Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

St. Pete Times Politifact Checkers: last five statements of candidates...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Sancho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:24 AM
Original message
St. Pete Times Politifact Checkers: last five statements of candidates...
Edited on Tue Jan-08-08 07:57 AM by Sancho
This is not an endorsement of any given candidate, and all statements are listed on the site. It's just a way to look at trends for those interested in honesty.

http://www.politifact.com/

Hillary's last 5 statements:
2 True, 1 Half-true, 2 Barely-true

Obama's last 5 statements:
4 False, 1 Barely-true

Edward's last 5 statements:
3 Mostly-true, 1 Pants-on-fire liar!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. link doesn't work.... will maybe believe it if i see it, where is the ReThug side. why is that miss'...
really why is the thug side missing and you bash the dems...???
and the link doesn't work
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sancho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. All candidates have a lengthy list of statements...
whether your agree with the rating or not, you can check what Politifact says. I'm not "bashing" anyone, just letting folks see what the St. Pete Times reports.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. Here's their latest rulings (not quite what OP suggests.)
Edited on Tue Jan-08-08 07:35 AM by MethuenProgressive
This link works: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2008/jan/06/two-parties-one-night/

SUMMARY: We find some truth, some exaggerations and a Pants-on-Fire falsehood at the dual debates in New Hampshire.

ABC News billed Saturday night's dual debates as "Two Parties, One Night," which conjures images of friendly get-togethers with cocktails and hors d'oeurves. But they were more like raucous family dinners where the kids can't stop heaving insults at each other.

At the Republican debate, John McCain and Mike Huckabee took turns making wisecracks about Mitt Romney's flip-flops. (McCain sarcastically called Romney "the candidate of change.")

At the Democratic debate, Barack Obama and John Edwards teamed up against Hillary Clinton, who in turn called Obama a flip-flopper.

We fact-checked many of their claims:

* Romney earned our Pants-On-Fire rating for his ridiculous claim that his TV ads do not accuse McCain of supporting amnesty for illegal immigrants. Perhaps Romney should look at his own ads, which say McCain "wrote the amnesty bill." Or the Romney for President press release that says "Senator McCain has ... supported amnesty."

* Romney was also way off with his claim that Obama "wants the government to take over health care." That's a distortion of Obama's plan, which keeps the free-market health care system intact. We gave Romney a Barely True.

* We give Mike Huckabee a False for claiming that Romney was late to support the surge of troops in Iraq. We find Romney and Huckabee both supported it from the start.

* Rudy Giuliani continues to blame Bill Clinton for shrinking the military even though PolitiFact and our colleagues at FactCheck.org and the Washington Post have repeatedly said it is a distortion by he and Romney, who made the same claim. In fact, the defense cuts under the "peace dividend" had bipartisan support. So once again, we rate this claim a Half True.

* We found Giuliani was on more solid ground with his claim that President Reagan backed amnesty for illegal immigrants. We gave that claim a True.

* Clinton had her numbers right when she said 7,000 kids in New Hampshire have benefited from the children's health insurance program. We previously determined that her boasts about the plan inflated her role, but she qualified them this time by indicating she "helped to create" the program. So we rated the statement True.

* Clinton was also right that Obama's New Hampshire chairman is a lobbyist. We gave that a True.

* Bill Richardson was correct when he said he created a reserve for home heating oil when he was energy secretary. We gave his claim a True

* Clinton offered a misleading account of Obama's vote on the Patriot Act. We gave that claim a Half True.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sancho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. I fixed the link (I think)
Sorry, I don't know why it didn't work the first time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. Facts Don't Matter Anymore
~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zalinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
5. Yes, do go to the link below
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2008/jan/06/two-parties-one-night/ but in the box titled "About this story", you get to see all the different candidates and what was said by each one. Also what the other candidates said about each other. This is supposed to be only about the last debate, but Biden was also added in for comments about candidates.

zalinda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC