Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Re: Tonight's Debate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Indiana_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 12:09 AM
Original message
Re: Tonight's Debate
No environmental, energy, peak oil discussion....whynot?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
revcarol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. Because Dennis would have had the floor.
20% energy indpendence by 2010.

Cain't let Dennis speak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. A little more aggressive timetable, but they share the same idea.
From Kerry's site:

John Kerry has outlined a comprehensive energy plan that will tap America’s initiative and ingenuity to strengthen our national security, grow our economy, and protect our environment. Kerry’s plan will increase and enhance domestic energy sources and provide incentives to help Americans use energy more cleanly and efficiently. When sixty-five percent of the world’s oil reserves lie beneath the Persian Gulf states and only 3 percent lie beneath America, we cannot drill our way to independence. We can, however, develop and deploy clean energy technologies that will make us more efficient and allow us to capitalize on domestic and renewable sources of energy. John Kerry’s plan for a renewable energy trust fund to invest in the development of renewable energy will reduce our oil dependence by more than 2 million barrels of oil a day – about the same amount we import from the Persian Gulf. Kerry’s plan will also create 500,000 new jobs over the next decade and work toward producing 20 percent of US energy from renewable fuels by 2020.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indiana_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. I think by 2020 we'll need more than 20% but
its a good start in the dialogue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSoundAndVision Donating Member (879 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. Well I didn't see it but....
does the moderator have a vested interest in the avoidance of those issues? YES! If we don't elevate the discussion we can't win, Dennis Kucinich for President!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. mp3 here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DebJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. website rating Congress environmental votes....look at Kerry....and also
look at Kerry compared to the other reps in his state. Wow!
Not good at all.

http.//www.capwiz.com/lcv/dbq/vote_info

I just moved from Maryland to Pa last year. Maryland's record is pretty good....but then, the Chesapeake Bay is our greatest treasure.
Pennsylvanian's don't seem to give a damn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
revcarol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Kerry used to be great. Now just like his other positions, wishy-washy, or
flip-flop whatever you want to call it. So if you look up his conservation record, it's good. However little things, like still voting for free trade even though it devastates other nations' environments, and wanting to get the oil of other nations by invasion...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corporatewhore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. you can also see you cant be pro environment and pro free trade
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
4. Because wasting precious time on gay marriage was juicier
especially for California. I do hope that this issue will not define the elections. Sure, gays have rights like everyone else, but the issues are so complex: marriage, wedding, role of state, etc., that concentrating on this - to the delight of the pubs, I would think - can actually cost us the elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indiana_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
5. I want to add other than jobs and healthcare,
these issues should have been discussed more than any other....the issues above I brought up would take care of jobs, eliminate need for wars for global oil control and more!!! I just don't understand it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
7. You didn't hear Kerry mention how enviroment needs to be on the table 10x
at least. He talked about his fight for the enviroment and how he wants to continue to fight for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indiana_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Yes, I've heard Kerry and DK talk of the issues
before but I'm just wondering why Larry King or the others didn't have more questions.....you would think they would've touched on it more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IrishBloodEngHeart Donating Member (815 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
9. because Larry King wanted to spend an hour talking about gay marriage
he is totally out of touch. Guess what Larry, if you don't have a job, you care more about finding a job than whether two gay people get married or not.

Get a clue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indiana_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. I could definitely see they were having a good time with
the gay issue. Stupid, stupid, stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC