Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Will Obama supporters who have used the misreported Cuomo story now apologize to Cuomo and Clinton?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 07:05 PM
Original message
Will Obama supporters who have used the misreported Cuomo story now apologize to Cuomo and Clinton?
http://www.theleftcoaster.com/archives/011711.php

Rumor, Hysteria, and Reflexive Hillary-bashing

by Turkana

Yesterday, the internet went viral with claims that New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo made an odious racist remark about Senator Obama.☼ Even though Cuomo doesn't even have an official capacity with the Clinton campaign, she, once again, was held personally accountable, as if she is responsible for every person who merely supports her. Well, it turns out that Cuomo didn't actually say what he was purported to have said.

<edit>

Of course, it did go viral, as does every rumor that can be used to demonize Senator Clinton.☼ But the Times Union now offers the actual transcript of Cuomo's comments:

You know I’ve spent a lot of time in other races, especially in Iowa and in New Hampshire, back with Gore and back with Clinton. Those races require you to do something no other race does, you know, and I like it, and I agree with you, it’s a good thing. It’s not a TV-crazed race, you know, you can’t just buy your way through that race , it doesn’t work that way, it’s frankly a more demanding process. You have to get on a bus, you have to go into a diner, you have to shake hands, you have to sit down with ten people in a living room. You can’t shuck and jive at a press conference, you can’t just put off reporters, because you have real people looking at you saying answer the question, you know, and all those moves you can make with the press don’t work when you’re in someone’s living room. And I think it’s good for the candidates, I think it makes the candidates communicate in a way that works with real people because you know in a living room right away whether or not you’re communicating, and I think the questions are good and I think the scrutiny is good, so you can, you can say they’re small states and they get a lot of attention — they are very good for the process, I believe that.

In other words, he wasn't talking about Senator Obama, at all. He was talking about the game of politics, in general, and all politicians, in general. His actual comments on Senator Obama? Politico's Ben Smith offers this:

"Barack Obama is a beautiful symbol. He's a powerful speaker. He's a charismatic figure. And what he has to say is important for the Democrats," Cuomo says in the interview, with the New York Post's Fred Dicker.

Will the Obama supporters who have used this misreported story now apologize to Cuomo and Clinton? I'm guessing not. Will Senator Obama be held accountable for the despicable comments of his own campaign co-chair? I'm guessing not. This race is getting ugly, and it's going to take a great deal of effort to get people to focus on the honest facts.

end...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. He was talking about Republicans
Cuz they're always shuckin' and jivin'.

:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hmmm... interesting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Right, the stereotype just came to his head while he was thinking about Dennis Kucinich
I don't buy that. I know the context is, he was talking about all the candidates but I think it's obvisou he was thinking of Obama. If I were supporting his opponent in a primary and I said, well, you know, sometimes candidates make you an offer you can't refuse, don't you think he would be outraged?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. How many words from the African American experience are now in common speech?
If I say "Okay," am I being racist?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. How often do you hear 'shuck and jive' in conversation? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
36. Never.
I had to look it up. Slave-era rhetoric is NOT part of my vocabulary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #13
53. I have heard it, referring to sales pitches.
Those "shucking and jiving" were white.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #13
58. My teachers in grade school used it often.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Didereaux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
27. 'Black' slang and colloquilisms permeate our everyday language. No pun, it adds color.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #27
43. Your usage of "pun"...
Edited on Fri Jan-11-08 08:24 PM by 2rth2pwr
The word pun itself is thought to be originally a contraction of the (now archaic) pundigrion. This latter term is thought to have originated from punctilious, which itself derived from the Italian puntiglio (originally meaning "a fine point"), diminutive of punto, "point", from the Latin punctus, past participle of pungere, "to prick." These etymological sources are reported in the Oxford English Dictionary, which labels them "conjecture." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pun


...could be seen as calling someone an Italian Pr*ck
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #11
38. Yes, because it's a reference to Oklahoma. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kucinich4America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #11
41. No, but if you said "OTAY"
You might be.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. nice spin
and i'll give you a rec to send you to the GP so more can see it. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. Spin? What spin? He quoted the exact words which people here have misquoted....
...and turned into a racist attack on Obama.

I gotta say - are the Obama internals telling something really so bad that it has cranked up the racism brigade?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. you're really desperate
but what do i know, i'm just shucking and jiving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #18
28. Desperate? Seeing racism where there is none is real desperation.
Two African-American Congress ladies say there was nothing racist about the MLK or the fairy tale things.

Go here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

Stephanie Tubbs Jones. ; Sheila Jackson Lee, comments

.........“To say that there is a pattern of racist comments coming out of the Hillary campaign is ridiculous,” said Ohio Rep. Stephanie Tubbs Jones. “All of the world knows the commitment of President Clinton and Sen. Clinton to civil rights issues — and not only the commitment in terms of words but in terms of deeds.”


Referring to the King quote, Sheila Jackson Lee, another Clinton supporter, said Clinton was trying to contrast King and Obama, not to diminish King: "It really is a question of focusing on the suggestion that you can inspire without deeds — what is well known to the child who studies Dr. King in school is that yes, he spoke, but he also moved people to action."
...............


http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0108/7845.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. um, no, that's racism
and to defend such shit, is sickening. and yes, desperate. but i'm glad you were able to trot out some black people to say it ain't so.

DU has been quite offensive lately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #28
52. Stephanie is her national co-chair
She's going to try and spin it for her candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. Keep on spinning
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. Chances of an Obama supporter coming in this thread to apologize?
Less than winning the lottery while being struck by lightning twice at the same time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. NEVER.
AND they will keep repeating the old, incorrect story.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. Divide and conquer- we always fall for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. He was clearly referring to Barack. Cuomo endorsed Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #10
50. Your first sentence has already been demonstrated to be absolutely false by the OP
Edited on Sat Jan-12-08 09:21 AM by Seabiscuit
which contains Cuomo's actual words, which don't refer to *any* of the current candidates, but rather to campaigning in general.

Are you trying to reignite the flaming falsehoods spread earlier by the vile Obamazombies responsible for twisting and misrepresenting Cuomo's words?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
12. He should've said
"You can't tap dance around the questions at a press conference."

Oh wait...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
regnaD kciN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
15. If you don't think that "shuck and jive" line was a reminder that Obama was one of THOSE people...
Edited on Fri Jan-11-08 07:20 PM by regnaD kciN
...you're so deep in denial, you'll need to be rescued by Egyptian scuba-divers. :eyes:

Sorry, but no apology. As your candidate says about her vote to authorize the Iraq War, "get over it."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
16. People see what they want to see...
they hear what they want to hear. Even if it wasn't the intended meaning. It's just paranoia if you ask me. And no, I don't suppose any of them will apologize, or even acknowledge that they were over reacting. As usual.

Eventually, our vocabulary will be so limited, so sterile, that saying HI will be seen as an accusal of being on drugs.

You just can't say anything anymore. We need a verbiage manual to apease everyone these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
17. No they won't. Many are small and petty. They not only perceive slights where there is none
but they see "code" in their acid trips

Don't bother to HOPE they will Change to classy individuals, anytime soon

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. you add so much to DU
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. You too
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Durtty Libby does
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Thanks JD. Back atcha
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
19. Nice try. The question is, would he have used that expression if a black man..
weren't in the race? We'll never know. But many journalists, politicians, etc. who have analyzed these comments say "NO".

You must remember that politicians are essentially professional speakers. They make a career out of knowing how to choose their words carefully. Are we to think that Cuomo has gotten this far in his political career without a knowledge of which terms are racially charged? Gotten this far with a habit of blurting out statements without considering them first?

You may be naive, but I am not. He knew what he was saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. He's said it as many times as Hillary's cried
Why do people pretend to not know why these things happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anouka Donating Member (712 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #19
42. No, he would not have. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moriah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #19
48. Uh, yes, he would have, I think -- the term is used in politics
Edited on Sat Jan-12-08 08:05 AM by moriah
People who, according to Google, have been accused of "shuck and jive":

The Clintons
Scott McClellan, the former White House Press Secretary under Bush
George Allen, Republican senator
Steve Forbes (in referring to his advocacy of the flat tax)
Donald Rumsfeld
George Bush
Ronald Reagan
Al Gore
Jaime Rubin, adviser to John Kerry
Robert Beauprez, former Republican representative
Rudy Guiliani
Mike Huckabee
Alan Greenspan
Karl Rove
Tim Russert (he may not be a politician but he sure gets into politics)

and too many more for me to list.


I'm not saying that it was smart for him to say it -- but if he was stupid enough to say it, I really don't think he thought about the racial implications. I mean... think about it... if he's a Clinton supporter would he WANT his candidate to be associated with racism???

Oh, and if you really want to see offensive, check out the hit from Google for the term from Rense. Yes, it's about Obama, from March of 2007. Of course, it was Rense, a website with already notable racism against Israel. From his context, it was obvious it was about Obama and his race.


edited for typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moriah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #48
49. and to clarify...
I cannot see how the supposed "Clinton strategy" -- race baiting -- would work for a Democrat. For a Republican, maybe. But not for a Democrat, and not in a primary election.

Why?

Look at South Carolina, where half of the registered Democrats identify as African-American. Clinton's strongest support in both Iowa and New Hampshire came from registered Democrats -- Obama swept the Independents. Why alienate 50% of your prime base just to attract bigots to the polls? Even in other Southern states, like Georgia where 25% of registered Democrats are Black, that's still alienating 25% of your base who might have otherwise supported you.

Now, for Rethuglicans, the strategy might work. The Democratic party has depended on the support of the Black community, and with good results. A Rethuglican who doesn't care to attract Black voters and likely wouldn't attract them anyway would benefit from the few bigots that got motivated to go to the polls who might not have otherwise.

Hillary is depending on Super-Duper Tuesday, and most of the states in that primary are Southern, including mine. When many white Southern registered Democrats already vote Rethuglican in national elections, she NEEDS that base of support. If the "Clinton Machine" is so calculating and so dangerous, wouldn't they have thought about this???

It makes about as much sense as trickle-down economics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
22. If somebody talked about candidates needing not to be "hysterical"
It would give me pause just as much as this did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
23. I hope so.
The people pushing the race agenda do so at their own peril. The people in Iowa voted for someone they thought was a good man and would make a good President. Keep it up and the rest of the country will begin to think about the fact he is a black man first and then decide if he is worthy of the office or not. Demographics are not on Obama's side. This division is what the Republicans are hoping for.

This situation is going to tear the Democratic Party and the country apart. I am now praying that this divisive activity on all sides stops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #23
32. When the comments are coming from the Clinton camp, tell me..
Who exactly is pushing the "race agenda"?

Am I to hold Barack Obama responsible for comments made by Bill or Hillary Clinton or their supporters? Am I to hold Barack Obama responsible for journalists deciding to publish these remarks.

Please tell me how this has anything to do with Barack Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. You think Clinton - I think Obama.
And who is pushing the sexist agenda - Obama. As in his Co-Fucking-Chairman Jesse Jackson Jr.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #34
39. Wait, you think that Obama is writing Bill and Hillary Clinton's speeches?
That the Obama campaign is saying, "hey Andy Cuomo, why don't you try saying "Shuck n' Jive"?". That they are telling Hillary's staffers, "call Obama an 'imaginary hip black friend'".

You think that these things are coming from the Obama campaign and that the Clinton campaign is actually listening?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #39
44. No response about Jackson? Ummh.
Go read up on the Cuomo comment now that it was all been posted. Also, Cuomo is not working for the Clinton campaign.

Hip black friend - thought I read that this was un-sourced. It was not a staffer.

Jesse Jackson - I watched it spew right out of his mouth on the tv. He is the National Co-Chairman. Dig out of that.

As for you - goodbye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #44
51. And WHERE is OBAMA'S APOLOGY RE: JJJ???
Funny how Obama's National Co-Chairman escapes criticism for the most DISGUSTNG comments on National TV and yet you people hold Hillary's feet to fire for statement she has ZERO control of. And still she is honorable enough to make public apologies for...you're a disgrace to the party!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
29. BTW, please remember it was Ben Smith at politico who misrepresented then "amplified" the remarks.
Edited on Fri Jan-11-08 07:46 PM by BleedingHeartPatriot
POLITICO IS DETHPICABLE



MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. That is a very good point!
Truth be told, the Albany reporter who first blogged about them did take them out of context. But it was Ben Smith who got the ball rolling on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. politico is trying to position itself as THE online political reporting site, but it's as RW as
they come.

MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
35. So the "outrage" was false? Knowingly false?
That's not surprising, unfortunately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vee Donating Member (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
37. What do you say about this?
Edited on Fri Jan-11-08 08:25 PM by vee
You have to get on a bus, you have to go into a diner, you have to shake hands, you have to sit down with ten people in a living room. You can’t be a Miss Prissy at a press conference, you can’t just put off reporters, because you have real people looking at you saying answer the question, you know, and all those moves you can make with the press don’t work when you’re in someone’s living room.

How's that? Is this offensive?

Would Hillary supporters be upset if this is what he said? Hell yeah, and for good reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jasmine621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
40. I doubt it. They are going to "Cheney" these media-hacked issues for their benefit.
Edited on Fri Jan-11-08 08:22 PM by jasmine621
To "Cheney" an issue: To continue to repeat previously proven lies and unproven and unsubstantiated allegations to fit a propaganda point...as in Iraq and Saddam were involved in 9/11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CyberPieHole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
45. Good luck in getting Obamanations to see the light...their love of Obama is FAITH BASED...
and not subject to facts.

:kick: and recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #45
54. I hate this name calling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SIMPLYB1980 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 02:23 AM
Response to Original message
46. Nope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 04:06 AM
Response to Original message
47. Cuomo's words were taken out of context, but Jesse Jr.'s were not.
Edited on Sat Jan-12-08 04:07 AM by Beacool
To those looking for "code" words at every corner, please stop with the race baiting!!! The only thing that you're doing is ticking off a lot of white people. A good friend of mine shocked me this evening by saying that if Obama's campaign is going to continue race baiting she might consider voting Republican if he were to get the nomination.

We don't need to go down the path of race and gender baiting, in the long run it'll only end up hurting all our candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #47
55. We don't want to tick off the white people
It's not Obama's campaign who is pushing this. It's many African Americans who felt uncomfortable about these comments. I do agree the that Clintons are not racists and that JJJ's comments were wrong.

What many whites don't understand is that their is a huge difference in intent and perception. There have been a series of statements made that ahve been insensitive. The choice of words have been ill advised and I'm actually surprised that the Clintons, of all people, were not more sensitive to this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
56. Turkana
posted the same thing at KOS, but it was given a lot more consideration there, than it will probably receive here. The replies are interesting:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/1/11/153410/328/73/435213


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #56
59. Thanks for the link. A nice discussion.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
57. The Obama attempt to Swiftboat Clinton over this was successful.
No one will listen to the retraction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC