Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kucinich supporters: in your opinion, is he the only true liberal running?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
JohnLocke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 05:56 PM
Original message
Poll question: Kucinich supporters: in your opinion, is he the only true liberal running?
Edited on Sat Feb-28-04 05:56 PM by JohnLocke
Sharpton aside --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. The term 'liberal' has lost almost all meaning
Edited on Sat Feb-28-04 05:58 PM by jpgray
But in terms of where I am, if I'm a liberal, he's the only one running along with Sharpton. In terms of the press and their definition, there are other liberals running.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Desertrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I agree with you...
its all in the definition..

by mine its DK & Sharpton running at this point....

Peace
DR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waverley_Hills_Hiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think Kerry is liberal
Based on the Americans for Demcoratic Action lifetime voting score Kerry is pretty liberal. In fact he appears to be slightly more liberal than Kucinich (probably due to Kucinichs past pro-life voting record). Kucinchi recieved a lifetime score of 90, while Kerry recieved a 92.

On the issues, Kucinich is running on a more European-style social-democratic platform, which is more to the left of mainstream US liberalism represented by Kerry.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. How about a fair comparison: Kerry vs Kucinich since 12/12/2000
Which of the two had the balls to take on that unelected fraudulent piece of shit in the White House?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-29-04 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
25. Widget counts like ADA's voting score don't mean shit
No self-respecting liberal would have supported a war of aggression such as our invasion of Iraq.

Where was Kerry when the war began on March 20, 2003? Did he call for Bush's impeachment? Did he accuse Bush of betrayal and lying? No, Kerry did none of those things.

Is Kerry going to bring the troops home and end the occupation of Iraq? No, Kerry won't do that either. Kerry said he will keep the troops in Iraq for as long as it took to protect our oil interests in the region. Kerry may have not explicitly said "oil," but that is what he wants to do, turn Iraq into our new South Vietnam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darranar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. It depends on what you consider to be a "liberal"...
if you mean anyone to the left of the manufactured political center, then no. If you mean someone actually close to liberal ideas (human rights, worker's rights, civil rights, aid to the poor, etc) then yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnLocke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. See post #7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darranar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. In that case, yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. I REALLY dislike these binary polls!
It all depends on how "liberal" is defined.

A perfectly good case can be made that John Kerry is "liberal" -- if liberal means a good rating on certain types of legislative issues.

I don't know. I don't use the term "liberal" much anymore. Not because of the rightwing demonizing of the term, but because of the way that self-described "liberals" have cheapened its meaning by carefully staying "within the frame" of acceptable issue advocacy, without tackling the big job of calling attention to the very RADICAL changes that need to made in order for a TRUE liberal agenda to succeed.

I like the term "progressive", because to me it indicates actually moving forward and shifting paradigms. I don't see "liberalism" as being about wholesale change, I see it as being more about tweaking the existing paradigm -- an issue here, an issue there. To me, that's just not enough.

So... I went ahead and voted "yes" in your poll, even though I think the term "liberal" falls far short of what Kucinich is really about. A better worded poll would have been more meaningful, imho.

sw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnLocke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. That's why I said "in your opinion"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. In my opinion,
Edited on Sat Feb-28-04 06:38 PM by scarletwoman
Kucinich is the only PROGRESSIVE in the race. "Liberal" is virtually meaningless.

I probably should not have voted at all, because I don't consider the question, as worded, particularily valid -- in my opinion. Sorry.

sw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waverley_Hills_Hiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Progressive is more of a historical term.
...reffering to a reform movement in the early 20th century.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. And I very consciously refer back to that movement when I use the term.
That was a time when "socialists" could actually be a party and appear on a ballot without people totally freaking out.

We actually had a Socialist Party governor in my state of Minnesota at one time. The genesis of the present-day Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party (DFL) came out of a coalition of socialists, progressives, rural populists and the labor movement.

21st century progressives are not exactly a direct descendent of the earlier progressive movement (which included many republicans in those days, btw), but we are as much about challenging the entrenched power structure and status quo as those earlier progressives.

sw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kanary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. What scarletwoman said
I really like your definition.

When it comes right down to issues, I don't consider Dennis actually either liberal or conservative. He transcends those labels, because his priority is the PEOPLE, rather than $$$.

Totally different approach.

Kanary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. Thanks!
I totally agree with you, Dennis transcends those "liberal" and "conservative" labels. Which is exactly what I think needs to happen in order for our country to have a chance to live up to the ideals of its founding spirit.

People over profits -- is that honestly only a "liberal" value? Isn't it simply a HUMAN value?

sw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kanary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
13. Whatever the definition, he's the only one
NOT beholden to the corporations, and therefore able to really fight for the people, rather than for big company money.

Kanary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
15. When he spoke last Saturday evening
he talked about how we had to look outside conventional solutions and not let other people tell us what's impossible. "We shouldn't just push the envelope. We should find the next envelope."

When I hear the other candidates speak or debate, they seem timid, as if they're always looking for approval on what they say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youngred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
16. He is the most liberal
That's without a doubt. The only, eh the Johns are a blend of center-right pragmatism with an occasional flourish thrown in.

But I'm not going to walk into this biased setup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnLocke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. How is my question biased?
I think my setup was rather straightforward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnLocke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-29-04 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
17. He is by far the most liberal...
but he is not the only liberal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
18. Dennis and Al Sharpton are the only ones left in Dem primary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnLocke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
21. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
union_maid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
22. They're all liberals
I think the comment that Kucinich is the only progressive in the race is closer to the mark. I think of him as pretty close to a social democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThirdWheelLegend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-29-04 03:00 AM
Response to Original message
23. Dennis and Al..
TWL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ikojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-29-04 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
26. When I hear the word "liberal" I think of one
who is too mamby pamby to stand for something. A "liberal" avoids conflict and argument and just wants to please.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnLocke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-29-04 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
27. Kick (nt)
:kick: :kick: :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC