything, did Hillary and Bill Clinton learn from the drubbing they received Saturday in the South Carolina Democratic primary?

Yes, we know, Bill is not on the ballot but this primary election has become as much a referendum on the former President and his campaign tactics as it is on his wife's race for the White House. His rough-and-tumble, take-no-prisoners style has rankled rank and file Democrats and led to calls that he either tone down the campaign rhetoric or just shut up and go away.

Clinton's enormous ego, however, will never allow him to do either and -- for now at least -- his wife appears content to let him play bad cop in their quest to return to the White House as a roles-reversed power couple.

But South Carolina voters sent the Clintons a message of repudiation Saturday, a stern warning that the politics of divisiveness doesn't play along with a clear message that they want a candidate that unites, not divides, a nation.

http://www.capitolhillblue.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Based on the Jesse Jackson comment I would say no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neutron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. Obama Operatives have been Smearing Bill
for Months.
Their pattern is to attack, then Whine. Go back over the
last few weeks:
"Walmart"
"Slumloard"
"Boo Hoo! The Clintons are picking on me! "

I"m trying to figure how long this is going to work for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. They don't need to. He's doing a fine job all by himself. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. Bill Clinton , "Obama put a hit on me..." Who's the REAL whiner?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. You know, in fairness to the Clintons, the media (as usual) extracted the
flammable bits and fanned the flames. That's all we heard about -- WILL THIS HURT HILLARY? I'm pretty sure he's attracted some voters and HAS been an asset to her a great deal of the time, but as usual, we're being shown what will get us talking and bring in ratings.

I'm not saying some of the things he said were unfortunate, but jeez -- in the big picture, they all do it.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. When I heard the comment, in context - before I heard any other commentary on it...
I about fell out of my chair. I honestly could not believe he had the nerve to say that.

And now they got a slap from the Kennedy's - but unfortunately, I don't think they've learned a thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Bill is the consummate expert on the media, he knew how to give them the story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. DLC Cliontonian mantra: The Clintons are GODS it's alway's someone else's fault!
Wash. Rinse. Repeat. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neutron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Bill was right on target
That really bothers you, doesn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. I'm cursed by always seeing both sides of the picture, that's all.
I don't even remotely have a dog in this race. This was not a defense of the Clintons, but just an observation by a neutral observer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. I seriously believe Bill needs to go back to being a cheerleader, a positive
voice, for his wife, and leave the other candidates alone. Big, big blunder on many levels for him to become so enmeshed in her campaign. First, it makes her look like she can't win on her own, when she certainly proved that she can--when he wasn't as visible, she was far and away the frontrunner last summer and fall. Second, it makes him look like HE'S the one who really wants to get back into the WH--the third term of the Clinton Presidency. This will not sit well with anybody. Third, we're reminded of what we DIDN'T like about him, and about their politics and tactics, when they double-team Obama and when Bill goes into his egotistical finger-wagging red-faced scold mode. Bad memories conjured up. He totally needs to back off and let her shine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neutron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. This was an election about race
Edited on Sun Jan-27-08 01:45 PM by neutron
because it was to Obama's political advantage to make it that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. I use to think these people were fabulous, taking my oldest to see Bill and
working our way up to the first five rows of people to get a closer view. I wouldn't spend a plug nickle to see him now for the damage he has done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
8. Well. he's got the media and us talking about him and not about her.
We're blaming him for the loss, not her. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. Not me. clearly that is her leadership failure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. more cow bell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
11. I don't agree with your premise. The question is did the voters learn anything
from the last time the media got a guy elected (hint: bush).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
12. South Carolina is a deep red state that will vote Republican in the GE.
I congratulate Obama on his primary win in SC, but it won't change the fact that the state will go Republican in the GE. In fact, a number of the folks who voted for Obama yesterday will vote for the Republican in the GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. With the huge Democratic-Turn out in SC, I don't buy it!
Uncle KKKarl, is that you? :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Wait and see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Until they have decent verifiable election systems, how do we know?
:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. looking at the numbers, more dems turned out for this primary than all repugs combined.
There is a possiblity that he can bring out enough dems to overtake a red state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. That would be wonderful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
22. Once you take away all the bias reporting anti clinton and pro
obama then south carolina might have actually meant something. But the question I have is, What did Obama win? Did the majority of blacks turn out to vote based on skin color only? Did the majority of blacks vote for Obama because he was the better qualified person? Did the media play a major part in his win? Did the media create with the help of the obama camp the black backlash against the clintons? Did the media pound and pound away at Bill Clinton to cover up the facts the obama campaign were the ones which played the race card? Did the media create the bogus "only 10% whites would vote for obama", so the media could in their exit polling show that obama got a bigger share of white voters so the main story was not obama receiving 70 plus percent of the black vote?

Lots of questions to be asked but will never be answered, but that was sooooooooooooo yesterday and again I ask what did Obama win?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
25. frankly, i think they're going to have to go negative (and those of you who think
they've already gone negative, haven't seen anything yet), because the truth is, it doesn't matter what 'tone' their campaign takes, they will be bashed by the media and obama supporters anyway. therefor, they are going to have to deliver some serious blows to the obama camp, because it's clear that the media won't do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC