Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Stupid-assed WaPo article characterizes Obama as a randy 9-year-old

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 08:33 PM
Original message
Stupid-assed WaPo article characterizes Obama as a randy 9-year-old
I kid you not:

Was Young Barry Obama Too Girl Crazy?

Young Barry Obama reportedly was known for three things at the primary school he attended in Jakarta in the 1960s -- his smarts, his popularity ... and being gaga for girls.

He was so "naughty," according to a report by Al Jazeera English, that the other boys on the playground regularly tied Obama to a tree.

What did young Barack Obama, the senator from Illinois and presidential aspirant, do that was so naughty? "He's very much chasing ladies," former classmate Bandung Windardijanto tells the global news network.

Windardijanto shows several photos in which he appears with young Barry, as they called him then. You can see some of the photos in the video below, which we strongly encourage you to watch. And sure enough, in one of the photos, a 9-year-old Obama is surrounded by -- what else? -- girls.

"He chase ladies and then he run away. And then everybody try to catch him up," Windardijanto says. With his thick accent, he says something about Obama getting "smashed" against a bamboo fence

Maybe that's why, many years later, Obama took tae kwon do at the swanky East Bank health club in Chicago. His campaign declined to comment on the senator's tae kwon do, or his alleged schoolboy fascination with girls.

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/sleuth/2008/01/was_young_barry_obama_really_t.html




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Tacky and juvenile article.
Who wrote this crap?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. I am now officially an Obama supporter
Randy Sub-Teens Unite!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. A stupid and pathetic story... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1620rock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. What do you expect from that rag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. sucky ass dog whistle smear
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KennedyGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. Just as stupid as the front page article examining the Clinton marriage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. The washington post is beneath contempt. They free passed the idiot
and the war we are in, and therefore are directly responsible for it also

Barack Obama received his bachelor of arts degree in political science from Columbia in 1983, and his J.D., magna cum laude, from Harvard Law School in 1991. While at Harvard, he served as the president of the Harvard Law Review.


http://www.law.uchicago.edu/faculty/obama


Eat that washington post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC