My Predictions!

[jpgpenn]

Kerry our nominee, Dick Gephardt(great guy) VP. Clark Sec. of State! ... and having Kuch. leading the way, while in office, with a message for the average everday working man!

What more does America need to get our legs back under us! Happy Times on the way!

:bounce: :kick: :bounce: :kick: :bounce: :kick: :bounce: :kick:

[mot78]

1. You got the right man at the top anyways

Gephardt will put people to sleep, and not only did he vote for the IWR, he was at the Rose Garden ceremony to watch * sign it.

[jpgpenn]

2. KICK

:kick:

[in_cog_ni_to]

3. Wes Clark as VP...... n/t

[jpgpenn]

4. Sec. of State is a much more...

prominent role for Clarks intellect! VP. honors are more of title then substance.

[in_cog_ni_to]

12. VP is the 2nd most

powerful position in the administration and is as important a role as the PRESIDENT wants it to be. If Kerry chooses Wes as a running mate, he won't waste his talents, mark my word.

[LandOLincoln]

68. Besides, Cabinet positions have to be approved

by the Senate--which, may I remind everyone, is currently under Repub control.

I don't think there's any way in hell they'd approve Wes Clark as SecState--certainly not without one of the bloodiest, most prolonged confirmation battles in the history of this country.

VPs, OTOH, are simply chosen by the nominee, and are not subject to confirmation by any other body. Plus, there's also no way in hell Clark would follow the now-outdated "wallflower" model as VP.

My prediction is that Kerry will put him in charge of cleaning up the Iraq mess, especially now that NATO has expressed an interest in getting more involved in the region. Clark has been pushing for NATO involvement in Iraq all along, and who better to facilitate that involvement than a former NATO Supreme Allied Commander?

http://news.ft.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=FT.com/StoryFT/FullStory&c=StoryFT&cid=1077690830526

[Eric J in MN]

5. Gephardt can appeal to people who are against NAFTA (nt)

nt

[jpgpenn]

7. Gephardt has been there for the working man ...

long before these amublance chasing low lifes entered the seen! Let's not forget it!

[JohnLocke]

13. Nice grammar.

"amublance" - ambulance? And if you're going to use the phrase "ambulance-chasing," it needs a hyphen.
"low lifes" - it's either "low-life" or "low-lives."
"seen" - do you mean "scene"?

[jpgpenn]

36. Thanks!

what I lack in grammar I more then make up in support of charitable orginzation!

[JohnLocke]

6. Edwards will make a geat veep.

[jpgpenn]

8. Why because the "MEDIA" says so...AGAIN!

I love my country to much. Go ask this fucking creep bastard why he hasn't done any Pro Bono work for these so called suffering people he now rallies for!:puke:

[Forkboy]

9. Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?

[jpgpenn]

11. go play with his dog!

[Forkboy]

17. right over your head

wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee :silly:

[JohnLocke]

24. LOL

Apparently Mr. Penn doesn't care for science very much.

[jpgpenn]

47. apparently over your's!

[Forkboy]

51. apparently not

[JohnLocke]

52. Uh...no. (by the way, another grammatical error)

It's "yours" (possessive).

[JohnLocke]

10. It's "too," not "to."

:eyes:

[jpgpenn]

14. Thanks for the grammar fix...

or in this case a mistype. Hell, I work my ass off for a living. As long as the message comes thru!

There will always be guys like you with enough time on your hands to find fault with guys like me!

[JohnLocke]

16. So, what do you do for a living? You must be an insurance adjuster.

:eyes:

[jpgpenn]

21. I do very well ...For a WORKING MAN!~

:toast:

[JohnLocke]

23. Yeah, whatever.

[jpgpenn]

31. Big whatever!

Hence why I support those that truly support real Americans and don't use them as a tool to riches!

America is now on it's way!

[JohnLocke]

33. Edwards does support real Americans.

You don't know what your talking about, do you? Tell you what: you read Four Trials, and then we can talk.

P.S. Yet another grammatical error -- "it's" (is is) should be "its" (possesive).

[Name removed]

40. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[JohnLocke]

44. Grammar is just a hobby of mine.

Trust me, I have a real job.

[jpgpenn]

50. I'm sure you do!

:puffpiece:

[Cuban_Liberal]

28. "Would you like fries with that, sir?"

What's Mickey D's paying for flipping fat burgers these days?

[jpgpenn]

32. you tell me!

:freak: m like shooting fish in a barrel!

[Cuban_Liberal]

Such a clever comeback.

:eyes:

[jpgpenn]

37. Clever and TRUE!

if you ever need a newly designed HVAC system! I'm the guy!

[Name removed]

39. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[jpgpenn]

41. ok? this from a kid named "forkboy" LOL

[JohnLocke]

42. You'll say anything, won't you?

:eyes: Whatever pops into some people's heads....

[jpgpenn]

53. No

[Cuban_Liberal]

58. Your posting proves otherwise.

'Scorched earth/take no prisoners' must be programmed into your computer....

[Name removed]

59. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[Name removed]

60. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[Forkboy]

61. is that a prediction?

:evilgrin:

[Cuban_Liberal]

64. Pretty much a sure thing.

Even his fellow Clark supporters disavow him... :evilgrin:

[Forkboy]

54. well thanks for calling me kid

Always warms my heart at 36 :)

[Name removed]

56. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[Name removed]

63. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[JohnLocke]

15. "fucking creep bastard" -- LOL.

Edwards has worked for his entire life standing up for justice, -- in his twenty years in law, and in his five years in the Senate. I won't have the likes of you slandering his name.

[jpgpenn]

18. for at least %30 of the take!

:puke:

[JohnLocke]

20. Got a link? (nt)

[jpgpenn]

25. don't need one!

my friend as a supporter of the guy, if you aren't aware of his past postions , I'm Not Surprised!

P.S. Try Google, wont take ya long!

[JohnLocke]

26. In other words, you can't prove any of your slanderous statements.

[jpgpenn]

34. can't prove? do the "WORK" yourself!

shit friend, everyone else knows this already! You supported this guy? :scared:

[Cuban_Liberal]

35. YOU made the statement.

YOU bear the burden of backing it up, buckaroo...

[Forkboy]

38. I'm not an Edwards supporter and I dont know that already

could you provide the information you used to reach your conclusions?

[jpgpenn]

43. guess you never will!

[JohnLocke]

45. Keep laughing.

:eyes:

[jpgpenn]

55. OK

:kick:

[Cuban_Liberal]

46. And you DON'T, or you would have supported the statement.

It's a damned lie, and you know it, so now you're covering being called on it with juvenile insults.

[JohnLocke]

48. Misplaced response.

[JohnLocke]

49. Hell, that demeans juveniles.

[Forkboy]

57. no thanks to you

sheesh,some people's kids.A man asks for a little help and where does it get him? I expected better from such a hard workin' man as yourself.My widdle feelings are hurt by the fact that you can't back your shit up...I hate seeing people make fools of themslves this way.

[JohnLocke]

27. In other words, you can't prove any of your slanderous statements.

[Forkboy]

19. my prediction

3 out of every 4 of your threads will get locked.

[JohnLocke]

22. LOL

:yourock:

[Hippo_Tron]

29. Kucinich for Speaker of the House n/t

[JasonBerry]

30. Kerry-Kerrey -- n/t

[mike from ri]

62. yes bob kerrey of neb will be veep

what does "n/t" mean?

[Cuban_Liberal]

65. n/t = no text.

It's means there's nothing more than the subject line. Some people also use 'eom' (end of message).

[JasonBerry]

66. Welcome to DU Mike

n/t means that there is "no text" --- everything has been said in the subject line.

[JohnLocke]

67. Hello, Mike from RI!