Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

An honest answer from an Obama supporter.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 12:59 PM
Original message
An honest answer from an Obama supporter.
Edited on Mon Jan-14-08 01:21 PM by Kristi1696
Regarding what's going on with this "race argument"


So this week there have been several comments that have come from either the Clintons themselves, their campaign and their political supporters. I'll try and catalog them for you:

1). The Bill Clinton "fairy tale" remark. This remark was made during a speech about Obama's position on the Iraq war. Bill Clinton characterized Obama's position that he has always been against the Iraq war as a "fairy tale". So there probably wasn't much racial-motivation behind that comment. But it should be noted that Clinton has also recently referred to Obama, a 46-year old man, as a "kid".

2). The Hillary Clinton "MLK" remark. So you may have heard that Obama has been likened to have the charisma of both MLK and JFK. Obama's charisma and "likability" is generally considered to be a problem for Clinton. You may have heard Clinton refer to Obama's perceived lack of experience, hope-mongering, and preaching in attempts to downplay his likability amongst voters. She also wanted to downplay his comparison to MLK and, in doing so, said something to the effect that "MLK got the ball rolling on civil rights, but it was President Johnson who actually changed laws". A lot of people wondered if this was a slight against MLK that downplayed his contributions to the civil rights movement.

3). The Andrew Cuomo "Shuck n' Jive" remark. In a radio interview, NY Attorney General and Clinton supporter, Andrew Cuomo, was interviewed about the NH primary process. In his remark about what candidates need to do to win such a primary, he said that "You can't shuck n' jive at a press conference". "Shuck n' jive" is a predominantly black expression that originated during the days of slavery/segregation to mean, essentially, getting away with something while actually fooling around. Some people thought this was an interesting choice of words to describe an election in which a black candidate is running.

4). The nameless Clinton advisor and the "imaginary hip black friend" remark. In an interview with the UK magazine, The Guardian, a nameless Clinton advisor suggested that Obama is not a candidate for people serious about the issues, but that if what you were really looking for in a candidate was an "imaginary hip black friend", then it would be okay to vote for him.

For each of these comments, the media, trying to stir up controversy and make this election more lucrative for them, picked up these comments and spread them widely, often disregarding the context in which they were stated. Now, taken alone, most of these comments could be perceived to be rather innocuous. However, taken together, many people started to wonder if it really could be a coincidence that so many potentially questionable comments could be coming from the Clinton campaign in such a short time span. And if it wasn't a coincidence, then what did that mean? Were they trying to say something about black voters? Were they trying to make Obama respond, assuming that the more he talks about race, the more he angers white voters? And that Hillary defending herself against such "planted" comments would get the support of white voters? Or was this the media just trying to stir shit up because, well, that's what the media does.

Really, that's up to you to decide for yourself. But, as an Obama supporter, I feel that it is my duty to tell you that Obama has had nothing to say about these comments. Only today he made a comment to make sure everyone knows his campaign is not baiting the media to publicize this issue. A spokeswoman also released a statement saying something to the effect that, "yes, some people in the community are starting to wonder if this could possibly be a coincidence". And finally, an internal memo from the Obama campaign was unearthed today that describes the background of the comments, just as I have done for you. However, this memo did not encourage Obama campaigners to talk about the comments at all. It was an FYI-type memo just to keep them informed. And that's it, as far as the Obama campaign's involvement in this matter.

I hope this has been helpful for you. I'd be happy to answer any questions.

--------------
(I posted this an a reply, but am copying it as its own thread. We all need to calm the fuck down around here.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good work, thanks! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. very interesting points
and surprisingly illuminating. Thank you.

It's surprised me how those on DU have gone from "never trust a word the MSM says" to -- especially if it's stirring the already messy pot that is the Democratic Primary right now -- "well, this is what he/she said because it's in the news".

We do need to calm down and allow the candidates to do their job: sell themselves to the Democratic Voters so we can -- without hysterics and misleading allegations -- decide who the "best" person is to get us out of the very, v-e-r-y deep hole ** and his cronies have dug us in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. You left out the Bob Johnson bull, but
that's just another brother " shuckin & Jivin." :evilfrown:
(that may have bothered me more than any of the rest of it)

Good work !

K& R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. and Billy Sheheen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I was trying to focus on the incidents of this week...
Edited on Mon Jan-14-08 01:14 PM by Kristi1696
And Shaheen was fired, so I'm going to give the Clintons the benefit of the doubt on that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Ahh, gotcha.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. It was originally posted...
...before that truly blew up.

But I'm with you on the disappointment and outrage regarding that statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. Thank you
Very well stated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. I think you got it exactly right when you asked:
"Were they trying to make Obama respond, assuming that the more he talks about race, the more he angers white voters? And that Hillary defending herself against such "planted" comments would get the support of white voters?"

YES, I think so. And even though Obama did nothing to keep it going, the media is painging it as a "trading barbs about race" which can't HELP Obama. He doesn't want to be the Al Sharpton candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pingzing58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. I'm sorry Kristi but with Obama's permission the MSM have distorted and misrepresented the Clinton's
remarks. Since GW Bush has a host of people who permit lies and half truths to circulate as their political tactics I will cannot support a candidate who is already doing that and like Bush will do that in the future. Instead of puting and end to this Obama's statements concerning the mischaracterization are "I am perplexed by her remarks." Meaning, he's going to try to capatilize on this attack of her views. I thought that he would be above that. Since he isn't I've decided today to vote for Hillary in the primaries and gen election. Obama has shown himself to be another Bush and we cannot have that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Since when does the MSM ask "PERMISSION"??
Do you really believe that? Really?

Or are just willing to believe anything that is advantageous to your candidate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pingzing58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. The truth is that the Clinton's remarks have been taken out of context and misrepresented. Obama
could have stopped this mischaraterization and continued to draw attention to the real issues, not race or gender, but the wars, the economy, jobs, etc.; but he allowed the lie to continue. Hillary was not my candidate, but today I've had to scratch Obama, and those he allows to lie in the name of his personal gain, from the list of candidates for the presidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. So now it's Obama's fault the media are running with Clintons comments?
I know that's what Clinton has been saying, but that's ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pingzing58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. He could have put an end to the mischaracterization of the remarks but hasn't. Right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. How can he speak for someone else?
How is he responsible for clarifying what somebody else said? How can he tell somebody what they meant by their remarks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #20
29. Congressman Clyburne objected
Is he supposed tell an elder of the civil rights movement to shut up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. The Clintons allowed the MSM to print those comments?
Edited on Mon Jan-14-08 02:11 PM by Kristi1696
That's what logically follows from your claim that the MSM checks with the campaigns before reporting stories.

If they checked with the Obama campaign before reporting the remarks, why wouldn't they have also checked with the Clinton campaign?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thoughtcrime1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
33. You scratched Obama because of Hillary's campaign actions?
Riiiiight. And it's Obama's fault that Hillary has decided to go this route. I see where you're coming from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Yeah, right!
He said, "I am perplexed by her remarks." That does NOT mean he's trying to capitalize on ANYTHING. SHE'S the one who said MLK couldn't have realized his dream without the help of the president. Obama didn't attack her in any way. SHE attacked HIM. THEN she claimed he was distorting her remarks just because the media SHOWED her saying what she said. For that you've decided TODAY to vote for Hillary? You don't care about her campaign implying he was a drug dealer? Or any of the other things they said?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pingzing58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. MLK was an activist and not a legislator. The importance of the President like Johnson is
inestimable concerning makeing legislation law. Bush's vetos have made him and the Repugs in congress obstructionists. MLK was an activist preacher and not a legislator. To make real change in policy one needs the help of congress and the president. And that's what Hillary was pointing out. There is nothing perplexing about this reality. Sorry, he lost my respect today because he showed himself to be nothing but a bushie politician.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. If you believe that activism is unimportant...
And that change comes from above, and not below...you might be supporting the wrong party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pingzing58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. No I'm a liberal dem. I actively work for organizing and mobilizing voters in my neighborhood to
maximize police presence, sidewalks for our children, street and draingage repaire, quality of schools, safety, etc. But we could not have done this without the support of our elected council persons, mayor, police chief, code compliance officers, state reps and senators. So, I know I'm not supporting the wrong party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #24
31. That's bull.
Edited on Mon Jan-14-08 02:27 PM by jenmito
MLK was a community organizer. If he hadn't inspired all the people he inspired to create the ground-swell of support for the cause, nothing would've been presented to the president and nothing would've been changed. And if Obama's president, he'll have the power to make the changes.

And how in the world is OBAMA a "bushie politician"??? It's the Clintons and their surrogates who've been throwing out smears against Obama for months now. Obama did nothing to lose the respect of ANYONE. The Clintons are trying to engage Obama in a race fight to try to make him look like a BLACK candidate RUNNING as a Black candidate (ala Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson) and not someone who appeals to ALL people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #24
41. Most know this but what was her point?
Theorectically Obama could also be that President that it takes. He is she saying that she is the only one who can do this.

One thing she misses is that it takes a movement to even get the attention of legislators.

If she would just explain her statement it would help. She could also apologize for any misunderstanding. Instead, she immediately blames Obama and plays the victim that someone is calling her a racist. She could have used a little humility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. Her point: "I have idiots for advisors...
Please help me"

That's what I think the truth is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. It's looking like that is the case n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. With that new list of 80-grievances he's compiled, it looks like Bill...
...may be the biggest of the idiots. What a shame.

His legacy = :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
13. there's nothing racial about someone older calling Obama a "kid" either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Suuuuure.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. find a reference.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scriptor Ignotus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. find a black man older than 40
and call him kid. see if he likes it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. I personally can't because I'm not older than 40, but I just so happen to know one in a cube...
...three down from mine.

"Ben, if an older man called you a kid, how would you feel?"

"At my age, I'd feel complimented."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. And one person represents all?
And what are you doing DU'ing when you're supposed to be working in your cube? Tsk tsk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #30
37. I was asked me to find one... so now it ain't good enough?
Edited on Mon Jan-14-08 03:06 PM by wyldwolf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scriptor Ignotus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #27
34. I see your point
I guess my point was that it's just a good rule of thumb not to call a black man kid or son, because SOME would take offense, depending upon the context and relationship between the two. that's all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. It's certainly not smart politics...
And, politicians, who spend their entire careers carefully considering their language for maximum effect, should know better.

That has been entirely the issue here. The Clintons (and their people) should have known better to say what they said, how they say them. Then begins the speculations:

-Do they know better?
-Was this intentional?
-If it's intentional, why would they say it?

and so on...and so on...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. sorry. We can't be responsible for someone taking offense at words...
...especially now that new words are being added almost daily to the "racist" list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scriptor Ignotus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. "kid" and "son"
are offense because of how they were used in the past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. if you said "boy" I would agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scriptor Ignotus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #42
47. ok
just came across this article too. seemed relevant.

http://www.suntimes.com/news/mitchell/738590,CST-NWS-mitch13.article
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. That's not entirely true.
I'm not saying this is the case here, but it is possible to intend offense without overtly implying it.

I think that Obama's "you're likeable enough" was the best example of this that you were all toting. The implications for insult were there, without overtly saying them. And I know you'll disgree, but I personally feel the same way about Hillary's "but it took a President to get it done" remark. The implications for an insult to King were there. But I still have no idea why she said it, considering they obviously don't reflect her personal feelings towards King. It was more likely the ploy of an idiot advisor.

I don't think that Hillary's a racist, but I think that she's getting some HORRIBLE advice from her advisors who seem to be willing to win at any cost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. I agree, it's beyond ridiculous. Kid, doesn't bother me, I'm considered a kid to my elders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scriptor Ignotus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
21. a fair and level-headed synopsis
this is my understanding of the issues as well.

well done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
25. It's supporters like you who remind me: I do like Obama very much really
I may get PO about some comments, threads, campaign strategies - but not about Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cloudythescribbler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
28. The media are central to this, but anyone who says the HRC camp aren't doing this deliberately ...
are naive about the politics of race-baiting.

In Russian, apparently there is a word for this kind of tactic -- provokatsiia .

Some may say that offended progressives in the media and at the astroturf roots are suckers, an approach with MORE plausibility, but frankly I think that's mainly whistling past the graveyard also.

Note how many layers of illusion one must penetrate to really get to the fact truth of what is going on. (With cries of 'tin-foil hat' thinking at every layer, and people at each new layer acknowledging the falsehood of the previous one, only to believe or at least present a new justificatory spin.) Such is a more general model of dishonesty in US politics, but it includes race-baiting within its structure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #28
36. Many here don't see the MSM's hand in this. That makes me worry for this country.
Deeply.

They're being manipulated to click websites and watch commercials. And they don't even realize it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
43. And of course, it all happened within seven days. All a coincidence? Please.
The good thing is that the Clintons know that they've been caught and they pushed this too far.

I don't think we will see them stirring this pot anymore because the entire country is watching them closely now.

Thanks for your OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 02:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC