Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What lasting effect did Bill Clinton really give the party or the country?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:21 PM
Original message
What lasting effect did Bill Clinton really give the party or the country?
You want to talk trajectory, right?

Did I miss Clinton Democrat-ism?

Because I sure didn't miss Reagan Conservatism.


Like it or not, Reagan did change the trajectory of the Country in ways that Bill Clinton did not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. What is "is"? Does that count?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BringBigDogBack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
31. lol. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Bill redefined a BJ so that the rest of us men can get them without having sex.
My wife doesn't see it that way though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:23 PM
Original message
Clinton was the first president in 40 years
who left the country with a budget surplus.

You don't know what you're talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. Gosh, that's why I'm a Democrat! So the budget is balanced! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. That economy helped a lot of people, actually.nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. There's no necessary correlation between balanced budget and economic performance
the economy was due to Greenspan and productivity increases due to technology innovation and adoption. We ran deficits in the sixties and that was a good - better - economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Short term outlook
Interest on the national debt is our second biggest expenditure after defense.

If you don't think that money could be used better elsewhere, or that continuing to run $400B deficits won't be a crushing burden on our grandkids, then you won't understand how it could also cause a cash crunch in the next 10 years that will make SE Asia's economic collapse look like child's play.

The deficits of the sixties, as a proportion of GDP, were microscopic compared to the current ratio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. I'm just opposed to the Dem agenda being hijacked by Rep deficits
I've seen that show before - Dems clean it up, next Rep comes in, cuts taxes and spends like hell. Why don't we keep deficits around to impede their military adventurism?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. Unfortunately, It Wasn't A New Trajectory
It was a good thing, but only temporary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Of course it was
is he responsible now for GWB's legacy as well?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. If You Think I Meant That
I did not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
11. Real inspiring stuff that was able to be changed within a year of a new president taking over
you didn't answer my question at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
24. yes he did, and I
have admired him quite abit. He did bring us 'welfare reform' though. And there were things done clandestinely in terms of foreign policy that I was totally ignorant about, and cannot say were good. He tried very hard to help facilitate a peaceful solution to the Israeli/Palestinian situation, and came very close.

Yet, as much as he didn't intend it- there are some who might argue that in a minute way his presidency may have helped pave the way for these last 8 years of hell.

But in the end, we only have ourselves to blame.

We need to find a way to truly change for the better.


peace~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:23 PM
Original message
DLC
-ism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. He Pioneered The Use Of Outsourced Torture
And set the stage for a lot of outsourced jobs.

Pretty significant stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. Rethug neocons blame all their fuck-ups on him. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. Bill Clinton didn't give the party very much other than his own victory
I expect Hillary to be the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. Other than caving into Republicans on welfare reform and the Defense of Marriage Act
because he was afraid they would try to paint him as liberal if he didn't not much. Except, of course, for losing a sixty-year majority in the House of Representatives - there's effective party leadership!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. Too bad Obama didn't mention that it was the WRONG direction...
Edited on Thu Jan-17-08 09:27 PM by polichick
He used words like "optimism" and "clarity" ~ which sound very positive.

About Bill ~ I think he squandered an incredible opportunity, for all of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iceburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
12. When Clinton was president most of the WORLD believed in America.
Sadly there are no takers now.

Just a Canadian point of view.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
14. You ask this at least once a week...
Go back to your old thread and read through that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. I have NEVER asked this question before, so put you money where your mouth is.
Edited on Thu Jan-17-08 09:29 PM by Wolsh
Show me a post from before todays date where I even mentioned this topic and I'll pay-pal you 50 dollars. If you can't find one by midnight, you do the same for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #16
27. Yah, send me your e-mail address and I'll get right on that...
That's adorable, really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
15. Psst, Wolsh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArkySue Donating Member (647 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
18. Not a fair question.
Stinkin'W has spent the last 7 years dismantling any gains that Clinton made, not to mention flushing the $urplus down the drain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
19. Obama's trajectory? Just like Reagan? I hope not.
Reagan's trajectory led to a doubling of the national debt, Iran-Contra, Grenada, and so much more.

And Bill Clinton halted that trajectory with balanced budgets, surpluses, payments on the national debt, and left office with a projected 5.8 trillion dollar surplus -

- which Bush snatched up and blew in a matter of months with tax cuts and a war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
22. Why do you always refer to it as "the party"?
Why not "our party"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tulkas Donating Member (592 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
23. Multiple definitions of the word... is...
"I did not inhale" is a good one too


Also ane entire generation that needed to explain oral sex to thier small children because it was all over the news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cd3dem Donating Member (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
26. Amazing, dems praising Reagan... Hell has froze over!!!
and we are in it!!!!

Obama Reaganites get in line for your masks!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
28. it was better than reagan/bush-bush
but not as good as it should have been. in his defense he was the winner in a three way race and never had the american people solidly behind him. the health care disaster sealed his fate. after that he could`t do anything that was`t a compromise from weakness not from strength.
reagan had everything going for him when he took power then after he was shot his revolution was organized by the boys in the basement. by his second term he was a talking sock puppet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
29. Led to a personality cult that destroyed the Democratic party's ability to pursue policies
Everything is now person-driven, not idea-driven.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
30. I don't really know Captain Semantics....
probably the same reason I refer to it as 'The Country"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
32. His hard on gave us 8 years of Bush.
Does that count for something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC