Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why did the big money move to Democratic nominees and away from the Republicans?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
awaysidetraveler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 05:34 PM
Original message
Why did the big money move to Democratic nominees and away from the Republicans?
Edited on Sat Jan-26-08 05:42 PM by awaysidetraveler
Last night, after taking some time to analyze the money in opensecrets.org, two major pieces of information began glaring out of the finances of the Democratic Presidential Primaries. The first is that the big money moved from the Republican Party to the Democratic Party about two years ago. The second is that the largest financiers of this election are all of the same guys that run Wall Street.

It dawned upon me then, that this election is about oil. It is not about the Iraq war, not about health care, not about poverty, not about the environment and not about the candidates–Hillary’s experience, Edward’s populism and Obama’s message of hope and change. It is about the conflict between oil money and Wall Street’s money.

Republicans love to talk about how taxes slow down the economy, and how capitalism thrives in low-tax situations. When one considers it, their economic theory makes sense to a point. What republicans don’t like to mention is that oil prices have the exact same effect on our economy as regressive taxes: high oil prices slow down our economy much like the "head taxes" of Adam Smith’s time once did.

So why is most of the big money going to the democratic candidates this year? I've got a hunch: Wall Street now understands that the future of our economy is riding on our ability to create cheap energy sources. Who knows? Maybe they’ve even figured out that global warming is no joke. So that’s why we’re seeing Obama’s getting big money from major investment firms. Meanwhile, the oil guys are still betting on McCain, and placing hedge bets on Hillary Clinton. The defense contractors and the Zionist money is behind Hillary Clinton, because they think she’ll stay the longest in Iraq, which she’s stated that she will.

Individual contributions are now also being injected into the race. Candidates like Obama and Edwards get a majority of their money from individuals, which should mean that we get more than a little say in their policies. Only are our motives any different for wanting change? No! Most democrats have long known what even some republicans like Huckabee or Ron Paul are figuring out: our oil dependence must change now, because we don’t want Iraq, and we don’t want Saudi Arabia, and we don’t want Iran, and we don’t even want Afghanistan.

We want out of the oil game, and we want out of the Iraq War. Right?

So I'll pose the question again: Is this Democratic Primary a referendum on oil abuse and the Iraq war?

And if not, then why is the big money moving to the Democratic Party?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nope
any other country in the world, and that would be accurate.

All the money moved to the dems so that the big money owns the winner. The chance of a Repub winning this time around without another 9/11 is laughable if diebold were not still involved.

This is all Kabuki. All of this fighting, and what will change on 1/21/2009? My guess is, very little.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awaysidetraveler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I'm not so sure, most of the money is coming from individuals now--not big money.
I'm not sure what all they own, anyway, other than an audience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. $300 million + is coming from individuals????
Edited on Sat Jan-26-08 05:55 PM by Hydra
We're in the middle of an economic crisis. I find it highly unlikely that 1/4 of that is coming from normal donors. I've heard one practice of getting around maximum donations is to give money as "bonuses" to people within the donating company with orders to donate to specific candidate.

Like the economy, look at the hard numbers, and tell me why you are so optimistic. I see our top-tiers as being bought off- after all, without their help, you don't get to be President in America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awaysidetraveler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. 300$ million is only one dollar a person in America, and I'm only talking about Obama and Edwards
When I say that the majority of their money is coming from individuals. Obama's at more like 70 million, right now,
and journalists who interview him can't seem to get over it.

Check opensecrets.org for details.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. You're counting underage and non-workers in that number
I don't have enough to donate, and I've seen some of the numbers in the 10's of millions per company.

I've read various theses regarding a fight between oil vs wall street, and the indicators don't support that POV. There is a large group of people MASSIVELY profiting from Bushco policies, and they are trying to get the most likely candidates to win on a leash. That was the policy, and I don't see them changing it until it stops working.

When was the last time the corps got majorly spanked for bad behavior?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. I don't know about that, I had previously only given $100, this time I gave $500 overtime
And we're hardly rolling in dough.

I'm thinking a lot of people have stepped up contributions, seeing that Bush was destroying our country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. No money here
And the number of people cramming into housing in my area (8-14 per condo in some cases) tells me that I'm not the only one feeling a squeeze.

Hell, I can't even cough up $15 for DU, and considering how helpful it is...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whosinpower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Agreed.nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awaysidetraveler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Okay, who's in power. What's your take on the money shift?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. because money wants to continue its hold on power
this is their deposit on their future ownership of the Presidency
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awaysidetraveler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I don't think it's that simple. They're fighting one another for control of the presidency, I think
I think it's a battle between oil and money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Yes, the Republicans' constant warmongering
keeps the oil price high which benefits Bush-Cheney's buddies but drags the economy down (as you mentioned earlier).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awaysidetraveler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Wow, it's such a relief to hear someone else acknowledge that.
Thanks, it's hard to find people who look through to the money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. Chinese workers save their money
and their govt lends it to American banks who in turn lend it to American consumers to spend, spend, spend. This is a big part of how the global economy works (from my limited understanding).

As long as American consumers are borrowing and spending more and more then everyone's happy. But Bush-Cheney have systematically depleted the middle-class - the goose that lays the golden egg of continued growth. It's time for the Democrats to build up middle-class spending power again.

After 8 years of prosperity the Republicans can come back in and siphon the surplus off to their MIC buddies again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. Because the Democrats are funnier?
:shrug:

More likely because Bush-Cheney have pumped the treasury into the MIC leaving the rest of the economy to tank.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awaysidetraveler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. MIC? I haven't heard that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Military-Industrial Complex.
Halliburton and Blackwater are the tip of that iceberg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awaysidetraveler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. Don't forget to include General Electric, and the other regional oil interests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
14. GOP depleted, they're buying Dem candidates instead
The agenda will be the same. Corporations know that GOP is too unpopular, so they went to the DLC and said "we'll give you all the money we would have given to the GOP candidate, but you have to get candidates for us who will do what we say."

Hence, Hillary and Obama.

Note: They're also buying Dem congresscritters, too. They started that program in 2006, that's why our Dem-led Congress is acting like a GOP one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awaysidetraveler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. I agree with your support of Edwards, but wouldn't put Obama in the Hillary category.
Obama is taking money from Wall Street, but he's not taking it from defense contractors. Also, most of his money comes
from individuals and not Wall Street. Check opensecrets.org for details.

The Rezko trial actually looks like an Obama setup to me. The "victim" in that fraud trial is General Electric, which owns billions in oil and NBC, and MSNBC. They've got billions to lose if Obama begins his "Green Revolution."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. Finally someone get it.
Edited on Sat Jan-26-08 07:01 PM by RC
This is exactly what is going on.

Obama is the backup for Hillary. He also fulfills the need to make the Dem primary look like some kind of contest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lisainmilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
19. GWB! N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC