Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama will have the most elected experience of anyone during tonight's debate (besides Kucinich)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:31 PM
Original message
Obama will have the most elected experience of anyone during tonight's debate (besides Kucinich)
Edited on Tue Jan-15-08 01:14 PM by Bleachers7
Now that Richardson is gone, Obama will be the one with the most elected/governing experience of anyone on stage (besides Kucinich). Obama was a state rep from 1996 to 2004. He's been a senator ever since. Hillary has been a senator since 2001. Edwards was a senator from 1998 to 2004. I wonder if he's going to point it out.

Obama 11 years
Hillary 7 years
Edwards 6 years

Kucinich 20 years
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. But he's "inexperienced", remember?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah, but doncha know, state legislature doesn't count
Those guys don't do anything, you know?

In the US, All laws and decisions are made by the federal government. All budgetary decisions.

There is no such thing as a state tax or a state budget.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. nonsense. And I'm an Obama supporter.
I'd say his 7 years in the Statehouse is not quite the same thing. Yes, it's experience, but it's a part time legislature and it's not the big leagues, and it's not like he was Majority Leader in the Illinois Senate. Also, Hillary has 7 years in the Senate, not 6. O has enough experience but he certainly doesn't have more than Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
26. And, of course, Obama wants women to pray
before they have abortions...

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #26
38. and that has just what to do with what I wrote
aside from the fact that that isn't what he said. I don't like what he said but it surely wasn't the way you characterize it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #38
45. You had a very angry post about that not too long ago
before you changed your avatar.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. Yes, I did. And I still don't like that
he went to the 700 club or talked about abortion that way, but I don't expect my candidate to be perfect. I expect the plus column to have more entries than the minus column.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #26
41. Most women do n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
39. In a state like Illinois, and the progress he made
it matters. And I can't believe you'd use that lazy part-timer that the Clintons are pushing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hillary 7?
It's 2008.

Biden supporter that I am, I just wish they would ALL shut up about experience. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. You're right
I haven't adjusted to 2008 yet. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
53. Didn't She Start in January 2001?
I can't even figure out a 15% tip, so my math may be off, but I think that's 7 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. "besides Kucinich"
Anyone up for experience and real change?

I know I am, and that's why Kucinich is still my candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kucinich4America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. AMEN to that!
The Hell with "besides Kucinich". Kucinich IS the most experienced candidate. And that includes executive experience, which none of the others have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. He's also had that spine for a pretty long time.
NO to the war.

NO to the Patriot Act.

Health care for everyone.

IMPEACHMENT.

Not like the "fold up and tuck under the bed" candidates we're seeing so little from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. He may not be there tonight.
Edited on Tue Jan-15-08 01:10 PM by Bleachers7
It's still uncertain.

And I don't think you want to bring up his "executive experience."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Did you see this thread?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. There's an appeal pending.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. They did appeal? Goodness gracious... they must REALLY want him out BAD!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Why would the msm not want Kucinich there?
Disney blocked him last time, GE is trying this time...

Oh, well. I'm sure we can trust big media. They DO have our best interests at heart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Surely it's because they're trying to fashion him as a sympathetic figure.
Of COURSE the media has our best interest at heart. Cause of the free market... or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. I thought so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Surprise, surprise, surprise.
Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. Vote for Kucinich!
The only real progressive in the race!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DurShar Donating Member (122 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #19
69. I will be but have to wait until March.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
24. I am...
if only fewer people in this country were so in thrall to teevee news and "Conventional Wisdom".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. Obama .........most elected experience
But Hillary was the President's WIFE for 8 years in the WH, who can top that?!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. noone since Eleanor!
Though Mrs. Carter, Mrs. Bush, and Mrs. Bush are still out there...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. His mistress
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. Oh please, here we go again!!!
The state legislature is the minor leagues. The guy is barely in the first half of his first term as senator.

What's the point of this thread?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Do you know how to add?
That's the point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
13. So then should it read "Kucinich will have the most elected experience of
anyone during tonight's debate (besides Obama)????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. He may or may not be there.
Plus, he's not a serious contender.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kucinich4America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #16
65. Unless he wins the Michigan primary.
Then he becomes the front-runner :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. That would be the correct text if one wasn't trying to score points for
Obama. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #13
51. He meant to say
That obama has the most experience of any electable candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
14. While being a governor is important
in that the person had to propose and implement program using available resources, a legislative experience on a state or municipal level is pretty weak. Look at your own state legislators and try to figure our what they have achieved that can suggest an effective President.

Plus, I've heard that in most of his experience in Illinois most of his votes were "Present."

Last, "as chair of a Senate subcommittee on Europe, he has never made an official trip to Western Europe (except a one-day stopover in London in August 2005) or held a single policy hearing. He's never faced off with foreign leaders and has no idea what a delicate sparring match diplomacy in the Middle East can be. And at a time in which the United States has gone from sole superpower to global pariah in a mere seven years, these things matter."

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=103x332028




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #14
28. less than 3% of his votes in Illinois were present. That's obviously
not most. And though serving in the state leg may not be on a par with serving in the U.S. Senate, it is absolutely valid governing experience. Particularly as Obama's service was in a large state. Hell, Illinois is bigger than quite a few independent nations. None of our candidates has faced off with foreign leaders, for that matter, and Obama is hardly some naive character. I heard Gary Hart characterize him today as very savvy on international affairs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
15. Good thing Obama thinks we don't need a beaurocrat... go Edwards!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dpbrown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
18. Shouldn't that then read "Kucinich will have the most elected experience during tonight's debate"

Kucinich 20 years
Obama 11 years
Clinton 7 years
Edwards 6 years


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. It's not certain that he will be there.
Also, He's not a major candidate anyway.

I love your use of colors. I know it's a pain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #18
47. And we thought that only Republicans twist the facts
to justify their claims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
23. yes indeed
Very true. Kucinich of course has way more elected experience than all of them--20 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
29. Does anybody know how Obama got TRULY elected...If you wanna call it that...?
"Why say you're for a new tomorrow, then do old-style Chicago politics to remove legitimate candidates?" Askia said. "He talks about honor and democracy, but what

honor is there in getting rid of every other candidate so you can run scot-free? Why not let the people decide?"

In a recent interview, Obama granted that "there's a legitimate argument to be made that you shouldn't create barriers to people getting on the ballot."

But the unsparing legal tactics were justified, he said, by obvious flaws in his opponents' signature sheets. "To my mind, we were just abiding by the rules that had

been set up," Obama recalled.



http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-070403obama-ballot,1,57567.story?ctrack=2&cset=true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #29
34. And Hillary became a senator because of who she was married.
So Obama has an edge there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #34
40. ok...Tweety...
Edited on Tue Jan-15-08 01:32 PM by indimuse
Once again I post FACT RE: And his dishonesty...and his fans continue wear the Obama Goggles of DENIAL! I'm not quite certain if it due to mutual DRUG after effect ...but it seems quite common amongst you. strange....hmm..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. I posted fact too.
Nobody would have elected Hillary the senator from NY if she was the Arkansas governors wife. Am I wrong about that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #42
48. yes.
I'm NOT "nobody!!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #48
50. Good, I'm glad we finally agree.
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #50
55. NO...lol!
I meant NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! just alil' crazed right now...:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #42
54. And another thing...
Edited on Tue Jan-15-08 01:54 PM by indimuse
You keep attacking Hillary in a personal way...let's just LQQK at Obama for a moment...He used his Senate Fame to capitalize his Book..Releasing dirt from his past...Do you REALLY think he would have been elected even to Jr senator in Chicago if the people of Illinois knew he snorted coke and smoked pot for 2 years of his life...? THINK! Oh...But wait a minuet THAT"S right ...he ...challenging hundreds of signatures on the nominating petitions of state Sen. Alice Palmer, the longtime progressive activist from the city's South Side. And they kept challenging petitions until every one of Obama's four Democratic primary rivals was forced off the ballot.




"Why say you're for a new tomorrow, then do old-style Chicago politics to remove legitimate candidates?" Askia said. "He talks about honor and democracy, but what

honor is there in getting rid of every other candidate so you can run scot-free? Why not let the people decide?"

In a recent interview, Obama granted that "there's a legitimate argument to be made that you shouldn't create barriers to people getting on the ballot."

But the unsparing legal tactics were justified, he said, by obvious flaws in his opponents' signature sheets. "To my mind, we were just abiding by the rules that had

been set up," Obama recalled.



http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-070403obama-ballot,1,57567.story?ctrack=2&cset=true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #54
56. Obama's first book was publishied in 1995
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dreams_from_My_Father

Also, why should candidates be permitted to forge and cheat on their petitions? Do you support cheating? Obama did the right thing. Did the others?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #56
58. I guess you don't read!overwhelming legal onslaught signaled his impatience to gain office
The day after New Year's 1996, operatives for Barack Obama filed into a barren hearing room of the Chicago Board of Election Commissioners.

There they began the tedious process of challenging hundreds of signatures on the nominating petitions of state Sen. Alice Palmer, the longtime progressive activist from the city's South Side. And they kept challenging petitions until every one of Obama's four Democratic primary rivals was forced off the ballot.

Fresh from his work as a civil rights lawyer and head of a voter registration project that expanded access to the ballot box, Obama launched his first campaign for the Illinois Senate saying he wanted to empower disenfranchised citizens.


But in that initial bid for political office, Obama quickly mastered the bare-knuckle arts of Chicago electoral politics. His overwhelming legal onslaught signaled his impatience to gain office, even if that meant elbowing aside an elder stateswoman like Palmer.

SHOW ME FORGE AND CHEAT!!! PROVE YOUR STATEMENT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #58
64. You're asking me to prove your statement.
Edited on Tue Jan-15-08 02:44 PM by Bleachers7
You pulled that out of the newspaper. The newspaper doesn't say that Obama did anything wrong. Signatures aren't discarded for no reason. So isn't it up to you to prove that Obama and the board of elections did something wrong? Obama's signatures were apparently legit. Why should he be punished because others cheated?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #29
43. Nader didn't get on the ballot in Oregon
because his signatures were flawed. That's the law in every state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. And PA too.
This Hillary cheerleader supports cheating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
32. It will be a Billary presidency. Billary = experience. eom
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. Don't you see what's wrong with that?
You're saying that she can't stand on her own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #32
52. It will tough for them
They will have to find a pair of married interns to screw then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
46. I
Edited on Tue Jan-15-08 01:37 PM by Bleachers7
I touched a nerve. :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
57. of the 11 years how often was he present (pun intended)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
59. Obama has missed 16 percent of the votes while being Senator,
Now, that's leadership.

:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #59
60. Hillary has missed 15%
And yet Obama still has more years of elected experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #60
61. Clinton has missed 6 percent, show me your data.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #61
62. I'll show you mine if you show me yours
:P

You brought it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #62
63. lol, but this is a public forum.
*giggles*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #62
66. Link to Clintons missed votes while in Senate; 6 percent.
Edited on Tue Jan-15-08 02:49 PM by goldcanyonaz
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/person.xpd?id=300022

Hillary Clinton missed 143 of 2394 votes (6%) since Jan 23, 2001.

Barack Obama missed 177 of 1086 votes (16%) since Jan 6, 2005
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #66
67. Hillary's number is since 2001
Obama's number is since 2005. I'm talking about 2007-2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #67
68. The record is since both became Senator. She has a better record of voting than he does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #68
70. That's only because she more total votes.
What about the last year? They are the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC