Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

For Clinton and Obama, the Burden of Identity: "Not black enough....not woman enough," offering hope

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 04:14 PM
Original message
For Clinton and Obama, the Burden of Identity: "Not black enough....not woman enough," offering hope
NYT: Judith Warner
January 17, 2008, 6:56 pm
For Clinton and Obama, the Burden of Identity

The “biggest fairy tale” in this year’s Democratic contest may be the hope, expressed with renewed vigor by both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton at Tuesday night’s Democratic debate, that, as the campaign moves forward, they will be viewed as “individuals” and not as representatives of their gender or race....

***

Can progressives part ways with identity politics? Is it a betrayal of their liberal principles to do so? Or is it time, as Obama has consistently suggested, for a new generation to redefine what is truly, productively, “progressive”?

And is it realistic even to hope – as both candidates appear to – that voters will make their ultimate choices based on policy, philosophy and personality differences, and not by falling back on gut-level feelings of racial or gender allegiance?

What I have always particularly found fascinating and admirable about these two particular candidates is the fact that they are both sui generis – true individuals who transcend received notions about what a black or female candidate should be. Yet Obama, with his mixed race parentage, multi-national upbringing, upwardly mobile education and generally self-created way of being in the world, has had to fight accusations, early on at least, that he wasn’t “black enough.” Clinton – wonky, cerebral, controlled, hyper-logical, has had to battle perceptions that she isn’t “real,” because, by the standards of pop culture and received opinion, she comes off as not-woman-enough.

In each case, rising above lowest common denominator ways of being and appearing has made the candidate more than a little suspect. (Is Obama pandering to white voters? Or does he really mean what he says? And who does Hillary think she is, anyway?) And yet, for all of us in this country who sometimes feel like freaks because we don’t fit the standard definitions of how People Like Us are supposed to look, think, and, above all, feel, Clinton and Obama both have offered a very particular and precious kind of hope....

http://warner.blogs.nytimes.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Konza Donating Member (237 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. The only solution is...
Hillary and Barack must have a love child.
It's the only way out of this mess.

We'll give the kid the nomination and cruise to election in November.
Before you poo poo the idea of a drooling infant with shitty diapers sweeping to electoral victory in 2008, I'd like to remind you that George W. Bush is President.
So anyone, and I do mean anyone, can be elected President.

Join the winning team: Love Baby-2008!
"Gaaa-urrp For Change gooo"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Now THAT is a post, Konza! Maybe someone will come up with an idea...
of what the little bambino would look like!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Let's say it together: Women and Black Americans do NOT need a media-appointed 'leader'. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Media appointed leader? I don't believe so.....
They are natural leaders based on simple human prejudices or, to put it kindly - human inclinations.

Not that there is anything wrong with that - because there really is nothing wrong with people supporting their own kind.

It's human nature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. Can a hermaphrodite candidate transcend gender relation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC