Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

South Carolina Primary Will Use Paperless E-voting

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 08:41 AM
Original message
South Carolina Primary Will Use Paperless E-voting
Article: November 18, 2007

The 2008 Presidential election may hinge on a primary in which the votes are recorded and tabulated exclusively by paperless electronic voting machines.

South Carolina's primary will be pivotal in the nominating process of both major parties. South Carolina uses a paperless touch screen system statewide, the ES&S iVotronic. It is apparent from the state Election Code that this is the system used for primary elections (section 7-13-1900).

Paperless e-voting is reckless in any right, but the iVotronic has managed to become notorious on its own terms.

It is the machine of Sarasota 2006 fame, producing 18,000 undervotes in Florida's 13th Congressional District, as well as high undervotes in other races in six Florida counties that used the machines. It is the same machine whose firmware version 8.0.1.2 was described by Princeton University computer scientist Edward Felten as "terribly insecure" and in need of serious improvements before it used in another election.

<snip>

http://www.votetrustusa.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2653&Itemid=113

:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. No Transparency = No Democracy nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. Oh crap.
Will we ever be able to trust election results again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I have just tried to respond to you a number of times and I find
I'm getting so angry, I kept deleting it. I'm angry because we can not trust any election results and it will never be trusted again unless the people take to the streets and demand transparency. The problem with this is, well, after 2000 and 2004, if so many Americans didn't "get it" then, I'm afraid of what it would take in order for them TO get it. Chances are, others call the shots and will continue to do so until they are stopped. We have a LONG way to go. I think we may address global warming before that occurs. How's that for a bleak outlook?

Sad times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
4. If you want auditable ballots in SC, all you have to dois insure a Dem
wins the General Election! The people there are primarily evangelicals of the strongest order, and as long as a Pub keeps winning office, they will not have a problem with the voting machines. If they lose JUST ONCE he machines will be changed in very short order!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zalinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Except not all dems are aware
or at least don't seem to be aware of what is going on. Kucinich and Edwards has been the only ones talking about paper ballots.

zalinda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. When I lived there they used punch cards! Seems like they went from bad to worse! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Perhaps those were the only candidates you were paying attention to
but they are not the only two talking about it;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDfqqKurwv8
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zalinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. He's not in the race anymore
which is a pity.

zalinda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kucinich4America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
21. How can you insure that a Democrat wins the General Election
When you can't even insure a Democrat wins the primary??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
8. I expect Obama and McCain to win in SC. But no paper trail is bad news anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddy Waters Guitar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. Yeah, I see this is "candidate-independent"
For the very health of our democracy, we need to have systems that produce a clear paper trail that can be audited. Touch-screen voting systems, especially the hackable ones being used in SC, are just not acceptable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
9. My vow, to keep this kicked, because it has nothing to do with which candidate wins
Edited on Fri Jan-11-08 10:18 AM by cryingshame
on unaudited and/or paperless electronic machines. It has everything to do with Democracy and Integrity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddy Waters Guitar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. I'm with you
Folks, no matter which candidate you support, you have to fight hard for transparency. A sense of disenfranchisement leads to rioting or even violence as we've seen in Kenya-- push for paper ballots in SC, do whatever you have to do, protest, disrupt the state legislature, whatever. We have to move immediately!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
11. My head just exploded. I have no words. (enjoy it while it lasts, doesn't happen often)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddy Waters Guitar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
12. Any Dems in SC, push hard to move to paper ballots that can be audited, now!
This cannot be allowed to happen again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddy Waters Guitar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. I heard though can't confirm that a petition is circulating for this,
but a petition is not enough. People in SC-- go to the statehouse and put tough pressure on them to demand paper ballots, counted twice!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
13. What The F**k!
:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
15. This is very discouraging
We have got to get paper ballots and automatic audits. I hope the hand count people are happy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddy Waters Guitar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Shows lessons are not being learned
No democracy without transparency
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddy Waters Guitar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
17. Any updates on this?
Caught the tail end of some comment about the election commission changing their plans on the radio. Any truth to it? Anyone in SC with details?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kucinich4America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
20. Time to break out the bats
And I don't mean, in the Howard Dean sense.

Smash these foul electro-fraud devices, force them to use paper ballots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
22. Damn. Isn't it strange that Obama won in NH precincts where they used PAPER ballots and Hillary
won where they used electronic voting machines? Hmmm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC