Hillary should just stick to her own message and stop talking about obama.

[george_maniakes]

Its getting to the point where its beyond "respectful comparison", and into the realm of desperation. Hillary, tell us about your hopes and dreams, dont tell us that your annoyed about obamas hopes and dreams.

[babylonsister]

1. I think that would serve Clinton much better than being in attack mode. nt

[mtnsnake]

2. She might be better off, but it's pretty hard when you've already been attacked from all sides

but yeah, she would serve herself better by not going on the attack first.

If she's going to lay someone out, Hillary is at her best when she's counterpunching, not when she's going on the offensive.

[DemCam]

4. and what of those attacks by our beloved Edwards?

[george_maniakes]

6. I'd say he's still in the respectful comparison area.

[dflprincess]

3. I've always assumed that it was the Clinton faction of the party that pushed

for all the early primaries and caucuses so that Senator Clinton would not face any come from behind competition. As an Edwards supporter, this has irked me. But I have to say - even though it still doesn't bode well for my candidate - I'm amused that this whole plan to wrap up the nomination early may come back to bite the Clinton wing.

[george_maniakes]

5. never mind, she should get a NEW message....

politics of fear, debasing the power of MLK's vision, complaining that her opponents are getting a free ride in the media (ok maybe a case could be made with obama, but edwards?)...maybe im crazy but these things do not inspire me to vote for her.