Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Video: Former President of Chicago NOW calls Hillary a liar, personally witnessed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DesEtoiles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 02:14 AM
Original message
Video: Former President of Chicago NOW calls Hillary a liar, personally witnessed
Hillary's campaign workers spreading false information on Obama

Switches from supporting HIllary to supporting Obama

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/1/23/213221/309/346/442059
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 02:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. People are paying attention and who's lying
and who's for real...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 02:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. That's why Obama's tubing.
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #2
16. english translation, please?
what did you just say?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Tubing, tanking, flopping - whatever you want to call it.
And I don't need any snark about my English from someone who can't even spell antifascist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zueda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #17
22. Do you mean tubbing?
Edited on Thu Jan-24-08 09:01 AM by Zueda
When I go tubing it usually involves a river, a couple of intertubes and a cooler full of beer.

on edit. oh and it looks like Clinton is tubbing. Carville was on Today this morning trying to undo what he was probably responsible for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #17
25. actually, if you wish to communicate,
you might try our language.

Tubing -
1. a hollow, usually cylindrical body of metal, glass, rubber, or other material for conveying or containing liquids or gases.
2. a small, collapsible, cylinder of metal or plastic sealed at one end and having a capped opening at the other from which paint, toothpaste, or some other semifluid substance may be squeezed.
3. Anatomy, Zoology. any hollow, cylindrical vessel or organ: the bronchial tubes.
4. Botany.
a. any hollow, elongated body or part.
b. the united lower portion of a gamopetalous corolla or a gamosepalous calyx.
5. inner tube.
6. Electronics. electron tube.
7. Informal.
a. television.
b. a television set.
8. mailing tube.
9. the tubular tunnel in which an underground railroad runs.
10. the railroad itself.
11. Surfing Slang. the curled hollow formed on the underside of a cresting wave.
12. British. subway (def. 1).
13. Australian Slang. a can of beer.
14. Older Slang. a telescope.
–verb (used with object)
15. to furnish with a tube or tubes.
16. to convey or enclose in a tube.
17. to form into the shape of a tube; make tubular.


I don't mind creativity when appropriate, (as here, when my choice of name was previously taken, so I took liberties with an expression of where I stand politically) nor do I mind word games and humor, sarcasm, or oblique references.

Your entry contained none of those. Nor did it use the word in a way that is defined by common usage.

If you want to be an ass and complain when people understandably ask for a translation, by all means, continue in that fashion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #25
32. Going down the tubes:
From TheFreeDictionary:

tube (tb, tyb)
n.
1.
a. A hollow cylinder, especially one that conveys a fluid or functions as a passage.
b. An organic structure having the shape or function of a tube; a duct: a bronchial tube.
2. A small flexible cylindrical container sealed at one end and having a screw cap at the other, for pigments, toothpaste, or other pastelike substances.
3. Music The cylindrical part of a wind instrument.
4. Electronics
a. An electron tube.
b. A vacuum tube.
5. Botany The lower, cylindrical part of a gamopetalous corolla or a gamosepalous calyx.
6. Chiefly British
a. An underground railroad tunnel.
b. An underground railroad system, especially the one in London, England.
7. A tunnel.
8.
a. An inner tube.
b. An inflatable tube or cushion made of rubber or plastic and used for recreational riding, as behind a motor boat or down a snow-covered slope.
9. Informal
a. Television: What's on the tube?
b. A television set.
10. tubes Informal The fallopian tubes.
v. tubed, tub·ing, tubes
v.tr.
1. To provide with a tube; insert a tube in.
2. To place in or enclose in a tube.
v.intr.
To ride or float on an inflated tube for recreation.
Idiom:
down the tubes/tube Slang
Into a state of failure or ruin: saw her plans go down the tubes.


Google

tubing "down the tubes" flop

for about 7000 examples.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
29. to use your phrase
that post ain't nuthin but shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jasmine621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
21. And Hillary was correct in saying that Obama was "weak" on choice.
He may have received 100% from NOW but that may have been to get him elected. Voting "present" is a sign of "weakness" to me.

HC is also correct revealing that Obama's voting record demonstrates a lack of willingness to take responsibility for tough decisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. Who is lying then?
http://www.illinoisnow.org/

Obama Was Present, But He Was Not There On Issues That Mattered to Illinois Women
In celebration of Women’s History Month, March 28, 2007, the National Organization for Women Political Action Committee, NOW PAC, announced its endorsement of Hillary Clinton for President (see article below).

Illinois NOW PAC supported the endorsement of Senator Clinton. “She is, after all, our native sister,” said Bonnie Grabenhofer, president of Illinois NOW. “We know from her record and in her heart she will be there for us.”

Senator Clinton has a long history of support for women's empowerment, and her public record is a testimony to her leadership on issues important to women in the U.S. and around the globe. She has eloquently articulated the need for full economic, political and social equality for women in every institution of society, taking action throughout her career — as a lawyer, community leader, First Lady, Senator and candidate for the presidency — to advance the civil and human rights of women and girls.

After looking at his record, Grabenhofer does not feel the same way about Illinois Senator Barack Obama.

During Senator Obama’s 2004 senate campaign, the Illinois NOW PAC did not recommend the endorsement of Obama for U.S. Senate because he refused to stand up for a woman’s right to choose and repeatedly voted ‘present’ on important legislation.

As a State Senator, Barack Obama voted ‘present’ on seven abortion bills, including a ban on 'partial birth abortion,' two parental notification laws and three 'born alive' bills. In each case, the right vote was clear, but Senator Obama chose political cover over standing and fighting for his convictions.

“When we needed someone to take a stand, Senator Obama took a pass,” said Grabenhofer. “He wasn’t there for us then and we don’t expect him to be now.”

For more information on the endorsement go to www.nowpac.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 02:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. LOL. You beat me to it...but just barely.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 02:23 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. no worries :)
GMTA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neutron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 02:51 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. They've got that video up at Daily Kos
followed by a barrage of the usual smears from Obamites.
I think Daily Kos should be taken down. It has no credibility. All the diaries are either John Edwards ads or HRC smears. It has gone into the toilet. How do they get a convention and what kind of idiots does it attract.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 02:54 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Meh
If Obama wants to fight "who is better on pro-choice" with Hillary as he goes into SC let him.

He's gonna find a lot of the church goers he's been fighting to get, decide to stay at home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Why do you bother going there?
Daily Kos to me represents the left wing fringe of the party. I can't even bother to check the garbage they spew on a daily basis. Why get aggravated? Simply ignore them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #14
26. Daily Kos is the left-wing fringe??????
LOL! In 2004 they chose the "centrist" Kerry over Dean. Left wing? No, I assure you Kos is trying REAL hard to nuzzle up to the big boys in order to be included in the web version of mainstream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 02:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. Lets look and see what NOW says:
http://www.illinoisnow.org/

In celebration of Women’s History Month, March 28, 2007, the National Organization for Women Political Action Committee, NOW PAC, announced its endorsement of Hillary Clinton for President (see article below).

Illinois NOW PAC supported the endorsement of Senator Clinton. “She is, after all, our native sister,” said Bonnie Grabenhofer, president of Illinois NOW. “We know from her record and in her heart she will be there for us.”

Senator Clinton has a long history of support for women's empowerment, and her public record is a testimony to her leadership on issues important to women in the U.S. and around the globe. She has eloquently articulated the need for full economic, political and social equality for women in every institution of society, taking action throughout her career — as a lawyer, community leader, First Lady, Senator and candidate for the presidency — to advance the civil and human rights of women and girls.

After looking at his record, Grabenhofer does not feel the same way about Illinois Senator Barack Obama.

During Senator Obama’s 2004 senate campaign, the Illinois NOW PAC did not recommend the endorsement of Obama for U.S. Senate because he refused to stand up for a woman’s right to choose and repeatedly voted ‘present’ on important legislation.

As a State Senator, Barack Obama voted ‘present’ on seven abortion bills, including a ban on 'partial birth abortion,' two parental notification laws and three 'born alive' bills. In each case, the right vote was clear, but Senator Obama chose political cover over standing and fighting for his convictions.

“When we needed someone to take a stand, Senator Obama took a pass,” said Grabenhofer. “He wasn’t there for us then and we don’t expect him to be now.”

For more information on the endorsement go to www.nowpac.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 02:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Ewwww. Obama playing it safe again with "present" votes.
That is not a good thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 02:24 AM
Response to Original message
7. I am not getting any sound when I play that video. Any one else this same problem?
I adjusted the dial on the video, the one on my computer, and the one on my speaker and still no sound.


:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThatPoetGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 02:30 AM
Response to Original message
9. Did you actually watch the video?
There's no proof that this woman was EVER a Hillary supporter. She gave thousands of dollars to many Democrats, but I can't find a single donation to Hillary.

If she had met with Obama so often and worked with him so closely, as she claims, why was she a Hillary supporter in the first place? It doesn't really add up, does it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 02:45 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Not only that
But she's a "former President" of Chicago NOW --who just happens to disagree with the President of Illinois NOW on Obama?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 02:43 AM
Response to Original message
10. That video is absolutely brutal.
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 03:00 AM
Response to Original message
15. Wow!
The President of Chicago?

For reals?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. Is that like the Emporer of Ice Cream?
Edited on Thu Jan-24-08 08:47 AM by Jim Sagle
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Onlooker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
19. She's just like the rest of us
http://www.fashionwindows.com/room_service/2005/clinton.asp

The event was a rare opportunity to speak with some of New England’s most prominent socialites and to learn a bit more of their style choices in their world replete with social obligations. Here, European and American labels got on well together.

Lorna Brett Howard of New York hosted the fundraiser in her elegant home located adjacent to Gramercy Park, New York’s only private park.

Mrs. Howard opted for a layered dress in green created by Prada, and which falls just below the knees. The dress was set off by wide satin belt and Mrs. Howard’s sensible selection of diamond earrings and a gold bracelet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Yup- That sounds like an average weekend for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. Thanks for the link to proof that she was a Clinton supporter
Much appreciated!

Do have a question, though: How does her being a socialite invalidate her statements regarding Obama's pro-choice voting record?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Onlooker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. To a degree
She lives in an exclusive fantasy world.

I know that Obama is as pro-choice as Clinton, but I also know both sides are playing politics. For instance, Obama's pandering to Republicans as the party of ideas and his pandering to homophobic elements of the religious community is just as wrong as Clinton's distortion of his record. Right now, both Obama and Clinton's campaigns are awful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #24
28. Socialite = bad. Largest mansion in the county = good.
You can't criticize Brett Howard without criticizing Edwards for the same largess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Onlooker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #28
31. Sure I can!
Clinton, Obama, and Edwards all live in gorgeous houses. I have no idea of their market values or the reasons for them having such elaborate houses, except that they're rich, and a big house is something the rich can afford. In our political system we are stuck with the power of wealth. (Even Obama is a millionaire.) But, none of our candidates are exclusives. They are all working hard to reach out to everyone. Socialites are exclusive; they exclude people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
27. Of course they are lying.
I live here and can confirm it. The Clintons are lying hacks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. Yup.
A truly shameful lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC