Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

0 does not want Florida delegates seated

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 10:56 AM
Original message
0 does not want Florida delegates seated
will not join HRC in asking that Florida delegates be seated as well as Michigan.

Just said so on ABC This Week with George stephanopolousssss

As a Floridian , I want to say Thanks 0 for caring that everyone's vote be counted. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. They broke the rules
At the end of the day, do we REALLY want to be just like the lying, cheating, stealing, win-at-all-cost republicans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. Fl voters should be disenfranchised again because they wanted an earlier primary?
yeah, that makes sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. They were told that breaking party rules would mean they would lose their delegates.
They played hardball.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #16
51. Draconian rules that hurt the people. Sen. Clinton is asking them to reconsider. and Obama
should do also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #51
53. Once again - why did Hillary wait until NOW to ask this?
Doesn't really give much time for anyone to do any campaigning before Tuesday, does it?

Please, this isn't because Hillary is so damned concerned about Florida. If that were the case, she would have said something when the DNC announced its decision months ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #53
55. I already gave my response on that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #55
65. You sure as hell did
Basically you also don't give a shit about Florida actually getting to make an informed decision. You don't mind the fact that none of the candidates did any real campaigning in Florida because of the DNC decision. You don't care that voters in Florida didn't really get to know Obama or Edwards very much.

You're perfectly happy with Hillary relying on her name recognition to win Florida, and then righteously proclaiming that their votes should count. You're perfectly content with this blatant vote-grab. After all, according to your post below, she "out-woman-uvered" Obama, taking advantage of the fact that he wouldn't be campaigning in Florida.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #65
82. Obama has his national ads running. Enough said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #65
96. It's merely an Obama myth that the votes would count should the Florida delegates be seated.
Just like its an Obama myth that he was required to buy ads via a "national" plan, causing his national ads to broadcast deep into florida

Just like its an Obama myth that his people are not all over florida at major intersections waving Obama Campaign cards

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guruoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #65
121. Is this a "Vote grab" or merely inept campaign strategy on Obama's part?
IMHO, Obama's campaign has been caught snoozing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guruoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #53
116. With Hillary, if you snooze you lose.
Can we assume that your candidate has been caught napping on this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #116
124. Weeks ago I said that Hillary was fine even if she lost N Hampshire
because she'd win Michigan and all I got were "LOL's" since Michigan's votes won't count.

I said I believed Hillary would call for them to be seated before the convention and she'd get her way so as to not offend a large critical state. I got more "LOL's".

This situation actually calls out for a compromise where the delegates are seated but the votes either won't count or will be sent uncommitted or something.

It was stupid of the DNC to punish an important state and it is tacky for Hillary to call for them to be counted when she was the only one who ran I sure could see Hillary's challenge coming a mile away though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guruoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #124
126. At least you saw it coming.
Makes one wonder what the Obama camp was thinking.

Sorry, but from what I've gleaned from Madfloridian's blog, I'd have to fault
the FL Dems that regniged on the original agreement with national.
They fully knew what would happen going into this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #51
76. And rules which the party agreed to previously, with punishments they agreed to accept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #16
144. So an entire state of voters should be punished because of their elected officials?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
22. The rules that say rural lily-white microstatelets choose the president? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southern_dem Donating Member (587 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #22
70. SC
is lily white?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neutron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #70
101. Obama wants to piss off FLA for our national election?
Edited on Sun Jan-27-08 01:09 PM by neutron
This guy is clueless.
HRC is our Sharpest, Strongest Candidate.

Sorry Teddy is threatened by women who are
further along than he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnywishbone97 Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #70
135. SC is nothing
The real deal comes Feb 5 and California is HRC country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #135
138. I thought it was Schwartzenegger country! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #70
136. Iowa and New Hampshire. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #70
137. Thank you, and don't forget that two states will ROTATE.
But that wasn't good enough for Michigan and Florida.

They were going to go first and that was that.

Florida didn't CARE if their delegates were seated or not.

They screwed the voters of their OWN STATES.

IN COLLUSION with the GOP in BOTH CASES.

Now they are WHINING because the delegates might not get seated.



Personally, I've believed that they'll get seated
all along.

