|
The site is listed to one James R. Whitson.
The electoral map is, like all Beltway type analyses generally made by elderly white men, too certain about what Hispanic-American voters are and are not going to do and in what numbers.
Pollingwise, Iowa and Wisconsin seem to always have nearly identical results to each other. I don't know what rational basis there is for splitting one from the other in the prediction.
I think a lot of the prediction has as basic assumption that the Rove plan of turning out 3-4 million additional Christian Right voters will work, that there won't be a sufficiently effective Democratic response, and that it will carry most or all swing states necessary (and then some) for Bush. Those are three assumptions I'd strongly hesistate to buy into. (For one thing, the 3-4 million Christian Right votes that Rove is missing in his tallies could well represent many older churchgoing voters who died between 1994 and 2002 and are replaced in CR and Republican tallies by mostly more middle aged, politically scarred and relentlessly passive, voters.)
So: the site buys into Republican best-case scenarios, which are well known and publicized and internally strongly argued to be a guarantee of success in the crucial places. The Republican efforts to fully register, organize, motivate, and turn out their voters has been running for several months. It hasn't helped stem recent polls putting Kerry up by on average 50 to 44, though, so you have to wonder about its real efficacy in getting them what they want. They're running out of elderly undereducated white people.
The Democratic counterpart plan ('Plan 51/04') is by far not as well publicized, more focussed, and set to hit the ground in swing states this month. I'd say a half to one million new registations in these targetted states is what we're looking for; population growth in the Blue States will bring in the other three million we're likely to get.
|