Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Giuliani Says Immigrants Must Speak English, Airs Political Ad In Spanish

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 11:01 AM
Original message
Giuliani Says Immigrants Must Speak English, Airs Political Ad In Spanish
Dan Abrams has been documenting the misstatements and missteps of some of the presidential candidates on the campaign trail and Wednesday night, he pulled out a whopper from the nosediving Mr. 9/11 himself. Shockingly, this little gaffe had nothing to do with 9/11, it was all about immigrants and language.

Rudy has been pretending to be tough on illegal immigration and has repeatedly said that he believes all immigrants should be able to read, write and speak English in order to become U.S. citizens — then turns around and airs a campaign ad in Florida …wait for it…in SPANISH. Abrams and guest Rachel Maddow couldn’t contain their laughter…neither could I.

Maddow: “How do you say hypocrite in Spanish?”

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/01/10/giuliani-says-immigrants-must-speak-english-airs-political-ad-in-spanish/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lisa0825 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. I heard that last night.
Edited on Thu Jan-10-08 11:02 AM by Lisa0825
That was SO DAMN FUNNY! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. In all fairness this is simply a distinction
between what he wants - English for US citizens (the requirement already exists of course but it's minimal at best) and what is the reality now (a substantial portion of both citizens and noncitizens who have limited proficiency).

He's a tool yes - but this is not a demonstration of his tooldom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Well said, dmallind. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Oh, it's hypocrisy, all right...
...to pretend that English can do everything while still pandering in Spanish for every possible vote. The distinction isn't hard and fast here, and probably highlights his pandering more than his hypocrisy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. I think you're wrong about that --
"English for US citizens (the requirement already exists of course but it's minimal at best)"

There is no requirement, and has never been a requirement that citizens speak English. Neverthess, 2nd generation immigrants always do, and by 3rd generation they seldom speak anything but.

The claim that English is required is nativist crap that we, on a progressive board, should not be repeating as a fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Ermm sorry but yes there is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Happyhippychick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
3. I would REALLY appreciate it if some respect was shown and
you would use the proper spelling of the Mayor's name.

It is 9iu11ani.

Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
5. It is already part of naturalization.
Edited on Thu Jan-10-08 11:20 AM by Mountainman
I think this is just playing to the anti immigrant crowd for votes.

http://immigration.findlaw.com/immigration/immigration-citizenship-naturalization/immigration-citizenship-naturalization-test-overview.html

What to Expect on the Naturalization Test
During the course of the naturalization process, an applicant for U.S. citizenship will be scheduled for an interview at a local U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services office. At the interview, the applicant will be tested on his or her ability to read, write, and speak English, and will also be given a civics test to measure his or her understanding and knowledge of U.S. history and government.

Note: Some applicants may be exempt from all or part of the testing process due to their age or mental condition.

Language Test

The English proficiency test demonstrates that the applicant will be able to take part in the economic and social aspects of life in the U.S. The test has three parts:

Reading: To test reading ability, an applicant may be asked to read out loud certain parts of Form N-400, Application for Naturalization.

Writing: To test writing ability, an applicant will be asked to write one or two simple sentences.

Speaking: An applicant's speaking ability will be tested when the applicant answers questions about himself or herself during the course of the interview.

The applicant need not be bilingual to pass this test; basic proficiency is adequate. If you have problems with English, you may want to consider taking an English as a Second Language course prior to naturalization.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. But it's absurdly simple.
I could pass that test in French, and with a bit of practice in Italian (I did actually pass it in English, but since that's my native language not relevant). I am by no means capable of living a fully engaged life in France or Italy. I would be unable, without significant improvement, to understand many necessary documents or navigate bureaucracy, or find all but the most menial employment in a French or Italian speaking workplace.

Citizenship requires a significant period of residence before applying. It varies on the visa but in my case was 5 years. I think it's appropriate to require some level of language proficiency that would allow a person to fully engage in society, and there is certainly enough time to learn basic English skills before you naturalize. I'm certainly not in favor of an English test to get off the plane - but we need to encourage language proficiency too. I wouldn't expect every immigrant to be able to discuss the history of metaphysics or explain quantum theory in perfectly structured and pronounced English of course - but to be able to read and explain something like a basic newspaper article, or a work instruction or procedure that would be encountered in a typical job.

I'm obviously not anti-immigrant (that would be startlingly hypocritical) but we're not helping immigrants at all if we don't ensure they can function and fully participate in US society.

Just last year I was weighing two career options. One of them was in Shanghai. It's a very cosmopolitan city with lots of English signs and speakers, but even visiting with a view to possibly living there - most likely only for a few years - I took the time to learn some basic Mandarin - which is a pretty tricky language especially if you are tone deaf like me - the emphasis and pitch changes meanings dramatically. Now I couldn't have a prayer of navigating everyday life in Mandarin of course, but I certainly would have got up to that level as quickly as I possibly could, because to do otherwise would have limited my ability to not only prosper and succeed but to become part of the community itself. No matter how many people spoke English - and most of the businesspeople do - I would have been very uncomfortable and limited without knowing some Mandarin. It is obviously the same for immigrants here who are not from English speaking countries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
6. Why should immigrants be able to speak English when in America it has not been
spoken for years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC