Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Barak Obama's Agenda Can't Leapfrog Bill Clinton's Legacy to Success

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:08 AM
Original message
Barak Obama's Agenda Can't Leapfrog Bill Clinton's Legacy to Success
Edited on Sun Jan-27-08 11:13 AM by bigtree

Eugene Robinson said on MSNBC, while watching SC primary returns, that when Barak Obama passed over Bill Clinton's presidential legacy and expressed admiration for the Ronald Reagan model presidency, he was telling us that he intended to forge his own, unique legacy in office which transcended the Clinton years. Certainly, Obama intended to do more than cast the republican icon in a favorable light, or, cast the former Democratic president as a failure.

What Obama meant is that he wants a presidency which arrives in Washington with the same type of mandate Reagan assumed he had when he took power. That's the theme of his coalition appeal which encourages republican voters to 'cross the line' and join in his campaign like 'Reagan Democrats' did for republicans.

It would be foolish for any progressive who has any interest at all in advancing their agenda to wish away the fine words Obama has offered in this campaign about hope, change, and unity. It's certainly hard to imagine any progressive who would not be able to embrace every eloquent verse of the senator's victory speech he delivered after his shattering victory in S.C. over his two rivals.

"Yes, we can heal this nation." Obama told his celebrating supporters last night."

Yes, we can seize our future. And as we leave this great state with a new wind at our backs, and we take this journey across this great country, a country we love, with the message we've carried from the plains of Iowa to the hills of New Hampshire, from the Nevada desert to the South Carolina coast, the same message we had when we were up and when we were down, that out of many we are one, that while we breathe we will hope, and where we are met with cynicism and doubt and fear and those who tell us that we can't, we will respond with that timeless creed that sums up the spirit of the American people in three simple words: Yes, we can," Obama said.

It's infinitely more believable that Americans can be inspired to support and defend progressive change than it is to believe Obama's suggestion that Reagan inspired anyone to anything meaningful -- anything beyond his supporters' own greed and scapegoating -- or, beyond his ability to exploit the weaknesses and fears of legislators who had once pledged allegiance to the voters, but had found better currency in allegiances with the moneyed benefactors who would perpetuate them in power.

It's an offer to inspire, the way Reagan was fabled to have done, which Obama is selling in his campaign. Moreover, he's telling us that he represents a "new generation" -- which is poised to provide the backbone for his presidential revolution.

"This election is about the past versus the future," Obama said. "It's about whether we settle for the same divisions and distractions and drama that passes for politics today or whether we reach for a politics of common sense and innovation, a politics of shared sacrifice and shared prosperity.

In this effort, Obama would need a nation to be fully mobilized behind him as he moved to challenge Congress to enact his agenda. He would need the nation to remain energized behind his efforts. He would need the nation to ultimately accept that his remedies have actually made a difference in their lives enough to support him through whatever adversity or balance of legislative power confronts him.

Reagan's appeal was a con. He didn't believe in government for the people and he preyed on the cynicism Americans have in their representatives to effect the changes they want; changes which he subsequently, methodically obstructed.

For a better model, I would suggest Obama take another look at the presidency of Bill Clinton. If a Democrat's elected, it's a fantasy to expect that the republican opposition is going to lay down their arms and join our party in a group hug on inauguration day. Bill Clinton took as much heat from the republican opposition as any president has, in history, over trivialities and inventions over his personal affairs, past and present. And, he prevailed.

There has been absolutely no evolution in the practices or philosophy of the present republican class of legislators which would suggest any devolution from their divide and conquer strategy. Already emboldened by over a decade of wanton disregard of democratic principle, practice, or comity, the republicans will not stand still and allow Obama unfettered access as he sets about dismantling their anti-democratic constructions.

What Bill Clinton had, was a 'laser-like' ability to push aside all of the personal attacks and convey to the American people that it was their agenda he was focused on -- not the manufactured scandals, character attacks, and political squabbles which the republicans and the obliging media were hard selling. That should be the lesson Barak Obama carries into the remaining campaign, and, if fortunate, on to the White House. Most Democrats proudly point to the former two-term president's record of accomplishments as they seek to build their own legacy. It was an amazing period of economic growth and opportunity, despite the unceasingly lurid displays of the prosecutorial republican opposition.

Hillary will benefit, as well, as she moves through the rest of the campaign, from recalling and applying the lessons of her husband's laser focus on the needs and concerns of the American people in his campaigns and in his presidency. All of the little points scored against one another by these candidates is good fodder for the pundits and entertainers on the news programs, but, for Obama's universally agreed upon desire to inspire the nation to get behind the changes he's advocating to work, he's going to need a Bill Clinton-like discipline in brushing off the scandalmongers and elevating the voters' agenda, above all else. Obama, and the other candidates, need to direct their full concentration to the voters' agenda, right now, instead of the type of political destruction which was practiced by all camps in the past few weeks.

We need that focus, too.


http://journals.democraticunderground.com/bigtree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. imo Obama should not have mentioned either Reagan or Clinton...
He still has some fence-mending to do within the party because of those statements, but Clinton's own behavior in the last few weeks has really clarified the choices we have ~ to go back or to go forward, and we won't beat the Republicans by going back.

I agree that Obama needs to focus on the voters' agenda ~ imo he should, as much as possible, let surrogates deal with any ugly business with the Clintons or Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. It's the squabbling which threatens to undermine his message, even if the outcome elevates him
whether he does the squabbling, or his surrogates. He needs to make his agenda the message of the day, not the intra-party bickering. (the others, too)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. True - his surrogates should correct the record in a clear sure way...
...and leave it at that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. .
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC