Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Russert says Obama's internals had him up by 14%...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:53 PM
Original message
Russert says Obama's internals had him up by 14%...
And Hillary's had hers down by 11%...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Can anyone say racism?
Ask Tom Bradley or Doug Wilder about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Ohy please...I know you just saw that on MSNBC...
There is no evidence whatsoever for that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. I don't get MSNBC
What else explains such a dramatic shift in one day?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. Many things...
Polling models were wrong, the beating Hillary took in the prses produced a backlash, great campaigning by Hillary in the last few days....many many things...perhaps voters were reminded of the Hillary they had been supporting up until the last weel and switched back...

There is no logical reason to believe 14% of New Hampshire voters are racist enough to not vote for Obama but say they would to pollsters...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antiimperialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. I think whoever posted this thread is lying about Russert saying this about the internals
I say ban him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. I heard Russert say that too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. I hate to think
thats what happened here. I would much rather focus on Clintons efforts. Also the vote breakdown does not scream racism to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas_Kat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. you're kidding... you and tweety, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. Oh, here we fucking go....
Edited on Wed Jan-09-08 12:00 AM by 1corona4u
Candidate Votes Vote % Delegates Projected Winner
Clinton 99,392 39% 9 Winner
Obama 92,653 37%
Does that look like racism to you???? Better get Sharpton & Jackson on the phone!!!!

Start this shit, and it's going to be a SHORT campagin!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. Something stinks...
...and the MSM presstitutes just orgasm all over themselves...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think those were real.
I think Hillary had quite a day yesteday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. I don't believe a word russert says, but if that is true then the people are lying to the polls
Edited on Tue Jan-08-08 11:55 PM by still_one
Did he mention ANYTHING about the 17% undecided?

If not he is a liar



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. that's not the only option. There is Diebold being used extensively in NH. Who knows.
and that's the sad thing about non-secured electronic voting.

It makes questioning ANY election results on such machinery a bit more valid.

note-I'm not saying this is what happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. Will the Democrats in Congress have zip about that also, so obviously they don't care /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. What a strange story today was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. Bizarre
but you'd have to know how they were modeling it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
9. NH has proven to be unpredictable.
This is politics, expect the unexpected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
10. Yep, and I wonder with a post here on DU today if the machines....
were at play in NH... Hmmmm I guess we will never know and so it goes...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
11. Very odd
When every external poll is outside the margin of error, and the internals are too, something unprecedented has happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
13. Matthews: Somebody's got some splain to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
15. I also heard Obama's people say there was a 16-point swing in the women's vote
from yesterday to today. I don't buy the racism angle; sounds like there was a major stand-up-for-Hilly moment with females.

More to learn here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #15
22. I think that is definitely part of it...
Perhaps in the last couple days she reminded people why they liked her in the first place...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. And/or they realized she was toast if she got rolled in NH
so they stood with her. Obama won the female vote 35-30 in Iowa and lost it 47-30 in New Hampshire. That kind of variance suggests some special things happened in NH, and we certainly saw some of that yesterday.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
16. And maybe Obama fans were over confident??
As an Obama fan.. i'll admit, at 3pm today, I was feeling pretty good. Ya have to wonder.. with lines wrapped around the block.. and Obama supposing to have a 7% - 15% lead.. who got back in their warm car.. drove home, and thought.. eh, he'll win.. no need to shiver?

Just a theory.. just a theory!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
21. Bradley/Wilder effect? nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
23. I thought Bill Clinton's exasperation today...
...indicated that their own internals weren't looking so well.

If your internal polls are up, you are relaxed and confident.

Bill seemed to be going into the ditch.

I'm concerned about this. I'm concerned about dirty tricks from the Clintons. I'll be honest.
I've always wondered why the power Dems didn't push for election reform. I assumed that at least
some of them would benefit from cheating, at some point.

However, in this situation---I feel as if a couple of things affected NH voters. I think they're
fiercely independent, and they will sometimes use their votes to show that THEY DECIDE. I think
Obama fever hit its pitch in NH, and by the time voting came around--many switched to Clinton. I
do think that her teary moment probably led people to think..."You know she's got a bad rap and maybe
she's not all that bad." I think some of those people went for her.

I don't know. It's just really hard to reconcile all of this. A CNN story had 300 people at one of her
events. The Obama rally had 2,000, and a line out into the street.

It's puzzling.

In all honesty though, I think both camps are in shock at this point. Different kinds of shock, but shock
nonetheless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #23
27. Thank you. I don't feel so creepy now that I know somebody else feels the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 02:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC