Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Circular Firing Squad III: 60 Million Bucks Will Buy a Lot of Scriptwriters

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 04:21 PM
Original message
Circular Firing Squad III: 60 Million Bucks Will Buy a Lot of Scriptwriters
Remember that number, $60 million. It is how much money the United States Chambers of Commerce are willing to spend to make sure that John Edwards, son of mill workers, defender of consumers, champion of the middle class is not elected president. I am not sure that John Edwards has even raised sixty million dollars in his entire campaign, but special business interests in this country as so scared that he will roll back all their tax breaks and perks and government handouts, that they are willing to fork over a big chunk of the money that we, the taxpayers have been forced to give them to make sure that we are not able to pick the candidate of our choice in the upcoming election.

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-chamber8jan08,0,4301350.story?coll=la-politics-campaign

http://www.guardian.co.uk/feedarticle?id=7217369

So far, we have seen the corporate media do a ham handed job of attacking the Edwards campaign. Edwards is a phony did ok for a while, but recently people have gotten wise to the lie. The Two Man Race seemed to be working, until Edwards came in second in Iowa.

Now, the corporations are bringing out the big guns, the screenwriters, people who actually know how to write. Luckily for General Electric, they have one on staff already. Lawrence O’Donnell, formerly of The West Wing . He knows how to turn out gripping political theater for television, so he should be able to come up with some gripping political theater for America, correct?

Maybe not. It ain’t easy to turn a sow’s ear into a silk purse. When Chris Matthews presented the MSNB/GE strategy to arrange the Democratic Party into a circular firing squad last week, the third item on his agenda was this accusation:

http://journals.democraticunderground.com/McCamy%20Taylor/120

On Hardball Edwards was officially dubbed the spoiler who would prevent Obama from winning. That’s right. He is only staying in the race to steal votes from Hillary haters that rightfully belong to Obama. All his talk of One America and helping the poor is just a lie. He is wasting a year of his dying wife’s life in order to thwart Obama’s dream.


Sounds pretty ridiculous, correct? Like something Tweety would dream up in a fit of excessive motor-mouth. Hmmm. Maybe a seasoned script writer like O’Donnell could do something with the concept. Here is how he rephrased it.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lawrence-odonnell/john-edwards-is-a-loser_b_81045.html

John Edwards is a loser. He has won exactly two elections in his life and lost 31. Only one of his wins and all of his losses were in presidential primaries and caucuses. He remains perfectly positioned to continue to lose with a Kucinich-like consistency. Nothing but egomania keeps Edwards in the race now. All presidential candidates are egomaniacs but some of them have party status worth preserving that forces them to drop out when they hit the wall. A loser like Edwards has no status or dignity to lose. Campaigning and losing is his life. So, he will continue his simple-minded, losing campaign and deny Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton the one-on-one contest they deserve.

If John Edwards stays in the race, he might, in the end, become nothing other than the Southern white man who stood in the way of the black man. And for that, he would deserve a lifetime of liberal condemnation.


Did I read that correctly? Did Lawrence O’Donnell just reduce Barack Obama, the Messiah who represents everyone rich, poor, Black, White, American, International, because he is Everyman to just one demographic?

And did O’Donnell just say that Kucinich is a loser? And that Edwards is a loser like Kucinich, only with more followers? Making him the 2008 equivalent of...Eugene McCarthy??

And did he just say that Edwards is simple minded and born to be a loser? Edwards, born to southern mill workers. Does that mean he does not know his place and that all southerners born into the working class should accept the fact that they are born losers and should stay in their trailer parks where God intended them to be???

And that Obama and Hillary deserve to have a Two Man Race , because the corporate media has been saying that they should have one for months and months and Edwards wasn’t supposed to come in second in Iowa????

Oh dear. That is the best that $60 million can buy? I could do better than that for free. I am tempted to say that O’Donnell is pulling the Chamber of Commerce’s leg, setting up a straw man that will be oh so easy to knock down with the faintest of breezes. And maybe he is. However, the fact that it was written at all, means that bits and pieces of it will be quoted out of context, which will cause no end of trouble within the Democratic Party. If the GOP is lucky, we could have 1968 all over again, White versus Black heading into South Carolina, just as we had male versus female heading into New Hampshire.

Which means that O’Donnell is a bit fat race baiter as well as a bit fat stinking liar.

Hand slaps to the Huffington Post for publishing this bs simply for the controversy it would generate. Every newspaper loves to increase its circulation, but the fact that this appears in the Huffington Post will allow those intent upon starting a war between Whites and Blacks within the Democratic Party to say “Look! Look! A respectable left leaning on-line journal says that Edwards is a racist who is only staying in the race to make sure that no Black man ever becomes president!” At the very least, the Huffington Post has now lost its ability to criticize the New York Times for hiring Kristol. Any time they complain about any other papers’ editorial, that paper can respond “But you called John Edwards a phony and a racist and an egomaniac.”

