Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rethinking Labor Union Endorsements

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
davidswanson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 09:59 PM
Original message
Rethinking Labor Union Endorsements
Labor unions declined to send a message on their issues or to move other candidates to their positions by backing Kucinich, but it has now become clear that they could have backed Kucinich, and he could have failed just as badly, and labor would have accomplished no less (possibly more) than it accomplished by lining up behind Clinton, Edwards, and Dodd, all of whom have lost to Obama. And Clinton, Edwards, and Dodd could have saved the energy they spent courting labor, for all the good it did them.

Some labor unions put their resources into issue campaigns, such as the California Nurses' push for single-payer health care. But why should any candidate care, as long as the union is not supporting or opposing any candidates, and with the efforts of unions who do support candidates proving so impotent.

None of this means unions won't provide substantive help to Obama in the general election. They will, and it might even make the difference. But MORE help could be offered if unions considered why their powers are so weak. The main answer, I think, is that the power of the corporate media is so incredibly strong. So, here's my proposal: Instead of investing hundreds of millions of dollars of working people's money in ads for Obama that enrich Disney, GE, and Viacom, labor should take this opportunity (this ocassion of having a non-labor guy nominated) to look elsewhere. I don't mean look to another candidate or party. I mean, instead of funding the corporate media, take all that money and create a people's television network that actually reports the news. The result would be a far greater benefit to Obama's campaign, but that would be the least of it.

Here's an AP story on the situation:

Obama Win Shakes Up Labor
By Jesse J. Holland
The Associated Press

Saturday 05 January 2008

Washington - Despite racking up almost all of the endorsements from organized labor, Hillary Rodham Clinton and John Edwards came in behind Barack Obama - the only Democratic front-runner with no national union support - in the Iowa caucuses. That left at least one union looking for a new candidate Friday.

International Association of Fire Fighters President Howard Schaitberger called the support for Obama "breathtaking," after seeing his union's candidate, Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., falter in Iowa and drop out of the race. Despite the money and the manpower organized labor shifted to Iowa for Clinton, Edwards and Dodd - one union ran television ads for Clinton while another shifted workers in-state to stump for Edwards - Obama still won convincingly.

"The tsunami was far greater than we could attempt to hold off," Schaitberger said.

Schaitberger said he talked personally with both Obama and Clinton on Friday. But the firefighters would not immediately endorse, he said. "Sometime after March, we will begin to reevaluate the remaining candidates," Schaitberger said.

Union support is supposed to be key to winning the Democratic presidential primary, with their money and foot soldiers playing key roles in the early voting states. For example, the political arm of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, which has endorsed Clinton, spent at least $250,000 to air television ads in Iowa urging her victory.

While the Service Employees International Union has not made a national endorsement - "We will make an endorsement when there is a presumptive nominee, but it is too early for that," SEIU spokeswoman Stephanie Mueller said Friday - its local chapters have split their endorsements between Clinton, Obama and Edwards.

The Iowa and New Hampshire SEIU locals are supporting Edwards, spending more than $2 million trying to get people in those two states to support the former North Carolina senator. Those resources are now being shifted solely to New Hampshire.

"In the next few days until the primary, SEIU members will engage in a massive get-out-the-vote program to ensure that workers in New Hampshire turn out in unprecedented numbers on January 8," said Jay Ward, president of the SEIU New Hampshire State Council.

Fifteen percent of New Hampshire Democrats identify themselves as members of union households.

Following New Hampshire, the next major union state on the calendar is Nevada, where the 60,000-member Culinary Workers Union, Local 226, is the biggest political powerhouse.

Obama, Edwards and Clinton have been campaigning hard for the Culinary Workers Union support, since the local's national organization, UNITE HERE, doesn't immediately plan to endorse anyone in the Democratic field.

New Hampshire and Nevada are the last union-centric states that vote before February. Clinton and Edwards need a victory or a close race to keep up with Obama leading up to the February primary calendar.

Clinton is rallying her major labor supporters in Manchester on Saturday along with her husband, former President Bill Clinton, and the heads of the American Federation of Teachers, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, the International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers and others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lisainmilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hoping Edwards gets their endorsement!
Edited on Mon Jan-07-08 10:10 PM by lisainmilo
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skinner ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think it may be time for labor unions to make their endorsements in a more unifed way.
Seeing all the different labor endorsements for different candidates really makes one wonder what is going on. By the pattern of endorsements, one could conclude that all three candidates have the same record on labor issues, but somehow I doubt that is the case. Instead of spreading their support around and canceling each other out, maybe they should figure out which candidate is the best on their issues, and then *all* endorse that candidate. At least then they might have a chance of their endorsement(s) making a difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. As a member of AFT, I want to be ASKED who I want my union to endorse
I don't like being dictated to. They have never once polled us and asked who we support. They want my COPE contributions but I have no say (at the national level) as to how that pot of money will be spent.

I appreciate my union lobbying the state legislature about education funding and hosting meet the candidate and lobbying events. But it has always bugged me that they don't poll us to find out which candidates we favor.

And it hit me hard when AFT endorsed Hillary. Yuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davsand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. You can't assume Labor is united on endorsements.
I will say freely that I doubt very much that most Labor endorsements are made based only on a candidate's record on Labor votes.

By way of example, I will tell you that in Obama's Senate Primary race here in Illinois, there was a split in Labor between endorsing Obama and one of his Primary opponents Dan Hynes. Obama had a lifetime COPE rating over 90% with Illinois Labor. Hynes, as Illinois Comptroller had no legislative history of Labor votes but he came out of a strong Labor family and has stayed close to the Illinois Labor community. It was a quandary for many of us because, for once, we were presented with a couple of VERY good Labor-friendly candidates. The trades lined up behind Hynes, the professional unions lined up behind Obama, and the state AFL-CIO endorsed Hynes at convention on a very narrow margin.

I also will tell you that I know any number of Labor folks who are pissed off at any sort of endorsement because they feel it poisons the well once a race is over. I heard any number of rank and file grumble about those Senate endorsements because they did not want their union to get in the middle of that race. Both were good candidates, yet Labor was divided on the endorsements. It wasn't about record, it came down to loyalties and personality, I think. I also think there is just no way to avoid that given the nature of the beast.


Regards!


Laura


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Their lack to unify is shown here pretty well. Another eye opener.
Nothing like rendering yourself useless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. You make a very good point about working people pouring money into the media
conglomerates. I hadn't thought about this, but I will now.

What alternatives are there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidswanson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Building Our Own
From scratch or from start-up efforts like http://www.therealnews.com/web/index.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
7. It seems like the unions need the candidates more than the other way around...
these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cloudythescribbler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. Shouldn't a labor union or local poll its members, and ...
only endorse if a candidate (eg in the primaries) has majority support? Otherwise it's just one faction speaking for everyone, even at a state or other non-national level
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC