|
I began as a weak Obama supporter, but when he began to scold Democrats for not handling religious voters with kid gloves (my paraphrase) he plummeted to below all candidates except Clinton. I was an avowed Clinton opponent and distrusted her immensely. I even voted against her in my local primary. Kucinich became my top candidate, Dodd/Biden/Richardson/Edwards were tied and Obama and Clinton were last (in that order.)
I had been distrustful of Edwards on his previous votes, but when I finally realized that his campaign was one consistent message, he began to rise in my estimation. The message resonated with me. Although I was (and still am) uncertain as to whether he fully believes it, I began to take the position that his position now is so resoundingly clear that voters would have something to hold him to. He is not asking for me to trust his judgement blindly. He is asking me to vote for a particular mandate. If, as president, he violates his campaign rhetoric, I will be able to denounce him as a fraud. But how would I know if Hillary is working out? "Things" will feel "better"? How would I know if Obama is working out? I'll feel significantly "hopeful"?
After McClurkin, Obama fell below even Hillary in my estimation. Since I learned that he supports the doctrine of American expansion and military intervention, a larger military for "battling terrorism", and since key neoconservatives (Kagan and Kristol) are excited by his candidacy (I believe genuinely excited--I've seen no convincing evidence that they have anything but good reason to be excited) it is most likely that I will not vote for Obama at all. I'm not entirely clear what he stands for (per his voting record, his associations, and his rhetoric) and it seems that he may be the 'liberal' end of the neoconservative/neoliberal spectrum. I fear that this is the 'bipartisanship' of which he speaks. This is the kind of 'new' I have no interest in. I'll take the 'old' mediocre candidate in whom I have no faith (Clinton) over the new upstart whose most salient characteristics are his religiosity, his distain for the left, a vague voting record full of holes, no apologies or explanations for his inconsistencies, and a shallow rhetoric that both dumbs down the debate and preys on people's desperation. I started with Obama as my choice and now I am fairly certain that he is the one Democrat for whom I will not vote-- the one I trust the least.
I'm in the Edwards camp now. Warts and all.
|