Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

We can't afford to have the White House as a training ground for an inexperienced man

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
denem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 10:57 AM
Original message
We can't afford to have the White House as a training ground for an inexperienced man
Edited on Fri Jan-11-08 11:04 AM by lamprey
"I say we can't afford to have the White House as a training ground for an inexperienced man who is rash and impulsive." Richard Nixon on JFK, October 1960.

If the outcome of the nominations is McCain v Obama, there is a wealth of material to be found in the 1960 campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. McCain is Dole part II. The only one McCain could beat is Hillary
with the help of Nader and Bloomberg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. McCain could campaign on experience.
And he is the only Republican with any credibility on that score.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Nixon, Dole and Bush I did the same thing and lost
Experience is low on voter's priorities right now. We all have seen the experience of Cheney and Rumsfeld in action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. None of them really have relevant executive experience...
Edited on Fri Jan-11-08 11:10 AM by Bread and Circus
Clinton: law school, failed d.c. bar exam, passed arkansas bar exam, corparate lawyer, did many social work projects for children, wife of POTUS (not a cabinet position FYI), senator.

NO executive experience! None. Nada. Zip.

Obama: law school, president of harvard law review (a student journal), did some social work projects for inner city issues, senator.

NO executive experience! None. Nada. Zip.

Edwards: law school, trial lawyer, senator

NO executive experience! None. Nada. Zip.

Business, military, and government executive experience is a far cry from legislative, legal, and social project experience.

Do we have that straight?

now... let's proceed.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. failed d.c. bar exam
Is that true? Just curious, I never heard that before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Yes, I understand it is true
and was instrumental to her decision to move to Arkansas and practice law there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anouka Donating Member (712 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. regarding that,
did she get political help to pass the Arkansas bar; or was it fair and square, on the up and up?

(I'm reminded of John John and his failure of the bar.... people love John John, but how many people really believe he finally passed the bar on his own the third time and not without a little help? I'm sure they do exist, I just don't know how many if it's many.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Girlieman Donating Member (399 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. That confuses me
I've read that too, but it confuses me, because when I graduated from law school (a few years after HRC), the only requirement to the DC bar was graduation from an accredited law school. Something of a joke, really.

Perhaps I've remembered it incorrectly. Maybe somebody else knows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Girlieman Donating Member (399 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Unconfused
I looked it up. Admission into DC bar is automatic if you're admitted anywhere else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. It is true. What I've read is that it incidentally slipped out in a private
conversation between her and a friend. But is in the public now and a confirmed fact. Granted, 50% of people who take the D.C. bar fail the first time.

However, she decided not to try again and instead passed the bar in Arkansas and got a corporate law position there.

The big picture issue is that Clinton touts her experience, but it's not necessarily the right kind of experience for the times nor is it tangibly more impressive than Edwards or Obama.

It's mostly just smoke and mirrors.

Granted though, Obama and Edwards are really in the same boat experience wise, Edwards probably the least of the three.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anouka Donating Member (712 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. they're running on the (non?)fiction of Hillary being co-president
yeah, a woman with no security clearance was co-president for 8 years.

but the argument is offensive in several other ways, because no one has experience with being president until they are president.... and such an argument actually argues against members of minority groups being allowed a shot at the presidency since those groups are going to have less experience with higher office because those groups have less people making of the majority of higher office in this nation.

might as well argue that white men can be expected to have the most experience. that's what it reads like beneath everything.

for trying to make history as the first elected female president, Hillary sure does shoot equality in the foot in her quest for herself and not the nation ... in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. Does anyone really think America will elect a Catholic president? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
13. That was a pretty close election
if memory serves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC