There is some concern about John Edwards regulating enforcements.

[Telly Savalas]

Other candidates may be better suited to regulate the enforcements of the U.S. Federal Government pertaining to its regulations. John Edwards may be incapable of enforcing the regulations according to its enforcements.

[aquart]

1. "Enforcements"?

Could you, like, furnish an example?

[rwheeler31]

4. Military? I'm lost

[aquart]

6. Oh, good. It's not just me.

I always worry about that.

[rwheeler31]

2. hmmm

[Muttocracy]

3. your hotwire may need a tuneup n/t

[Tuesday Afternoon]

5. Excuse me?

:wtf:

[Muttocracy]

7. "business and commerce intelligence" too - all three actually n/t

[tularetom]

8. I'm gonna go have a drink and come back and read this again

Maybe then I'll understand it.

[Muttocracy]

9. maybe get a drink in the Lounge and it may get clearer n/t

[AP]

10. you're twisting my mellon man

[Renew Deal]

13. AP, Holy Shit!!! It's you!!!

:hi:

Where have you been? I posted sometime ago that I haven't seen the biggest Edwards supporter from 2004. That's you.

[AP]

15. Hey to you!

[Kutjara]

11. Ah, a Mercer-roll. Very nice.

:hi:

[Danger Mouse]

12. John Edwards is all in my house with disease.

[saltpoint]

14. I think The Carolinian would do just fine as our chief executive.

[Muttocracy]

16. of Government #1 or Government #2? national and international? n/t

[saltpoint]

18. ...and would reverse the impression very likely left in the minds of our

allies in Europe, South America, Central America, Mexico, the Middle East, the Far East, the Near East, and nearly anyplace else there is, that, in Donald Rumsfeld's America, "international" dialogue is the euphemism from a by-gone age and that no-bid corporate profit from connected entities is the current -- and only-- commodity.

To reverse that impression by gutting that policy would be a likely outcome of an Edwards administration, fueled not least by the domestic alliance with Labor.

They are not lightly considered in his well-prepped layout and his selection of David Bonior was no accident.

Union strength in a local chapter in a remote domestic venue has everything to do, IMO, with international justice.

For just over 200 years we enjoyed the lazy summer's day of "domestic policy" stateside and "foreign policy" in far-flung corners of the world. The web extinguishes the far-ness of the world, and Oslo and Monterrey and Capetown are now seconds away, with visuals, and U.S. policy will be swiftly less divided with each passing year.

[bicentennial_baby]

17. All Three, National and International

:patriot:

[Muttocracy]

19. all righty then. Mercer / Edwards then? n/t

[EstimatedProphet]

20. Huh?

"Some concern?" Who's concerned? Why are they concerned? What, specifically, are they concerned about? How about a link? Cuz I have no idea what you're talking about.

[Jamastiene]

21. Off to the Greatest Page with you.

:popcorn:

[elleng]

22. Or

enforcing regulations?

POTUS doesn't do that usually; courts do.

[liberalla]

23. Hey Telly! where are you? Kojak convention in town?

Strange premise for a post.

Please expand on your comments, and include specifics (LINKS would be great!).

Thank you!

[no name no slogan]

24. He's just concerned because Jeb Bush is all in his house with disease

See #56:
http://www.mercerforpresident2008.com/c14f7f9dd9bbed555232a5cb8defd6f7.html

[sniffa]

25. All three?

National and International?