Now that Hillary is DEMANDING that they be seated though....

well she REALLY looks bad!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnywishbone97 Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #22
134. inhabited by a bunch of hillbilly corn farmers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
7 of 11 Donating Member (174 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. Move your primary up and stop breaking party rules.
N/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. But it's ok for Obama to break the rules and advertise in FL..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Way to spin Tellurian!
But i'd expect nothing else from you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #17
24. That's why I have him on ignore
Edited on Sun Jan-27-08 11:10 AM by L0oniX
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #24
43. "Igore" is for people who are afraid to discuss the issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #43
61. Igore was the hunch back who helped the Frankstein monster.
Of course you shouldn't be afraid of him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #61
93. my boo-boo. good catch. (too late to edit my spelling)
Edited on Sun Jan-27-08 12:46 PM by rodeodance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. And Hillary is campaigning at fund raisers. And you've been told those were national ads
Edited on Sun Jan-27-08 11:06 AM by cryingshame
multiple times.

Which Hillary and Edwards could have also done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #20
32. As you've been told, nationally, the station could have blocked FLA
they didn't!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #20
94. National Ads That can Block Any State
Rule breaking is rule breaking. CNN can block any state but Barack chose not to do that. Call it what you want but in my opinion it's not right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #13
56. You knock him for running national ads but he obviously doesn't
want any delegates from FL. You can't on one hand knock Obama for FL advertising(as though he wants the fl vote to matter) and then knock him on saying that he doesn't want the FL vote to matter. Which is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #56
98. Seating Florida delegates would not make the Florida vote count.
I would like to suggest that Obama supporters find out about this issue before they cause even more division with my Floridians. Otherwise one could assume you are just lying on purpose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. Be pissed off at your State Democratic Committee
They chose not to play by the rules, and the national party has punished them. Remember. Hillary was the one that said "Florida doesn't count" a few short months ago when she thought this was going to be a walk in her favor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
4. where would that leave Michigan?
do we suddenly have a do-over with Michigan, or only count the state of Florida because Hillary asked?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
5. your local party is at fault not "O"
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
6. Please tell me, why did HRC wait so long to ask that Florida delegates be seated?
Why wait until DAYS BEFORE THE PRIMARY, when nobody has been campaigning in Florida? If Hillary was so goddamned concerned about having a "fair" vote in Florida, why not demand that Florida and Michigan be counted from the very beginning, when the decision was made to strip the two states of their votes?

Gee, nothing like taking advantage of the fact that no candidates were allowed to campaign in Florida, and then trying to make a "vote grab".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #6
21. She did the same in Michigan. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #6
47. WHY did Obama wait several days before he said Clinton's comments were NOT racial?
instead he let the stew get toxic.

(regarding mlk and clinton). why? why?

its politics, simple as that. in both cases
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #47
50. Apples and oranges
And no, this isn't just simply "politics". This is about taking advantage of the fact that none of the candidates have been actively campaigning in Florida, and then waiting until just days before the primary to demand that Florida's votes count. Hillary knows damned well that she has a huge advantage in Florida, with just her name recognition alone. People in Florida haven't had a chance to get to see Obama and Edwards up close.

This is the issue at hand - nice attempt to bring in some totally unrelated topic, but it's not going to work. Address the issue at hand, please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #50
52. Yes, indeed, as Obama's was more serious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #50
97. Obama Runs Ads In Florida
No other candidate has run ads at all. Sorry you missed seeing them on CNN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #47
57. Why is it Obama's job to defend his political foe's words?? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #57
84. He calls himself a leader, then he should act like one. He 'acted' days late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
7. So tell your state party to stop violating the rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
8. Self delete. Saw the answer from the next poster.
Edited on Sun Jan-27-08 11:33 AM by mtnsnake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #8
40. self delete.
Edited on Sun Jan-27-08 11:33 AM by mtnsnake
Saw the answer from the next poster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thesubstanceofdreams Donating Member (625 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
9. Stop blaming Obama

It was the DNC decision not to seat Florida's delegates. In turn, this was in response to the Florida Dem Party not respecting the rules set by the DNC.

Whether fair or not, it doesn't make any sense at all to change the rules in the middle of the race when the wind blows in your direction, as Hillary is attempting.

Between respecting the rules and bending them for electoral gain, I know what I prefer.
And it is not Obama's fault that Florida's Dem voters are disenfranchised. Not by a long mile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #9
35. Good post, you got it exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
10. Blame your party.
HRC wouldn't give a second thought to FL, unless she felt she needed it. Look at what she did in SC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
11. So is it worth voting in the primaries in FL or not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
120. if it's come to asking that question, then it really doesn't matter -- there's no democratic process
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
139. Its always worth it, Gray.
Even if its just to make a statement.

Unless you're at death's door or something....

My polling place is 2 blocks away, and our
"useless" primary in Michigan keyed the Clinton
camp into the fact that 73% of African Americans
were NOT voting for her.

Despite THAT info, someone advising her decided it would be a
good idea play up the race issue in South Carolina.

:crazy:

Voting is ALWAYS a good idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnywishbone97 Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
14. without Florida the democrats are going to lose in November
We either get our way and be seated or John McCain becomes the next President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snotcicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #14
42. Why is that? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #14
74. I doubt that n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
15. Since the candidates haven't campaigned there, Hillary benefits from name recognition
and she is going to fund raisers there.

Making an exception for your state is support of chaos.

Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnywishbone97 Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #15
23. watch it happen.
We will be seated and the DNC cant do anything about it. Without Florida the Dems are losers again and they wont risk that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. If they're seated AFTER the nominee is chosen, then it might happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. The DNC can do plenty about it
They can refuse to allow the Michigan and Florida delegates be seated, and their votes won't count.

I'm convinced that even if this continues, that we can still carry Florida in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. It's up to the convention now, I think
The DNC has ruled. There will be a Credentials challenge and the seated delegates in total will vote on allowing any delegation from MI and FL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #29
33. Do I understand properly? The already seated delegates will vote on allowing MI & FL?
Is it possible for that vote to come AFTER the nominee is chosen and the opponents conceeded?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #33
77. It will happen at the beginning of the convention
I imagine there'll be tons of discussion between now and then. There may even be a decision by the Rules and Bylaws Committee. But any credentials challenge is decided by the convention delegates.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #33
78. No the Credentials Committee will meet before the convention
and rule on any challenges. That can be appealed to the convention itself. But this all takes place before the nominee is chosen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #33
83. In past conventions disputes over delegations have been decided earlier
Disputes over delegations are first supposed to be decided by the Credentials Committee, which presents its report to the convention as a whole. Any appeal beyond that goes to the convention floor and is settled by the votes of the already-credentialed delegations. You can expect this to happen on the first day of the convention, since the seating of delegates needs to be settled before the convention begins the rest of its work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnywishbone97 Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #26
37. you wish you could carry Florida.
we didnt carry it in 2004 and it was stolen in 2000. At least the repukes didnt ban Florida from their convention which was a hell of a lot smarter than what the morons at the DNC decided. Either they get seated or we lose Florida AGAIN and that will be the election
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #15
85. Obama benefits from his running the cable ads
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nancyharris Donating Member (637 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
18. The idea that the Florida primary
should count toward seated delegates, but that all of the candidates should be prohibited from campaigning there is the most anti-democratic proposal I have ever heard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ursi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
19. If Florida cheated against rules then they shouldn't be ...Hillary is desperate
to get her and Bill back in the White House and their hands on power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #19
39. The 'desperate card" is real BORING. Is that all you got?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #39
44. Remember Hillary said that "Florida doesn't count" just a few short months ago
Before she got desperate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #44
48. LINKY?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #48
54. I don't respond to threads subjected in baby talk
Sorry, grow up a bit, and maybe we can talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #54
60. So, you have no proof. Figures
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:16 AM
Original message
DNC did the right thing
Let Florida get away with that and the first primaries for 2012 would be held in mid-2011.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
27. so 0 supporters agree- in this "democracy" not everyone's vote should be counted.
women fought for the vote, blacks fought for the vote

and the black candidate's supporters want to deny the vote to 2 states instead of

standing up for the disenfranchised voters.

There's something wrong with this picture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. What is wrong with playing by the fucking rules?
And you still haven't addressed why Hillary has waited until now to demand that FL and Michigan votes be counted. Why didn't she make her case from the very beginning? Why not try to get the decision reversed, and allow time for candidates to do some real campaigning in Florida?

It's not because that Hillary assumes she's going to win Florida, and is making a "vote grab", is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #27
58. Its not very "democratic" to count votes when only one person is on the ballot
or when no campaigning has been allowed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnywishbone97 Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #58
90. Obama and Edwards
and ALL THE REST of the candidates are on my FLORIDA ballot. but none of them will win except Hilary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ISUGRADIA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
28. I'm glad Hillary has been pushing for this since the beginning
oh, wait, it was just this weekend. Anything to win a fucking vote, no principles at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #28
49. A little green? She out-woman-uvered Obama on this one. Good move on her part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ISUGRADIA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #49
73. No, just see through a political stunt
Clinton cannot be trusted, will say one thing to one set of voters (IA and NH) and then turn around and say the opposite to another group (MI and FL). Anything to become president. At lease she cannot execute a retarded man like her husband did when he was running.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #73
89. and Obama will do anything to win.
Edited on Sun Jan-27-08 12:48 PM by rodeodance
edit for spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RL3AO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
31. Rules are there for a reason.
If they didn't have them, everyone would have primaries the week after midterms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
34. Edwards said that he does not want the voters disenfranchised.
Obama does not want them, because he is losing in Florida. Duh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
36. HO HO, so OBAMA is into disenfranchising voters via the delegates. He stepped
into some deep poo now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnywishbone97 Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #36
38. if Obama carries this position that Florida not get seated
Ill vote for a republican for the first time EVER. There are alot of Floridians who feel the same way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #38
46. I think so also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #38
59. Does anyone seriously think that Florida isn't a critical swing State
or that barring the door at the Democratic Convention and sending home all of the Florida delegates who will travel to that Convention this summer won't make a lot of very important Democratic activists bitter and less likely to work their ass off for our nominee, at least for a few crucial weeks?

The effective way to punish Florida for breaking the rules without shooting the Democratic nominee for President in the foot was the "No Campaign Pledge" that Democratic candidates signed with the 4 Early State Chairs regarding their activities with Florida. Hillary has fully honored that pledge, no ifs, ands, or buts; unlike Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last_texas_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #38
133. I don't understand this logic
My state's Democratic primary is traditionally too late to matter in terms of picking the nominee. Should I threaten to vote Republican because of this? If FL's delegates don't end up counting they will simply make the same difference in terms of the final outcome as the delegates of all of the states voting too late for their votes to matter towards picking the final nominee. And even threatening to vote for one of those Repug jerkoffs is just lame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
41. Obama will do anything to win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #41
72. Wow...Obama made the
Florida State Democratic Party break the rules?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #72
86. See how silly tht comment is?-- Obama folks toss it out as their response so so so
often. Thought I would give it try.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #86
92. I don't understand...
What does "Obama" have to do with the Florida Democratic Party breaking the rules? What response are you looking for. What's the goal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pdxmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
45. Edwards said last night on CNN that he wasn't getting into that discussion
either. That those decisions were up to someone else. So essentially, he is taking the same position as Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bad Thoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
62. Then work for a later primary that fits the Party's Parameters eom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Medusa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
63. So it's fine if the Clintons cheat huh?
Let's review the facts. The other candidates did not campaign in those two states. Hillary won simply because she got voters to turn out, knowing full well that they intended to try and get these states reseated and she could suddenly be the recipient of their delegate votes. Now that's cheating, plain, pure, and simple. No, those two states should never have had their votes taken away to begin with but dammit, you don't petition to get them back once you've won them. I bet if she had lost them she'd be singing a different tune.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #63
103. Sen. Clinton asked for the rules to be reconsidered. NO cheating as you state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
64. You can't break the rules, and then switch back before the nomination.
Everyone who was told by the DNC to stop competing would be totally shafted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FunkyLeprechaun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
66. Good for Obama
If he and Edwards didn't have a chance to campaign in Florida and Michigan then it's totally unfair to them if Hillary demands those delegates to be seated. it is totally undemocratic of Hillary to do that... she knows that the presidency is slipping from her grasp and... yes... she is getting desperate. It is blatantly obvious and not good for Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
67. Even the state chairwoman said today that the DNC did what they had to do
....the rules committee did what it had to do to keep other states from leapfrogging and disrupting the process.

She knows it was a necessary decision.

Good for Obama. Glad we voted for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guruoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #67
125. I agree with your analysis, but then again I can't fault Hillary
for going after the votes.

BTW: Kudos to you for your effort in getting the truth out there reg. this issue.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
68. Nice.
Why should anyone choose to abide by the rules? Especially Florida. The state reps run all over the little people. And the little people praise more rule-breakers. Got to love it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihelpu2see Donating Member (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
69. did you stand up against the Fl. primary being moved.... Rules are Rules nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #69
88. Rules can be changed, esp. if people are hurt/disenfranchised by them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #88
108. The rules are there for a reason
If the DNC allowed Florida and Michigan to keep their delegates, then that could have set off a domino effect as other states moved their primaries up even earlier. They made a decision, they warned these two states not to move their primaries up. This system has been in place for quite some time, and Michigan and Florida wanted to rock the boat and steal the spotlight for themselves.

You don't change the rules on such short notice. You especially don't do it AFTER the fact, such as with Michigan! How in the hell can it be fair when all other major candidates took their name off the Michigan ballot?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #108
112. Forty eight states and the territories are all abiding by the Rules
It isn't fair to them to not penalize the offending states.

My choice would have been to disallow those two states' super delegates and not penalize the average person who wants to run for National Delegate but nobody asked me my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #88
123. it's really sad that so-called DU'ers have so little regard for the "democratic process"
with the gerry-rigging of the Florida and Michigan primaries, the whole process is thrown into question -- and DU just doesn't "get" it. not one single rank-and-file voter had a say in the date-moving, and at the end of the day, it's not Florida voters or Michigan voters who lose. it's everyone b/c the whole process has been compromised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #123
129. Thank you. The rank-and-file told the party higherups in MI not to.
We were obviously ignored, and then we got punished for it. Yeah, that's fair. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GalleryGod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
71. Take your argument up with the State Democratic Party of Florida.
Edited on Sun Jan-27-08 12:14 PM by GalleryGod
Chairman Howard Dean warned them; they blew him off..a classic throwdown between "child & parent".

You've made your choice of candidate abundantly clear, on prior occasions, Counselor.

Thus... your plaintive cry for represenation rings hollow.



Will you also attempt to somehow diminish with outrage Senator Kennedy's endorsement of Obama,when it arrives within the next 8 days?

I say you will. But...that's IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
75. I feel your pain, but you are barking up the wrong tree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
79. Obama is standing by the DNC's decision
It was the DNC that decided that Florida votes would not count. This happened months ago. It's not like the DNC has been deciding whether or not to punish Florida, and Obama suggested withholding their votes. He's standing by the DNC's decision. As such, he has not done any active campaigning in Florida.

Is that too difficult to understand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
80.  obama memo........their primary votes will be worthless
Obama stirs fight with Florida memo
The Clinton campaign criticizes her rival's insistence that the state's votes won't count.
By ADAM C. SMITH, Times Political Editor
Published January 16, 2008





Barack Obama doesn't care what Florida Democrats say on Jan. 29.

In a memo released Tuesday, he reiterated his long-standing view that their primary votes will be worthless. And he vaguely charged that Hillary Rodham Clinton may violate her pledge not to campaign in Florida by holding events here later this month.

"We signed a pledge not to campaign in Florida before Feb. 5, and we're not going to campaign in Florida," Clinton spokesman Mo Elleithee said. "But it is disappointing that the Obama campaign continues to tell people that their voices don't count, that they continue to disenfranchise people. Hillary Clinton wants to be president of all 50 states."


http://www.sptimes.com/2008/01/16/State/Obama_stirs_fight_wit.shtml




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #80
100. Obama was just reiterating what the DNC had already decided
Once again - it wasn't Obama who decided Michigan and Florida's fate. The states decided that when they blatantly ignored warnings from the DNC, and moved their primaries up in attempt to steal the spotlight from other, smaller states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #100
115. ONCE again. Sen Clinton is asking the DNC to Re-consider their ruling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
81. This is a fight between the state and national Democratic parties.
This is not a Clinton vs. Obama situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnywishbone97 Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #81
87. because Obama clearly loses here
Seems alot like Mississippi back in the early 60s. Obama doesnt have a prayer in Florida now or in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #87
91. He sure did lose with his decison of NOT standing up for the people
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #91
99. Hillary's stance sure is genuine, isn't it?
I mean, Hillary cares so much for the people of Florida, that she waits mere days before the primary to demand that Florida's delegates get to cast their votes.

This wouldn't have anything to do with the fact that she just got her clock cleaned in SC, would it? She's looking for an easy win in Florida, and you know it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #99
102. I was speaking of Obama--and I think his decision today will not look good to
many in FL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #102
104. Again, what "decision" would that be?
When did Obama decide that Florida's votes should not count? Because I wasn't aware that he had that power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #104
109. Hill is asking for a reconsideration of the ruling. I did NOT say anything about
about Obama.............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #109
111. You said "his decision today will not look good to many in FL"
So I'm asking again - what decision of Obama's are you talking about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #111
118. It's not his decision. Again this is between the state and national parties.
Even if Obama recommended the motion, it's up to the DNC. And they will probably disagree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostInAnomie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
95. Why should people be rewarded for knowingly breaking the rules?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #95
106. There is no breaking of rules. Sen. Clinton has asked for a reconsideration at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #106
110. I guess, technically, the rules won't be broken until Tuesday
But Florida's primary does break the rules.

I would love to have had my state go early. But we're sticking to the DNC Rules and waiting until Feb 10. We may or may not count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #110
114. There are too many claims of 'breaking the rules" i do not know what will
happen come tueday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #95
130. Please read up on this: the rank-and-file had no say.
The people were disenfranchised by state and national party leaders playing chicken. The people didn't want to break the rules. The people begging the party chair in MI not to do this, and we're the ones who got screwed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
105. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Richardson08 Donating Member (472 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
107. Obama wants the remaining primaries held in South Carolina
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turn CO Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
113. Explain it to me.
If Hillary Clinton was the only name on the ballot, how did the voters who wanted to vote for Edwards or Obama or Richardson or whomever get their voices heard? How are those VOTERS being fairly represented?

WHY aren't you concerned that those voters who PREFERRED Edwards or Richardson or Obama HAVE BEEN DISENFRANCHISED if the Clinton votes are "counted"?

If ALL the names had been on the ballot, then it would be fair enough to count them. But all the names WERE NOT on the ballot, and the rules cannot be changed weeks AFTER the game has been played.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnywishbone97 Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #113
119. all democrats are on the ballot in Florida
its just clear that Obama will lose by a large margin even though he is advertising here which is against the rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turn CO Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #119
127. I guess I've gotten it confused with Michigan...
I still think it's a little late to change the rules. I am sure this was a really tough decision for the DNC committee to make, and I respect the leadership that Howard Dean has brought to the DNC.

I am in a state out west - so most of us here are NOT fond of the idea of all this front-loading. It makes the early states more important. Florida and Michigan are not my favorite states right now for trying to jump ahead, but that doesn't mean that I agree that Iowa and NH should maintain their "first" status. It's all bullshit to me. And I think caucuses are an old-fashioned joke.

I wish that the DNC would decide to have a national primary day late in the season, say in May, using a preferred candidate ranking system - then hold a couple of national run-off elections later. So much fairer for the rest of the states' voters!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnywishbone97 Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #127
132. I have a Florida Dem ballot right in front of me
and it has every candidate on the ballot. Obama will not get my vote and since Edwards doesnt want to TALK about it neither will he. That leaves one person left and Ill be more than happy to see another Clinton in the White House for 8 more years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guruoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
117. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
122. That was the DNC decision and his name was not on the MI ballot
How undemocratic would it be to seat delegates when a party decision resulted in his name being off the ballot?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStateGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
128. O? Oprah? That reminds me of the Repubs and their W stickers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
131. Wow...there's all sorts of problems brewing...
which, coupled with the catfight among the top candidates, spells "brokered convention."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #131
140. Cool. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
141. 0bama needs to stop kissing rethug tail for once and examine why we are called the DEMOCRATIC party
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
142. The Clintons can't be trusted to keep their word or pledges
The Nevada caucus format was fine to the Clintons until it became inconvenient.

The Clintons agreed with DNC stripping Florida and Michigan of their delegates for moving their primary, until it became inconvenient.

Obama stood by his pledge to abide by DNC's ruling.

Can't trust the Clintons about nothing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #142
146. Agreed
I'm with Obama and Edwards on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
143. disgusting isn't it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
145. Hillary earned my support with this. I hope the delegates will be seated
people's votes should NEVER be messed up with - by ANYONE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC