Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

For the sake of credibility lets not claim fraud.....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 08:24 PM
Original message
For the sake of credibility lets not claim fraud.....
unless we have compelling evidence and especially when it's between democrats in primaries where upsets are bound to occur.

By claiming fraud at the drop of a hat we reduce our credibility on the subject.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eileen_d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. No shit! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. THANK YOU
Damn, this place reads like the red scare of the 1950s today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kajsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R.

You said it!


:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. and if a democrat wins in November i bet no one will be claiming fraud then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Der Blaue Engel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Have you met Republicans?
I fully expect the biggest tantrum in the history of politics to break out following a Democratic win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kucinich4America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. The 'Pukes will.....
And let 'em do so. Maybe then something will get done about this shit, if there's enough pressure from both sides.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Good point! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. f them but they probably will try to claim that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. Easy for me, since I don't think there WAS fraud. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Highly likely none occurred but we shouldn't even be bringing it up without something
to back it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. Agree. I'm over my tinfoil Diebold moment. I'm finally convinced women and the pity vote were
responsible :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kucinich4America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. For sake of credibility, let's storm the polling places
And smash these fucking worthless machines, so there is no longer a question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ORDagnabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. I agree lets count the votes and compare them to the machine tabulations
and find out why they seem to only poll correctly in hand counted areas.

polling to hand counts = correct
exit polling to hand counts = correct


polling to machine counts = error
exit polling to machine counts = error

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
9. Good for you.
Fraud would be a very serious problem. It is also a crime in your better jurisdictions. So, you are eminently correct that any charge of such a crime should be accompanied by some pretty compelling evidence; and statistical "evidence" doesn't come close to making the grade.

I'll be happy to look at any real evidence of fraud. If it holds up, *anyone* from *any* camp (or Party, for that matter) can count on my support in finding and prosecuting the offenders.

But crazy ass claims based on emotions and statistical cherry picking and/or manipulation is counterproductive, dishonest, and totally unjustified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC