Endorsements by Elected Officials before the Convention starts really suck.
This is the people's country and the people's election. Our elected politicians should keep their mouths' shut until the convention has nominated their candidate. We do not need their spin or influence to select our candidate.
I really feel our democracy and particularly our elections are being taken away from the people inch by inch.
The power of super delegates and endorsements by elected officials of candidates before the convention is an abomination to our electoral system.
Plenty of endorsements go out every election cycle. Whats the point of endorsing at the convention, when the nominee has, normally, already been known for six month?
I see nothing wrong with elected officials endorsing candidates before or after a primary. In fact as hard as I try, I can't think of a single reason for them not to do so. I don't see them having any more 'inlfluence or spin' than any other well-known person who endorses a candidate. I daresay that the endorsement of HRC by RFK JR (not an elected official) is as influential if not moreso than Kerry's endorsement of Obama. What about former elected officials, like Gary Hart? Should he shut up? What about community leaders that aren't politicians? Union leaders? Celebrities? Why should an elected official's endorsement be seen as any different from those and what evidence is there that it is?
but there other benefits than just having the name behind you. For instance, they often share mailing and fundraising lists, which can be very valuable.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.