$60 million dollars will buy a lot of Divide and Conquer. Who knows who is getting a book deal signed or a play put into production or a TV show considered or some other project off the ground, just for putting in a good word for the No populists allowed cause.

Last week, after the corporate media called the New Hampshire primary wrong, Tom Brokaw said something profound. Here is what I posted about it at Salon:

"BROKAW: You know what I think we’re going to have to do?

"MATTHEWS: Yes sir?

"BROKAW: Wait for the voters to make their judgment."

As if THAT would ever happen.


The problem is that the corporate media does not know how to interfere with the election process to achieve the desired result. If they were skillful enough at weaving narratives to do the job that their bosses have assigned for them, they would be writing best selling novels or screenplays in Hollywood or maybe plays for Broadway. You have to be a pretty competent artist to do what they are supposed to do.


http://tabletalk.salon.com/webx?14@519.Zw0LaejJaWy.15@.773c0c6b/9428

It looks like the Chambers of Commerce have decided not to rely upon the regular journalists of the MSM any longer. There is too much money at stake for them. They have worked too hard to create the wealth disparity that has us at their mercy. This recession could be a real boon for them. They can not afford to have another FDR come along and spoil it.

But they are going to need writers better than O'Donnell. Who will they try next? Oliver Stone? Clint Eastwood? Nancy Reagan? Get ready for some tall tales. Maybe the Democrats should consider hiring some of the striking writers to work for our side. We are the union party after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. i need an edwards bumper sticker.. 2, one for the front and back
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. Fantastic post.
We will be in for a shitstorm like nothing we've ever seen if Edwards is the candidate. Doesn't deter me in the slightest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. Off to the greatest page with ye!
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. Great post. Edwards must really be scaring a lot of people.
And not just because he's an "election spoiler".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
origin1286 Donating Member (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I can say first hand as an Obama supporter
That we don't fear Edwards. The only reason we give a shit about Edwards is because he's stealing our votes. He's like a football team getting blown out with no chance of winning, so instead of going out gracefully he takes repeated cheap shots at a quarterback's knees.

No one fears Edwards. We're annoyed with him.


P.S. Edwards is my second choice. If Obama dropped today, my vote would go to Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Baloney. I'm not annoyed with him. He should stay in as long as
he can; who knows what the future holds? And he is also my second choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. I'm not counting him out
Anyway, I'm not talking about the supporters. I mean the campaigns and the media and the corporations behind them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. "Stood in the way"?
How the hell can we expect government oversight of the Messiah? Wouldn't it be blasphemy? Wouldn't it cause rioting?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. Big K & R, MT.
The first entry in my journal is Newsweek's article about him and comparing it their article about Huckabee the week before.

http://journals.democraticunderground.com/BleedingHeartPatriot/51

This is so blatant that it's mind boggling. He is the only candidate to whom I have, or will contribute to until the G.E.

MKJ

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. I reregistering to vote
I'm changing my party affiliation from Green to Democratic for the primary so I can vote for Edwards. California voters can reregister by January 22nd for the February 5th primary.

http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/elections_vr.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. Clarity, I meant the top entry in my journal.
Can't edit, time's expired. It's technically the first, as well, I suppose. MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. Its going to get a lot nastier before the election
Edwards is on message and they are terrified.

I am going to send him another $50 today in light of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
origin1286 Donating Member (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Yes, we're terrified
Terrified that he's siphoning off enough vote to give Hillary the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. Welcome to
ignore.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
10. It's a good post. I have a question.
Are you claiming that O'Donnell was paid by the Chamber of Commerce for that hit piece?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. How can we know? They are dividing us against ourselves now with the Huffington Post Piece.
This is how Divide and Conquer works. O'Donnell will never say it is so ("Say it ain't say, Joe") but on the other hand, he is a skilled writer, not a hack like a lot of MSM journalists, so when he wrote this, he knew exactly what effect it would have on various parts of the electorate. For instance, he knew that Freepers disguised as Obama supporters would be able to cite his article as "proof" that Edwards was a George Wallace type southern White supremist segregation cadidate. He knew that these agitators would be able to create a controversy that the MSM would then be able to report as a "major battle" within the Democratic Party---to the consternation of middle of the road Americans who are looking for a "uniter, not a divider". He knew that up until now, Obama has hesitated to challenge the MSM on its biased coverage of the election and its meddling in the Democratic primary, mostly because Obama is trying to cultivate the image of an elder statesman who rises above the fray.

He also knew that the corporate media, including his bosses at GE would never ever hold it against him if he did harm to the John Edwards campaign.

The irony is that I saw a real, organic circular firing squad made up of Two people (I did not realize such a thing was possible) on Hardball Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council and some Economic Republican. Perkins loved Huckabee but hated Guilliani. The money guy hated Huckabee but loved Guilliani. Matthews was trying desperately to broker a peace between the two. The corporations want the GOP to get its act together and give the boot to the Christian coalition---without losing the Christian vote. Such a thing is impossible. So, they are trying the next best thing, which is to reduce the united Democrats to the same pitiful state of chaos that the Republicans currently find themselves in.

Do not be fooled. Solidarity, Democrats! Bush-Cheney and the NeoCons are the enemy!

PS You know all the coverage of Kenya? Does anyone here really think that the MSM really cares about violence in Africa? Ask the people of Rwanda. They are giving Kenya front page treatment, because Obama's natural father is from that country and is related to the opposition party candidate, and one of the big lies which they have planned for Obama if he breaks through and becomes the nominee is Obama is a Black Muslim which will include characterizing his father and step-father as third world terrorists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
martymar64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
13. That mick O'Donnell deserves a knuckle sandwich
Maybe he's been hitting the Guinness a little hard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Shame, shame! I'm Irish and I don't drink. Obama is part Irish. So's Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
martymar64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. My sympathies
My family is of English descent so forgive me if I'm not too friendly towards the Irish. I'm human and and prone to biases like anyone else.
Besides that point, I'd still like to give O'Donnell a knuckle sandwich. He deserves nothing less. That fucking bastard deserves more like a broken knee cap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dragonlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
18. Here's a line from O'Donnell's piece that I found ironic

The white male monopoly on the Democratic nomination has finally come to an end.


O'Donnell is white and male and part of the monopoly that is trying to throw the nomination to the candidate most identified with the status quo, as it always does. We need to nominate someone who will be on our side against the powerful interests that have us under their thumbs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. What bothered me most is his assumption that Obama needs affirmative action within the Democratic
Primary. Read what O'Donnell wrote carefully. He is saying that Obama is not good enough to win on his own, unless the White guy is pressured to bow out of the race to make room for the Black guy.

What kind of messed up shit is this?

Here is Obama at his finest.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AmUUYo9o9eg&feature=PlayList&p=B03F10C0072F4762&index=3

This candidate does not need any affirmative action. He does not need John Edwards to step aside in order to give him a level playing field. Give me a break! Obama is just fine the way he is.

One more thing, for people who actually think about their political rhetoric. This kind of "Great White Hope" argument makes no sense. If Edwards is getting votes only because he is White, then he is stealing votes from Hillary, not Obama. In that case, Obama should pray that Edwards stays in to split the White vote, so that he can clean up on the minority and disenfranchised vote. However, Obama is doing just fine on the White vote. How else did he carry Iowa?

Everything O'Donnell wrote is nonsense. They will try anything to force Edwards out of the race. I am waiting for a study that says that political campaigns cause breast cancer in the candidate's wife.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dragonlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Excellent points
I didn't even think about the affirmative action aspect, because Obama is so clearly doing fine without it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
23. I can not help thinking of the "ethics" of Johnny Caspar in "Miller's Crossing"
when he is complaining that his fixed fights don't stay fixed.

What O'Donnell said: "deny Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton the one-on-one contest they deserve."

They deserve? If the two of them have not knocked Edwards out of the running yet, this is somehow John Edwards' fault?

What O'Donnell meant to say was : "deny Obama and Hillary the one-on-one contest we at the corporate media have worked hard to achieve".

Or, to co-opt the Cohen Brother's dialog (with O'Donnell playing role of Johnny Caspar)

I'm talkin' about ethics.
You know I'm a sportin' man.
I like to lay the occasional bet.
But I ain't that sportin'.
When I fix an election--
I figure I got the right
to expect that election
to go off at one to one.

I like sure things.
I fixed the election.
Individual donor money
comes pouring in.
The odds go straight to hell.

So, back we go
to these questions--
friendship, character,
ethics.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
24. Oh man! MSM says "jump", DU says "How high, sir?"
The WaPo gave us "The Good Lie" and "Pelosi Knew" and yet when they print a story whose only purpose is to make Obama supporters hate Hillary supporters, what do we do?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=203&topic_id=493172&mesg_id=493172

I'm going to bed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClericJohnPreston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Fantastic post!
I so despise the Corporate handlers running this Country.

It is plain as day that Corporate America and Mr. Donahue and his strident rhetoric, want to keep citizens as little more than cattle, bred for consumption of Corporate goods.

I hate the DLC, always have, and anyone that is a Corporate enabler.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClericJohnPreston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. k&r!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC