Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chris Matthews' Greatest Sexist Hits

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 08:49 PM
Original message
Chris Matthews' Greatest Sexist Hits
Daily Kos: Chris Matthews' Greatest Sexist Hits
by Plutonium Page
Wed Jan 09, 2008

Earlier today, I posted about Chris Matthews' remark today that Hillary Clinton is doing well in the Democratic primaries because "her husband messed around" and that she didn't become a Senator "on her own merit" but because people felt that "(she) stood up under humiliation..." (among other odious statements).

Now, I'm just going to let the following Chris Matthews quotes speak for themselves. Then, at the end of this post, you'll find two ways you can contact MSNBC to let them know what you think.

*June 13, 2005: On MSNBC's Hardball, host Chris Matthews said Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) "looked more witchy" because she criticized the Bush administration's homeland security spending priorities on July 8, a day after the London bombings...

MATTHEWS: I hate to say this. I'm not going to hate to say it. It's a fact. You (referring to Clinton) look more witchy when you're doing it like this.

*November 6, 2006: Discussing the victory speeches of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) and House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi (CA) during MSNBC's special election coverage on November 7, co-anchor Chris Matthews told Republican pollster Frank Luntz that Clinton gave a "barn-burner speech, which is harder to give for a woman; it can grate on some men when they listen to it -- fingernails on a blackboard."

*August 10, 2007: On the August 10 edition of MSNBC's Hardball, during a discussion of recent financial news, host Chris Matthews told CNBC's Erin Burnett: "(Y)ou're beautiful" and "(y)ou're a knockout," before closing the interview by saying, "It's all right getting bad news from you."...But at the conclusion of the interview, Matthews asked Burnett, who anchors CNBC's Squawk on the Street and Street Signs, "Could you get a little closer to the camera?" Burnett replied, "My -- what is it?" Matthews then said, "Come on in closer. No, come in -- come in further -- come in closer. Really close." After Burnett began to comply, Matthews stated, "Just kidding! You look great! Anyway, thanks. Erin, it's great to -- look at that look. You're great." He went on: "No, you're beautiful. I'm just kidding. I'm just kidding. You're a knockout. Anyway, thank you, Erin Burnett."

*September 26, 2007: During last night’s post-Democratic presidential debate analysis, MSNBC host Chris Matthews was hung up on the fact there is a woman running for president. After questioning Sen. Chris Dodd (D-CT) about Sen. Hillary Clinton’s (D-NY) position on entitlement reforms, he then asked Dodd, "Do you find it difficult to debate a woman?" Dodd, not surprisingly, said, "(N)ot at all."

*November 18, 2007: On the November 18 edition of the NBC-syndicated Chris Matthews Show, host Chris Matthews teased a discussion by asking, "'She Devil?' Republicans are absolutely demonizing Hillary Clinton." While he spoke, an image of Clinton appeared on screen with the words "She Devil?" below it...

MATTHEWS: "She Devil?" Republicans are absolutely demonizing Hillary Clinton. Rudy openly mocks her, and Mitt says she'll run the country into the ground. Are Republicans trying to win by branding a President Hillary as unthinkable?

*December 4, 2007: During the December 4 edition of MSNBC's Hardball, host Chris Matthews asked about Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY): "So does her attack on him (Obama)for having had ambition as a teeny-bopper -- not a teeny-bopper, a kindergartner, does she look like Nurse Ratched here?" This is not the first time Matthews has referenced Nurse Mildred Ratched, a character in Ken Kesey's novel and in the movie based on the novel, One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, when discussing Clinton. In fact, a Media Matters for America Nexis search found that hosts, including Matthews, and guests of programs on NBC, MSNBC, and CNBC have a long history of associating Clinton with Kesey's fictional character, whom Cliff's Notes describes as a "scheming, manipulative agent" who "asserts arbitrary control simply because she can."

*December 17, 2007: On the December 17 edition of MSNBC's Hardball, host Chris Matthews claimed: "Every day I pick up the paper and there's another quote out there from somebody who's a wannabe, saying whatever the Clinton people told them to say apparently." Moments later, Matthews asked Financial Times U.S. managing editor Chrystia Freeland: "Aren't you appalled at the willingness of these people to become castratos in the eunuch chorus here or whatever they are?" (Part of an ongoing "castrator/ballbuster" narrative in relation to Sen. Clinton.)

*December 17, 2007: MATTHEWS: The biggest news of this week, it's all weekend -- it's all we've been talking about, it went again this morning. The worst week of last week was Hillary Clinton. She may have gotten The Des Moines Register's endorsement the other day, thanks to her husband's lobbying with its female editors and publisher, but voters have spotted the dagger, and they don't like what it looks like. Hillary's loyal lieutenants are ready to scratch the eyes out of the opposition right now.

MSNBC contact information at link: http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/1/9/15149/90400/455/433806?f=h_top
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
origin1286 Donating Member (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. I skimmed through them...
Edited on Thu Jan-10-08 08:54 PM by origin1286
It's really fucking annoying when using gender specific terms/analogies is considered sexism. Comparing her to a female character in a popular book is not sexist. Only a few of the quotes you posted genuinely were.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I'm guessing this would be more obvious to some people
if these were all racial slurs/demeaning attitudes instead of gender related.

We are raised to believe that gender slurs aren't slurs at all, just the natural order of things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
origin1286 Donating Member (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Bull shit
If Obama was compared to a popular black character in a book, how is that racist? If I compare Obama to Grant in "A Lesson Before Dying" does that make me racist because Grant is also black?

I find it more offensive to totally overlook someone's gender/race when making analogies. If Hillary only got compared to men or Obama only got compared to whites it sends the message that those two groups are the standard of comparison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. What if he compared him to "Buckwheat?" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
origin1286 Donating Member (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. What if I compared you to Straw Man?
But, to respond to your fallacious argument, buckwheat has come to be a derogatory & racist term, regardless of what it started out as.

I don't think "Nurse Ratchet" is quite the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lukasahero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
28. Sorry but you're playing both sides
So to take your argument about how it's ok for Matthews to use Nurse Ratched as a comparison because he doesn't like Ms. Clinton, it would then be alright for him to use Buckwheat as a comparison for Mr. Obama if he didn't like him. Yes? If not, why not? Why is "Buckwheat" a recognized derogatory and racist term but Nurse Ratched, a well-established literary archetype, not a gender derogatory term?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
origin1286 Donating Member (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. No
Nurse Ratched is not a gender specific term.

If someone were to say, "He is like Nurse Ratched except male" the metaphor would still make sense.

If someone were to say, "He is like buckwheat except white" the metaphor wouldn't make sense given the common association with the term.

Buckwheat is a racially specific term. Nurse Ratched is not because the metaphor about Nurse Ratched has more to do with what she represents than with her gender.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #34
48. I disagree
Nurse Ratchet is a stereotyped character. She is the "cold cruel power-hungry bitch" that professional women are almost always portrayed as in popular media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
63. Isn't 'Nurse Ratchet' an epithet used against women
Isn't 'Nurse Ratchet' an epithet used mainly against women, which has over the years become synonymous with 'bitch'?

I've never heard a guy called 'Nurse Ratchet'...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. you're saying Nurse Ratched is a "popular female character"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
origin1286 Donating Member (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Not popular as in well liked
But popular as in well known.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. well, there's the rub--and that's what makes your analogy
wrong and Sparkly's right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
origin1286 Donating Member (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. So because Matthews doesn't like her
And compares her to a well known female character that people don't like...he's sexist?

Give me a break.

Hillary is a well known female that some people don't like.
Nurse Ratched is a well known female character that people don't like.

If someone doesn't like Hillary, Nurse Ratched is a perfectly apt metaphor. Think about what she represented in the novel. Thats what she represents to a lot of her detractors.

It's not sexist to compare her to someone who happens to be a woman. If her gender is irrelevant than so should be the gender of those she is compared to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 03:32 AM
Response to Reply #18
57. Give it up
You're obviously insensitive to women's oppression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
origin1286 Donating Member (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. I'd also like to add that...
Matthews didn't make up this metaphor.

From wiki:

"She has also become a popular metaphor for the corrupting influence of power and authority in bureaucracies such as the mental institution in which the novel is set."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lukasahero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
24. Maybe you should read the damn book
Nurse Ratched is an archetype. The comparison is not benign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
origin1286 Donating Member (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. I've read the book
And wrote a paper on it. Granted it was for an undergrad course, but still.

Nurse Ratched has come to represent corrupt power and authority. How do you think Hillary detractors feel about her? That she is corrupt and will do anything to seek power.

I don't necessarily agree with the metaphor, but if that is the point Matthews was trying to make it is perfectly apt. Just because Ratched happens to be a woman does not make the comment any more sexist or any less valid to those who subscribe to that belief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lukasahero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. Hey, I can read Wiki too
Interesting how you left out the first line of the opening paragraph though "A cold, sadistic tyrant, Nurse Ratched has become the stereotype of the nurse as a "battleaxe.""

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nurse_Ratched
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
origin1286 Donating Member (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. Actually...
I quoted Wiki earlier in the thread and gave wiki credit. If you actually read what I wrote instead of rushing to get your talking points out, you would have seen that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lukasahero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. Nothing of substance left to offer so you move next to insults?
Ok. Bored now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
origin1286 Donating Member (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. If you consider that an insult
I'm going to start calling you Paper Thin Skin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lukasahero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. One last time - if you have nothing of substance to offer on the discussion at hand
why bother? You can call me whatever you want. I'd rather discuss why you still haven't addressed the first line of the entry in wiki ""A cold, sadistic tyrant, Nurse Ratched has become the stereotype of the nurse as a "battleaxe.""
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
origin1286 Donating Member (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. That part of the wiki is irrelevant
Because Clinton isn't a nurse.

The corrupt power is what Matthews was getting at. Characters in great works of literature can represent more than one thing, you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 03:34 AM
Response to Reply #43
58. "Because Clinton isn't a nurse"?
Now you're really getting ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 03:30 AM
Response to Reply #4
56. What if Obama was compared to Sambo
That's a better analogy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. Why not compare her to a character who isn't of the same gender?
People differ in many ways other than gender.
Calling attention to someone's gender in workplace and professional settings is rarely appropriate and serves to reinforce the message to women that "you don't belong here."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
origin1286 Donating Member (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Whats wrong with comparing her to a character of her gender?
Ignoring gender/race (only comparing women to men and only comparing blacks to whites) is just as offensive. It presents the idea that men/whites are the standard of comparison for everyone else.

I'm not saying Matthews isn't sexist, but I strongly disagree with some of the examples.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. I explained to you what was wrong. Try opening your mind.
The alternative is not comparing women only to men or blacks only to whites.

The alternative is not making an issue out of what is irrelevant or having different standards based on gender, race, age, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
origin1286 Donating Member (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. If Hillary's gender is irrelevant
If Hillary's gender is irrelevant, which I strongly believe it should be, then by the same standard the gender of those she is compared to should be irrelevant.

You can't say Hillary's gender is irrelevant but the gender of those she is compared to is relevant, because by doing that you automatically make gender a relevant issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. Comparing her only to the worst nightmare female characters consistently is sexist.
Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
origin1286 Donating Member (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. So...
Edited on Thu Jan-10-08 09:28 PM by origin1286
Gender is a relevant issue to you, then?

If gender is irrelevant, gender is irrelevant. Can't have your cake and eat it too. The comparison to Nurse Ratched was clearly the best comparison for the point Matthews was trying to make considering what Nurse Ratched represented in the book and what the term "Nurse Ratched" has come to mean. You guys making it more about gender than the underlying metaphor makes gender relevant.

So which is it?

If you don't get the Nurse Ratched reference, don't comment on it.

Also, just because gender is irrelevant doesn't mean we should avoid all references to Hillary being a woman. When making a metaphor or comparison, it is best to use someone or something that is most similar to the thing you're trying to make a point about.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. When was the last time a man was compared to Nurse Ratched?
Why not compare Clinton to Hannibal Lechter? Oh yeah, because she's female and that would be dumb.
The underlying metaphor is not why Matthews compared her to Nurse Ratched. It's her gender.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
origin1286 Donating Member (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. The only role gender played
Edited on Thu Jan-10-08 09:38 PM by origin1286
is in seeking the closest metaphor he could find.

Just because sex plays a role in a metaphor does not make the metaphor sexist.

There happened to be a female character who fit the bill of how Matthews felt about Hillary. Why should he reach further into bag just to avoid ridiculous cries of sexism?

So what Nurse Ratched is a woman? If you've read the book, you'd understand what Matthews was saying about Hillary and it had nothing to do with gender. If you haven't then I understand your confusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. I have read the book. Matthews was being lazy by using the reference.
Edited on Thu Jan-10-08 09:42 PM by Gormy Cuss
No confusion here.
Nurse Ratched is a woman who strikes fear in men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
origin1286 Donating Member (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Then you of all people should understand
That it is a perfect metaphor for how some people feel about Hillary. You should see that while Matthews may have searched for a character of the same gender, that doesn't make it sexist. The best metaphors are the ones that are most similar to what you're comparing.

People know about Nurse Ratched and what they think about her. By comparing Clinton to Ratched, people understood how he feels about her, even if they don't agree.

If he compared her to a black man, there would be a disconnect there because how outwardly different they appear.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Yeah, because people are that shallow.
Next up, Matthews will compare Clinton to Lorena Bobbitt.

Using such narrowly defined roles exposes Matthews as a very insecure man. A self-confidant person would be able to compare her to men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
origin1286 Donating Member (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. So for the sake of not appearing sexist
He should search for a different metaphor than one that is obviously very apt for what he was trying to describe?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Why yes, because he has so consistently applied only sex-specific metaphors. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
origin1286 Donating Member (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. Because
A metaphor is much more powerful when the 2 things being compared are outwardly similar.

There is less of a disconnect.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Only if you assume the audience is one dimensional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
origin1286 Donating Member (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. Not necessarily
Like I said, if you compare Hillary to a black male, there is a disconnect because they are so outwardly different.

Outward appearances are the first thing we notice about people. To pretend that people don't notice and identify people by their appearances first is defying psychology and human nature.

That doesn't make it sexist. It's easier to imagine Hillary in the role of Nurse Ratched because they are both women. Once again, that doesn't make it sexist.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ismnotwasm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #27
50. Bullshit
"Just because sex plays a role in a metaphor does not make the metaphor sexist." That would depend on what you consider sexist, now wouldn't it? In this case it sure in the fuck is. Moreover he uses sexist terminology repeatedly. He's an ass, as well as an opportunist, pure and simple. Arguing the value/intent of metaphor use is ridiculous in this case-- not the very valid accusations of sexism.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
origin1286 Donating Member (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #50
53. Just because someone's beliefs on a topic are typically ridiculous/sexist
Does not automatically make everything they say on that topic ridiculous/sexist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #26
44. Yes, and on top of that literary comparison
there is the castration metaphor he uses - and that is related to why he uses the nurse ratched analogy. It's not just a domineering personality he's threatened by - oh no, it's far worse. It's a domineering woman. Horrors. The gender of Nurse Ratched is an integral part of the character as archetype, and in fact she is accused of wanting to castrate the patients in the ward, and another character, remarking on her, says that older single nurses should be fired (the cause of their castrating-like behavior is their own need to get laid, apparently - without that, they aren't feminine enough).

If you pick the most anti-woman stereotypes of female characters to compare someone to, you shouldn't be surprised if someone calls you on your sexism. The buckwheat question above was spot on, compare a person to an extremely racially charged image, and you should expect people to call you on your racism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
origin1286 Donating Member (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #44
52. Oh so
Matthews is saying that Hillary is like Nurse Ratched because Hillary wants to castrate males?

Come on.

You seem educated. You know the overriding theme (corrupted authority) that comes with Nurse Ratched. While the gender is an integral part in the story, gender plays no role in what she has come to represent, which is that of a corrupted authority figure who thrives on power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #23
64. Maybe this will help you a little...
Maybe this will help you a little...

Gender is (and should be) irrelevant to the victim (and to all of us) *until* the aggressor (the sexist) makes it relevant. At that point, the victim may validly point out the sexism of the remark without be sexist him/herself.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thank you. Letter sent. I find him really disturbing.
Edited on Thu Jan-10-08 08:54 PM by annie1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'm going to go out on a limb here and make a prediction: If
Hillary becomes the next POTUS, I think Chris should re-tool his resume. Bill Clinton has a long memory and a long arm. He will not be forgiven. Personally, I think I'd vote for Hill just to watch that happen. He's scum and needs to be removed from the airwaves. Let Keith have the big office...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
10. to Elizabeth Edwards..
after she ripped him up for not covering 2nd place winner from Iowa - something like "I love your smile... you've got a great face" or vice versa. Ugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yeah, they certainly leave a bad taste in the mouth, don't they?
Or a strong urge to slap him, hard.

He's also got this weird obsession with Hillary Clinton in particular. I've made a joke about counting how many times in a show he mentions her (and this is for years now). He's one strange guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ismnotwasm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
12. Can he get any more disgusting?
Of course he can. I think this is only the tip of the ice berg, these horribly sexist things that make the news. For him to be so sloppy, so unprofessional and so ignorant, I shudder to think what he must be like in person.

Walking example of sexual entitlement right there, in his little slice of misogynist TV heaven.

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. Write him if you didn't get a chance.
fuck that motherfucker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ismnotwasm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #21
49. I did an email
I'm going to send a snail mail as well.

I ignore him mostly, but when it's summed up and in your face like this-- the guy's a complete asshole, and I don't know why anyone defends him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bellasgrams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
22. Maybe he just wants to suck up to his GOP bosses
I don't care to watch him. He yells alot, interrupts his guests, look like he gets so excited he spits on them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
45. Go to mediamatters.org for more evidence
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
46. thanks for posting this
It's stunning to read them all together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
47. eunuch court? She devil? This passes for discourse these days.
MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
51. Tweety is a misogynist pig who happens to be obsessed with Hillary!!
Ditto for Dick Morris.

These sexist bastards can't go a day without bashing Hillary, but if she looked their way they would fall at her feet. These type of jerks only view women in sexual terms, Morris admitted fantasizing about her and Tweety supposedly "melted" when she patted his cheek and hugged him this week.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 02:27 AM
Response to Original message
54. He sounds more confused and off the wall daily
Like he is having this mid life crisis and learning how to deal with blacks, gays and women, now in his 50 semester in the school of life.

Can tweety.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 03:29 AM
Response to Original message
55. god, what a scumbag n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 04:32 AM
Response to Original message
59. Matthews has clearly got some issues; if he's married, his wife must have some too. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snarkturian Clone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
60. I remember when this happened
August 10, 2007: On the August 10 edition of MSNBC's Hardball, during a discussion of recent financial news, host Chris Matthews told CNBC's Erin Burnett: "(Y)ou're beautiful" and "(y)ou're a knockout," before closing the interview by saying, "It's all right getting bad news from you."...But at the conclusion of the interview, Matthews asked Burnett, who anchors CNBC's Squawk on the Street and Street Signs, "Could you get a little closer to the camera?" Burnett replied, "My -- what is it?" Matthews then said, "Come on in closer. No, come in -- come in further -- come in closer. Really close." After Burnett began to comply, Matthews stated, "Just kidding! You look great! Anyway, thanks. Erin, it's great to -- look at that look. You're great." He went on: "No, you're beautiful. I'm just kidding. I'm just kidding. You're a knockout. Anyway, thank you, Erin Burnett."


Does anyone have a video link of this? I wanted to show it to some people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #60
61. Here it is, Cloney --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snarkturian Clone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #61
62. thx NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC