So who should have won the party nomination in 2004?

[XemaSab]

I've seen an awful lot of Kerry bashing lately.

Has there been a big change in how people feel about having Kerry as our party's nominee? :shrug:

Who should have won the nomination?

[Superman Returns]

1. probably clark

Wesley Clark would have been the most electable but you know, sometimes Generals aren't the best when it comes to domestic policy and being under the scrutiny in politics. Not sure it would have played out but a Clark/Edwards ticket would probably have been a winner. Yes, I know they hated each other.

[Systematic Chaos]

2. I voted Kucinich only because he's my fave - nothing against Kerry.

Of course, the whole election thing was a farce and we know this. They made sure nobody from the Dem side was going to take it, so this is all kind of a moot point anyway.

[FSogol]

3. Gore SHOULD have started his 2nd term. n/t

[Kucinich4America]

4. Howard Dean

He would have slaughtered Chimpy in the General, and this country would be well on the road to recovery by now.

[XemaSab]

6. Sez Kucinich4America...

:P

[Kucinich4America]

8. Where do you think I got the "4America" part from?

If Howard had run this year, I would have supported him again.

[XemaSab]

11. That's what I suspected

:hi:

[CTyankee]

5. OK, who's the wiseguy who voted for Lieberman?

geez.

My vote was for Clark. I think he could have beaten Bush.

[Radical Activist]

7. Edwards would have won.

He was the better candidate that year.

[bigwillq]

9. Dean

:bounce:

[William769]

10. Kerry should have he got the most votes didn't he?