|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Perky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-22-08 01:20 PM Original message |
Hillary voted for a 30 percent cap on credit card interest. Why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-22-08 01:21 PM Response to Original message |
1. Because she hates kittens. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kokonoe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-22-08 01:21 PM Response to Original message |
2. 29.99% interest was too low. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-22-08 01:23 PM Response to Original message |
3. Hillary wanted to cap credit card interest because Obama didn't? -the Sear's card was 35%post Reagan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-22-08 01:25 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Obama voted against it because 30% is usury. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNDemNY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-22-08 01:27 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Right...no limit is better. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DesertFlower (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-22-08 01:34 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. banks and credit card companies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suston96 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-22-08 01:28 PM Response to Original message |
6. Because no cap at all would have been disastrous for borrowers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-22-08 01:36 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. I do not know----but your response is probably in the ballpark |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marie26 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-22-08 01:38 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. There wasn't one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marie26 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-22-08 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
9. Because it's pro-consumer? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:35 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC