Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton In Nashua : "After 9/11, I would never have taken us to war in Iraq"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ariesgem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 04:42 PM
Original message
Clinton In Nashua : "After 9/11, I would never have taken us to war in Iraq"
Edited on Sun Jan-06-08 04:45 PM by ariesgem
In Nashua, Hillary skates on the edge of Iraq revisionism:

"After 9/11, I would never have taken us to war in Iraq," she said. "I would have stayed focused on Afghanistan because the real threat was coming from there."

Now, that's probably true in the literal, alternate history sense: As president, she wouldn't have taken the U.S. into war. But it also revives a conversation that had flagged, about her initial vote for the use of force.

UPDATE: Obama spokesman Bill Burton takes a shot:

Hillary Clinton may try to rewrite history, but it's hard to believe she didn't know what would happen after she voted for a resolution with the title ?A Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq.? While Hillary Clinton continues to make the same kind of attacks that voters are rejecting, Barack Obama will continue telling voters about his consistent opposition to the war in Iraq from the start, and his plan to bring our troops home.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0108/Back_to_Iraq.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. What a gagtastic spin
God, I can't stand fucking liars like her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. ???
"While Hillary Clinton continues to make the same kind of attacks that voters are rejecting, Barack Obama will continue telling voters about his consistent opposition to the war in Iraq from the start..."

How is what she said an "attack?" HE'S the one attacking!

Unbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. He's talking about her attacks in the last few days up to today.
Not that particular comment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. NOt in this statement, harvey..
hillary has been slinging mud for awhile now..please try and keep up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. I'm keeping up fine.
The statement by Burton was an attack...he basically called Clinton a liar and in the same statement denounced Hillary's attacks.

Regardless of what statement he happened to be referring to, it's hypocritical of him to claim the moral high ground and then do exactly that which he accuses his opponent of doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. hillary is a liar and
I'm glad it's getting out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #19
33. Telling the truth isn't "attacking". Hillary can't just make shit up and...
expect not to be called on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #33
39. You mean like the pharamaceutical lobbyist debacle?
I'm just saying, you do discredit to your own cause by practicing a double-standard.

Both sides have unclean hands as far as I'm concerned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. Wheres the double standard?
Having a former lobbyist advising you or having a guy REGISTERED to lobby for you as a co-chair is not a big deal to me.

Voting for the IWR then trying to lie about it, that IS a big deal, and it should be to any anti-war progressive.

Lobbyist don't bother me, war does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. He is spinning. Read her speech before the IWR vote
And how dare he, as he continues to support the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ariesgem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. At the very least, she blurred the line with her support of her IRW vote by connecting 911 with Iraq
April 2004: Larry King asks Clinton whether she's "sorry" that she voted to authorize the use of force in Iraq.

"No," she says. "I don't regret giving the president authority, because at the time it was in the context of weapons of mass destruction, grave threats to the United States, and clearly, Saddam Hussein had been a real problem for the international community for more than a decade. What I regret is the way the president used the authority."

King asks Clinton if she's "frustrated" or "rethinking" her vote on the resolution.

"No," she says. "I believe strongly that after 9/11, we have to be prepared to take action to protect our country, to protect our friends and allies, American assets around the world ... Now that we're there, we're going to have to make the best of it. I think it could have been handled differently ... For the life of me, I don't understand how they had such an unrealistic view about what was going to happen."

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0404/20/lkl.00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. I would bet my life Hillary wouldn't have gone into Iraq and neither would most D's who voted IWR
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Thank you
I don't forget those who voted for IWR but I don't for a second imagine they would have decided to go into Iraq on their own, either. Not the dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Agree, it's really two separate issues, voting for IWR vs initiating the war nt
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Of course not, but that doesn't explain why they gave Junior a blank check.
Trying to rewrite history is a Hail Mary pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 05:03 PM
Original message
Well, then why didn't she stand up and scream out: "THIS IDEA IS NUTS!!!"
She has the megaphone as a U.S. Senator, and she didn't use it. She went along so the media wouldn't call her a "terrorist lover."

And her phony-baloney stances on the issue have come back to bite her on the ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemCam Donating Member (911 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
43. I would, too, Proud2BA
Her vote on the resolution has nothing to do with what she
would have done if she were at the helm. In fact, GW et. al.
are probably the only folks on the planet who would have used
the trust of the American people to do such a thing...may they be
very, very warm and uncomfortable for eternity for having done so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueManDude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
44. Agreed. Equating a YES vote with doing exactly what Bush did is ignorant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. She should just say: Hi everybody. I think you're all stupid
Is she on acid now?

So she would have never gone to Iraq, even though she voted to go into Iraq. Wow, her pupils in her eyes look huge!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. This is the dumbest thing she's done the entire campaign - and that's saying A LOT
Edited on Sun Jan-06-08 04:52 PM by Dems Will Win
IT makes her war vote the issue the day before the vote!

What a political dope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. That's true.
She wouldn't, to begin with, have called it an act of war. That was a deliberate positioning and neither Bill nor Hillary would have said it. (Nor I think, ANY president not pre-determined to invade a non-belligerent nation for any available excuse.) So the trajectory of our response would have been completely different.

This isn't a rewrite. She would have handled it differently. There never would have been an IWR to vote on. Because the discussion wouldn't have come up. Afghanistan? That I can't say. I'm thinking tactical strikes. A war is just too damned expensive for a woman to waste money on.

I know you want her to be a lying liar. But she isn't. Not about this.

Our whole experience with the Clintons shows they would have built on the goodwill of the world after 9/11, NOT destroyed it by doing what everyone on the planet opposed except Cheney and George. If you say that isn't so then YOU are the one who's lying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
20. Exactly.
I doubt anyone else other than junior would have "created" the course that was taken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
12. THen WHY did she support
bushits agenda for 5 bloody years including the initial IWR that's she NEVER apologized for?

That shit won't fly, hillary. Fooking pandering after she has blood on her hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
13. Oh, shut up Hillary. You are such a phony, and the voters see through you.
And that is why you are going down.

The argument that the IWR wasn't a vote to go to war is BOGUS. Everybody knew Bushco was going in. She helped ENABLE that. Now she wants it both ways. The vote she cast for her political expediency has come back to bite her on the ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #13
30. Which is NOT what we're discussing now.
Since you have trouble focussing, perhaps a nap?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #30
45. The argument that she wouldn't have initiated it is just bogus.
If she thought it was a bad idea, she should have said so. But she didn't. She went along with it.

I can understand why you're cranky, though...Hasn't been a good few days for Hillary supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
14. And Bill said he was against it from the beginning.
You can't believe a word these two say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. and I've got a very nice bridge to sell you in brooklyn!
He made an ass out of himself with the inane comment. She is doing the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. I agree...
It's sad to see them go down this road.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
15. She is such a liar. n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
17. Oh that hillary...just a
fucking liar when get down to it..pandering, desperate mudslinging, hypocrit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
18. Seems accurate. Junior cherry-picked intel to get the result he wanted.
Edited on Sun Jan-06-08 05:04 PM by wlucinda
There is no reason to think Hillary or any other CIC would have done the same...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellst0nev0ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. An Enabler Is An Enabler Is An Enabler.
Edited on Sun Jan-06-08 05:26 PM by wellst0nev0ter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. BS. NO Dem POTUS would have done what junior did.
I can't beleive you would think that any of them would. Amazing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. She could have said "no" to "what junior did"- but she said "yes."
Edited on Sun Jan-06-08 05:36 PM by Dr Fate
And maintained her support of the invasion until fairly recently.

If she was so opposed to Bush faking info and diverting defense efforts, then she could have said so and voted accordingly at the time that she is trying to turn back to now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellst0nev0ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #29
47. Yep If She's Not Renouncing That Vote
Because she is afraid of the neocons, how would she act when the neocons would have pressed her to fight O-Saddam Bin Laden?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #25
32. But she's not talking about the IWR vote.
You, too. Naptime. Come back when you can focus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. But we are. And she voted "yes", not "no." She DID allow the invasion of Iraq
Edited on Sun Jan-06-08 05:50 PM by Dr Fate
She certainly didnt say "no" to it. I never heard her protest it or speak out against it before it happened.

Just because Hillary wants to somehow separate her "yes" vote to the invasion from the actual invasion itself doesnt mean everyone else will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellst0nev0ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #32
46. She Voted For The War. Deal With It.
When push came to shove, she didn't do the right thing. Hell, she didn't even read the intelligence reports necessary to do the right thing. If she was sincere about doing the right thing now, then what is the problem renouncing her IWR completely?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #18
26. Except Hillary didnt point that out. Instead she said "yes" to the invasion.
Edited on Sun Jan-06-08 05:42 PM by Dr Fate
The average DUer pieced together the available legitimate and even mainstream news sources and figured out they were lying-certainly before the invasion, in fact.

Hillary voted "yes"- if she really was opposed to relying on fake info, she could have said so in a speech before a "no" vote. At the least, she could have retracted her position and pointed out this kind of thing before the invasion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
24. Hmmm-a fib or a big stretch there-she voted "yes" to the Invasion.
If she wants to say she would not have invaded, then a "no" vote as opposed to her "yes" vote would make more sense...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #24
35. Okay, is this some mass reading difficulty? A flaw in our school system?
Once again, Hillary is NOT discussing IWR. She is discussing what SHE would have done as president after 9/11. BEFORE IWR EVER WAS DISCUSSED OR THOUGHT OF BY CONGRESS. Her course would not have taken us to war.

Try to concentrate. You can read this correctly if you really try. Or perhaps there's someone you can get to help you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. I would believe her if she had said "no" to the invasion instead of "yes" to it.
Edited on Sun Jan-06-08 05:52 PM by Dr Fate
If she would have acted differently than Bush as Executive, then she would have said "no" to him in her vote, not "yes."

LOL! You say I have a comprehension problem, but I'm not the one who seems to be confusing the word "yes" with "no."


Please-Just because I dont buy the continuing spin on her "yes" vote doesnt mean I'm confused or that I dont know what she is trying to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
31. This, in a nutshell, is why I can't vote for Hillary Clinton
Edited on Sun Jan-06-08 05:43 PM by Wolsh
Every politician lies, her's are just amazing transparent and dangerous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. Because you don't understand a thing she says?
I definitely get that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. I understand that she is a liar who also was a catalyst for the Iraq war
That part isn't hard to understand at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sulawesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. With respect, suppose you are correct, if she was president she would not go into Iraq.
Now imagine she feels that way, but that George Bush asks for authorization to invade Iraq. I think she would say "no", but she said "yes". I think people are correct to be puzzled by her comments today. If things are different with hindsight, why not just say that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
42. Good for her. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC