Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

When does Edwards drop out?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ringmastery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 10:55 AM
Original message
When does Edwards drop out?
Would he continue on to Texas and Florida even if he gets wiped out tomorrow and loses all the Super Tuesday states?

What would be the point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tank in Texas Donating Member (182 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. Don't Get Your Hopes Up
First of all that is not going to happen, especially in Ohio, Minnesota and Georgia. Look at the latest polls and then look at Edwards' performance with:

1- voters changing their mind in the three days prior to a contest.

2- Independent and Republican cross-over voters.

You might not see Edwards win NY or CA but you will see him win 1-2 states. Also, Kerry will not achieve a BIG win in any of the states that matter.

This isn't a coronation folks, despite the fact that certain parties seem to have wanted it to be one.

Edwards should not drop out of the race until he runs out of money (not likely anytime soon) or is mathematically eliminated. I am looking forwards to an interesting convention in August.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeSpeechCrusader Donating Member (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. "Kerry will not achieve a BIG win in any of the states that matter."
So...who picks which states matter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tank in Texas Donating Member (182 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. ALL of them matter... some offer more delegates.
Don't forget what Zogby calls the Edwards factor- almost every poll has been off every primary this year. Edwards ALWAYS closes strong and beats the expectations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. November 4th after he wins the Presidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
29. Resign the day he's elected?
That would be one short presidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dedalus Donating Member (136 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. The point is...
...to keep people interested in the race and keep media coverage of the issues going. There's a great article on democraticunderground.com right now about this very subject. Once the nomination is de facto won by someone (at this point, you and others would presume this person to be Kerry), all the free coverage stops. Plus, the GOP would be able to concentrate all their attacks on one person, rather than having to spread themselves thin. In short, the longer the nomination is up in the air, the better it is for the Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Welcome to DU
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surfermaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
30. You got it
free air time, it is better to battle with Edwards and to have to pay for air time to battle Bush...giving Kerry a time to have his stay, I say all four stay in as long as they can//////and that is what the party wants....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
32. Hi Dedalus!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tryanhas Donating Member (403 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. Probably after...
...Diebold makes sure that Kerry wins everywhere tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tank in Texas Donating Member (182 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Don't Let Conspiracy theories Decide This!
OR what happens in November. Vote anyway!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tryanhas Donating Member (403 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I wouldn't vote for Kerry...
...if the Bush administration or Kerry's HYPOTHETICAL administration threatened to send me to Guantanimo Bay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. There is no point. He has no opportunity here to challenge Kerry.
John Edwards has been running on his optimistic stump speech and little else. With only one primary state under his belt and some poor seconds, he has no reason to be optimistic. It's unfortunate that Wes Clark dropped out of the race and Edwards stayed in.

My biggest fear is that he's staying in to get the VP slot. I'm not convinced he would bring enough weight to the ticket - I guess I'm really nervous about November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efront Donating Member (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Poor seconds?
Like Iowa, Oklahoma and Wisconsin? What "strong seconds" did Clark get that makes you wish he stayed in, as opposed to Edwards. Did Clark have any seconds even as strong as Edwards' seconds in TN, VA or MO?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. no, but he did have some weak fourths and fifths!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeSpeechCrusader Donating Member (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Yeah...look who's talking
Edwards wins his birth state. Clark beats Edwards in a state that Edwards had been campaigning for a year. Clark finishes better overall on Feb. 3, but for some reason...the media hounds Clark to get out while casting it as a two man race between Kerry and Edwards. Yeah that makes sense... :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efront Donating Member (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. lol. Do you actually believe
the bullshit as you're typing it? Clark spent the entire week leading up to Feb 3 in Oklahoma and Edwards still came within 1200 votes of him. I don't think Edwards was in OK that week leading up to the primary. Also, you didn't answer the question. Did Clark have a second place as strong as Edwards' in MO, VA or TN (weaker seconds for Edwards than IA, OK and WI)???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tank in Texas Donating Member (182 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. bull.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeSpeechCrusader Donating Member (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. what exactly was bull?
present something to challenge
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tank in Texas Donating Member (182 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. elixer's post, if you'll follow the thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
9. Wednesday morning
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BruinAlum Donating Member (565 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
13. I have mixed feeling about Edwards dropping out.
On the one hand his staying in keeps the focus on Bush longer and the debates allow a free platform to fire away at Bush. On the other hand I read somewhere here that the DNC cannot start their ads against Bush until a nominee is settled on, so there would be an advantage to Edwards dropping out after tomorrow. That is assuming Edwards doesn't win any of tomorrow's primaries, which looks to be the case accodrding to the polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leyton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. I don't think we need the ads if we've got the debates.
Every time the Democrats debate, there's an article in the paper, and it usually makes the front page of Cnn.com or msnbc.com. It tends to generate discussion. If we air a thirty-second slot, it won't get as much coverage, and the coverage won't be as substantive. I also think that it looks slightly better for a candidate to stick it to Bush than the DNC because the DNC is purely partisan, while candidates are only mostly partisan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BruinAlum Donating Member (565 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Oh yes we do need the ads!
The Bush machine is starting theirs next week. And the debates are only running on cable - not the regular networks.

Candidates are only mostly partisan? LOL!;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
16. If he looses all 10 tommorow, he'll drop out...
If he wins 2 or 3 he can continue on to Texas/Florida/Louisiana and try to win it big there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Campain
If Edwards wins a few states he should stay the course because the "Liberal" Media will cover the horse race. Looks like Kucinich and Sharpton will stay the course. I would love to see Kucinich win the nom but know damn well he won't. Maybe he can get a bit of his platform into the plank. The "Liberal" Media would like to see the most moderate Dem win the nom so that their Empire won't be threatened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #20
28. The problem is...
The "liberal" media will only cover the horse race until it's over. In addition, Edwards is actually in the race to become the democratic nominee, unlike Sharpton and Kucinich who are in it to get a message accross. And even if Edwards were to stay in after loosing all 10 Super Tuesday states, the media would declare it over and stop covering the primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
21. Who knows.
I just hope I don't have to hear about his mill worker father again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jansu Donating Member (473 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
23. No one should drop out! It's about the delegates and taking it to the
floor of the convention!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lexingtonian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
26. Yep, on the 10th.

His campaign has already set up in those states and he does well in the Deep South- which on the 9th is for practical purposes not just Louisiana and Mississippi but northern Florida and eastern Texas. It's too good an opportunity to pass up.

There isn't any way Kerry would offer Edwards the VP job- unless he has an absurd desire to get stabbed in back often and deal with a sideshow competitor for a pile of years.

The point is that Edwards is the race to raise his profile nationally. The obvious reason would be to get all he can out of his first run at the office. Another would be some desire for a federal appointment job that is high profile- though I can't think of one that really fits his abilities all that well. He doesn't have the instincts or background for AG, and that would be the obvious. Maybe UN Ambassador or something of the kind? But he needs some job to tide him over until 2008, when North Carolina has shifted far enough to be a swing state and he can get back into high elective office with ease (Governor, Senator).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Columbia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
27. In 2012
After his second term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lurk_no_more Donating Member (582 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
31. Even if he gets wiped out tomorrow and loses all the Super Tuesday states?
That's a pretty safe bet, the son of a mill worker only goes so far.



And then there were none!
” JAFO”

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC