Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cuomo's 'shuck and jive' comment spurs controversy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 09:39 AM
Original message
Cuomo's 'shuck and jive' comment spurs controversy
Cuomo's 'shuck and jive' comment spurs controversy
BY ERIK GERMAN | erik.german@newsday.com; Staff writer Meli
January 11, 2008

ALBANY - If you asked the bloggers yesterday, State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo stepped on a rhetorical land mine when he used the racially charged phrase "shuck and jive" while discussing the Democratic presidential primary in a recent radio interview.

Speaking Tuesday to the New York Post's Fred Dicker, whose show airs on Albany's Talk 1300 radio station, Cuomo said of the early primaries: "It's not a TV-crazed race. Frankly, you can't buy your way through."

He added later, "You have to sit down with 10 people in a living room. You can't shuck and jive at a news conference; you can't just put off reporters, because you have real people looking at you, saying 'answer the question.'"

The 1994 book "Juba to Jive, a Dictionary of African-American Slang," says "shuck and jive" dates back to the 1870s and was an "originally southern 'Negro' expression for clowning, lying, pretense."

A truncated version of Cuomo's quote appeared first on the Albany Times Union's Capital Confidential blog Wednesday with the claim - later clarified - that he was talking about "Hillary's win in New Hampshire."

Like a virus, the notion that Cuomo had made a racially insensitive remark about Barack Obama's loss leapt from Web site to Web site yesterday.

Politico.com entered the quote into its so-called "department of word choice." Wonkette.com. called the term "racist."

But several sites, including Newsday's SpinCycle blog, posted updates after hearing from Cuomo.

"The attorney general was clearly saying that Iowa and New Hampshire were important primaries because the candidates could not duck the tough questions," said Cuomo spokesman Jeffrey Lerner. "He clearly meant no offense to either candidate because he was praising both in the interview. 'Bob and weave' would have been a better phrase; that's certainly all the attorney general meant."

Joseph Mercurio, a New York City-based Democratic media consultant, said he doesn't think Cuomo hurt himself seriously. "Everybody's being a little politically correct," Mercurio said. "I think he had enough support from black voters in his campaign that this isn't going to be a big issue."

Perhaps Mercurio knows. He currently works for Sen. Joe Biden (D-Del.), whose January 2007 remark that Obama was the first black presidential candidate "who is articulate and bright and clean," drew wide criticism but didn't end his Senate career.

But Temple University's Nathaniel Norment Jr., a professor of African-American studies, said the history of the Cuomo's phrase made it inappropriate because it springs from an ugly period of our past.

<SNIP>

http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/ny-uscuom115533466jan11,0,3011306.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlueManDude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. a lot of these pols just aren't that bright.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoxFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. A low-voltage pol coasting on daddy's name
Why does this ring a bell?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. He's not stupid at all..
that's what makes me wonder why he would say something as stupid as this...:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. We can't escape the ugly period
of our past. I feel this is piling on in order to be politically correct. I've heard that expression forever not really knowing what it meant. I thought it meant trying to pull the wool over one's eyes. Must we disect everything anyone says to put a spin on it? One thing sorely lacking in this political climate is civility. Certainly some things can be uncivil, but must we beat it to death in order to prove a point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. It doesn't mean "bob and weave" - It's not even close
The explanation is preposterous. It has always meant "style over substance," or some false front put on to avoid work. That it meshes so cleanly with the whole "style v. substance" talking point is no accident at all (Indeed, for all its other uses, the whole "style v. substance" argument is itself deeply racially coded, and has a long history of being applied to African American speech - since Phyllis Wheatley was called a "parrot" who could say the fancy words, but knew not what they meant).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
5. The kid couldn't carry his dad's jock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC