Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John Edwards' Environmental Plan: One More Reason to Vote for Edwards

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 08:40 PM
Original message
John Edwards' Environmental Plan: One More Reason to Vote for Edwards
Pawleys Island, South Carolina – On the fourth day of the his "Bringing It Home" bus tour across South Carolina, John Edwards today discussed his bold plan to protect South Carolina's coast, fight global warming and build a new energy economy that will create more than one million new jobs. At a town hall in Pawleys Island, Edwards outlined his plan to take on the big oil companies, power companies and polluters and achieve energy independence.

Throughout the tour, Edwards has been discussing his plans to bring about bold change and fight for the middle class. Born to a working class family in South Carolina and raised in small, rural mill towns, Edwards has spent his life taking on powerful interests on behalf of hard-working families like the ones he grew up with.

"We know that global warming is a crisis," said Edwards. "We know the need for action is urgent. And we know that the steps we need to take are sitting right in front of us. But Washington is not taking them. I see the oil and gas companies blocking progress by spending millions of dollars and deploying hundreds of lobbyists to Washington to make sure that America stays addicted to foreign oil and fossil fuels.

"If we have the courage to boldly change course we can transform it into a real opportunity for America," Edwards continued. "It won't be easy, but it is time to ask the American people to be patriotic about something other than war. If we harness American ingenuity, we can emerge from the crisis of global warming with a new energy economy that stimulates innovation, brings the family farm back to life, and creates more than one million jobs in America's farms and industries."

Global warming is a crisis, and without action we could be living in a fundamentally different planet. In South Carolina, higher sea levels could wipe out miles of property. Sea water would drown marshes, leaving the state more vulnerable to hurricane-related flooding. Higher property insurance rates are likely and the threat to South Carolina's fishing and tourism industries is real.
Talking to voters as a John Edwards volunteer, I am finding that the Edwards position that is most likely to change an Obama voter to an Edwards voter is Edwards' opposition to nuclear energy. Edwards is the only candidate who opposes nuclear energy. Edwards has been endorsed by Friends of the Earth, and for good reason. Here is Edwards' excellent environmental program:


Edwards will protect the environment and fight global warming by:

* Halting Global Warming: Edwards will cap the emission of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in 2010 and reduce it by at least 80 percent by 2050. He will create a New Energy Economy Fund to jumpstart clean and renewable energy technologies and create one million jobs. Edwards will also lead the world to a new global climate change treaty.
* Achieving Energy Independence: Edwards will rebuild our economy on homegrown sources of clean energy and energy efficiency. He will invest in safe, renewable energy to generate 25 percent of the nation's electricity by 2025, reject nuclear and unsafe coal power, transform the American auto industry and meet the demand for power with efficiency.
* Reversing the Bush Administration's War on Clean Air and Water: Edwards will work to reverse every harmful environmental executive order and regulation issued by the Bush Administration, strengthen the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts, restore the "polluter pays" principle to the Superfund program, and protect and conserve open space, forests and wildlife.

Edwards' four-day tour comes on the heels of his homecoming tour, which saw crowds exceeding 1,000 South Carolinians in Clemson and 500 in Columbia. Edwards is the only candidate in the race who was born in South Carolina and he is the only Democratic candidate to ever win in a "red" state. Edwards leads the Democratic field in both campaign stops and money raised in the Palmetto State, and his campaign boasts an impressive statewide grassroots organization strengthened by deep support from Edwards' 2004 campaign.
Protecting the Environment and Achieving Energy Independence

"Our generation must be the one that says, 'we must halt global warming.' It is time to ask the American people to be patriotic about something other than war" - John Edwards

Global warming is a crisis, and without action we could be living in a fundamentally different planet. Our dependence on foreign oil also leaves us reliant on unstable and hostile areas of the world. In South Carolina, higher sea levels could wipe out miles of property. Sea water would drown marshes, leaving the state more vulnerable to hurricane-related flooding. Higher property insurance rates are likely and the threat to South Carolina's fishing and tourism industries is real.

John Edwards will take on big oil companies, polluters and power companies to address the great environmental challenge of our lifetime. We have a responsibility to act as stewards of the planet for our children and grandchildren. By harnessing American ingenuity, we can emerge from the crisis of global warming with a new energy economy that stimulates innovation, brings the family farm back to life, and creates more than 1 million jobs in America's farms and industries.
Halting Global Warming

To halt global warming, Edwards will cap the emission of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in 2010 and reduce it by 20 percent by 2020 and at least 80 percent by 2050. After a short transition period, all the permits will be sold. A portion of the revenue will be dedicated to the $13 billion-a-year New Energy Economy Fund to jumpstart clean and renewable energy technologies and create 1 million jobs. Edwards will also lead the world to a new global climate change treaty by sharing clean energy technology with cooperating nations and, if necessary, requiring minimum climate-change commitments in our trade deals.
Achieving Energy Independence

Edwards will rebuild our economy on homegrown sources of clean energy and energy efficiency. Specifically, he will:

* Invest in Renewable Electricity: Edwards will invest in safe, renewable energy like wind, solar power, and biomass to generate 25 percent of the nation's electricity by 2025.
* Reject Nuclear and Unsafe Coal Power: Edwards opposes the construction of new nuclear power plants, which are time consuming, extremely expensive, and generate waste that cannot yet be stored safely. He opposes new coal-fired power plants that cannot capture their carbon emissions and subsidies for the liquid coal industry that could make global warming worse.
* Transform the American Auto Industry: Edwards will raise fuel economy standards to 40 mpg by 2016, expand the use of biofuels like ethanol and invest $1 billion a year in helping American automakers lead the world in hybrid and electric cars and lightweight and fuel-efficient cars.
* Meet the Demand for Power with Efficiency: Edwards will set a national goal of using existing power to meet all new needs for the next decade, let power companies profit from efficiency as well as production and invest in more efficient buildings and appliances.

Reversing the Bush Administration's War on Clean Air and Water

In his first year as president, Edwards will work to reverse every harmful environmental executive order and regulation issued by the Bush Administration, strengthen the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts, restore the "polluter pays" principle to the Superfund program, and protect and conserve open space, forests and wildlife.


http://www.johnedwards.com/sc/headlines/20080114-day-four/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think he's got the weakest plan of any of the three
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fenriswolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. and whats hillaries and obamas plan?
iraq for oil?

or turn coal into a liqued and inject it into our tanks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. link and analysis please...
unless you wanna just throw opinion out there and not back it up...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Okay...
I'm irritated that Edwards puts the environment down at the bottom of his issues page in sort of an olla podrida of special interests. It looks like some staffer said "Wait, we need plans for education, um... the disabled, Pacific Islanders, and um... the environment, yeah."

Energy/Environment
Education
College Affordability
Innovation
Open Media
Veterans/Military Families
African Americans
Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders
Latinos
LGBT
Women
Young America
Older Americans
People with Disabilities
More to come

Hillary at least has her environment/energy plan as part of her pull-down menu of issues at the top.

Hillary's plan is very similar to Edwards', but she seems to focus more on the specifics of how she will achieve her plan. Edwards is all about ethanol and clean coal as much as any of them, but Hillary's got a more aggressive approach.

The problem I have with both Hillary and Edwards is that their "environment" plans are focused entirely on global climate change and not on any of the other environmental problems we face.

Obama, irritatingly enough, has changed his website so it no longer has the rest of his environmental platform, but he's been the only candidate to have an environmental plan outside global warming. He used to have stuff about land conservation and the national parks, but no more. He *does* still have a deforestation plank in his environmental platform, which I heartily approve of.

http://www.barackobama.com/issues/energy/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fenriswolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. i dont know where you get ethanol and
clean coal but his plan uses

"New Energy Economy Fund to jumpstart clean and renewable energy technologies"

coal is not renewable, ethonal has to be produced and i'm sure edwards is aware that food to fuel is a loser strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Infinite Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Anybody who's researched ethanol knows it's an impossible solution and will never occur.
Not enough supply, too high of a cost, too high of subsidies, too dependent on weather/climate variations, etc. Only the gullible fall for ethanol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fenriswolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. i agree
just another fuel that can be regulated, unlike true clean energy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. In my view, ethanol is a transition solution. It is viable
for the moment. We need to move to better fuels, but that will require time and investment. If Edwards is elected, we will see immediate use of transitional cleaner energy and then development of much more efficient and practical energy sources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fenriswolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. and just how long would we stay in this transition period
you know how easy it would be to get stuck in the ethonal era? how long has the united states been talking about getting off our addiciton to oil? We would be stuck with ethonal for a very long time all the while going wheres all the energy from the sun and wind and waves and geothermal plants?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I think that if we moved to ethanol for certain purposes
while developing other alternatives, we would move to the fuels that are most efficient in terms of expense, energy input and ease of use and marketing. I suspect that we will soon be relying primarily on solar energy (supplemented by wind energy). I have no expertise in this area. I live in California and have lived in Arizona. The deserts are an unused energy resource. I believe that in twenty years we will take solar energy for granted. It will be cheap and easy to use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. Here you go:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. SC: Edwards Calls for Ban on Coal Plants
http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2008/01/14/ap4529274.html

Obama endorses 'clean coal' (a fallacy) and biofuels (bad idea for those of us who drink water) and cosponsored the Coal-to-Liquid Fuel Promotion Act.
http://www.grist.org/feature/2007/07/30/obama_factsheet/

Clinton was the last to reveal an environmental plan, and it has problems too.
Biofuel subsidies
Clean coal subsidies
Anemic support for public transportation
http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2007/11/5/12120/4392

Edwards -
First presidential candidate to call for reducing greenhouse-gas emissions 80 percent by 2050, in March 2007. Would launch a cap-and-trade program in 2010 to bring emissions down 15 percent by 2020, as an interim step to the 2050 goal.

First major presidential candidate to make his campaign carbon-neutral, in March 2007. He's buying carbon offsets to neutralize the effects of his campaign travel and office energy use, while also cutting energy consumption at campaign offices, buying recycled-paper office products, and encouraging staff to walk to work and take other energy-saving measures. (Tom Vilsack was actually the first candidate to go carbon neutral, but he dropped out of the race in February.)

Introduced a detailed energy plan before any of the other candidates.

Proposes a $13-billion-a-year New Energy Economy Fund that would invest in renewable energy, efficiency, carbon-capture technology, and cleaner cars; help entrepreneurs start new clean businesses; encourage Americans to buy more-efficient appliances and save energy; and help workers in carbon-intensive industries transition to new job fields. The fund would be financed by the auctioning of permits to emit greenhouse gases and the repeal of some oil-industry tax breaks.

Calls for a ban on new coal power plants unless they're compatible with carbon-capture and -storage technology.

Opposes nuclear power.

Opposes government investment in coal-to-liquid technologies.

Has been endorsed by Friends of the Earth for his position on nuclear power and early support of strict climate legislation.
http://www.grist.org/feature/2007/07/31/edwards_factsheet/


I have a big problem with all of their plans in that NO ONE is discussing conservation. Us piggy little amerikans don't want to hear that we are using far more than our fair share.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. Obama supports coal and nuclear power. Boo!
That's just the kind of dirty and dangerous energy sources we don't know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. Here:
http://www.johnedwards.com/issues/energy/20070326-clean... /

"Clean coal" is coal with carbon capture technology. It's a greenwash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. We're sorry. The page you're looking for could not be found.
dead link
for those interested, here's the live link to Edwards plan for coal energy. http://www.johnedwards.com/issues/energy/20070326-cleaner-coal/
(He calls it 'Cleaner coal' by the way, obviously understands that 'clean coal' is a misnomer.)

You still haven't explained your opinion that his plan is worse than Obama's or Clinton's. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. Edwards was a leader in presenting his environmental pland
AND HAS BEEN ENDORSED BY FRIENDS OF THE EARTH! His plan is excellent.

Hillary doesn't even talk about a lot of the issues that Edwards raises. I absolutely do not like nuclear energy. I do not want my great great great great grandchildren to have to deal with the aftermath of our living it up on nuclear energy. We should not go nuclear until we know what to do about the waste.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laureloak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. More ideas from Edwards? Come and get it Clinton & Obama.
God knows, you've stolen enough from Edwards already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. Hahahahahah...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. K&R
Good post and some great information. Every Edwards supporter should commit this to memory. This must be why Friends of the Earth Action, 100,000 strong, endorse him.

Thanks for the post JD, good work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smokey nj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
14. One thing I really like about his plan is calling for Americans to make some energy sacrifices.
It won't be popular (not unlike Carter), but it's necessary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lisainmilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
16. Global warming.... another serious issue JRE has a plan for!
Edited on Tue Jan-15-08 12:58 AM by lisainmilo
Fantastic! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC